>farenheit
>miles
>yards
>feet
>inches
>pounds
>ounces
Farenheit
Jeremiah Martin
Connor Adams
What's wrong with any of that?
Ryder Young
Are implying that the freezing point at 32 makes no sense?
Nathan Flores
you just took me back to 8th grade, i remember busting my ass having to memorize all of those, plus the international one and the british one.
Elijah Collins
Miles, pounds and ounces are fine.
David Taylor
you forgot a few like gallon cup and table/tea spoon
Lucas Hill
Fahrenheit: 0 F really cold, 100 F pretty hot
Celsius: 0 C pretty cold, 100 C instantly dead
Fahrenheit is the ideal measurement of temperature for human experience. Celsius is only useful in science
Zachary Ross
Farenheit is a much better temperature than Celsius in the context of weather because it has a better resolution over the habitable temperature range than Celsius does. In Farenheit 0F is really cold. 100F is really hot and the temperature is a linear scale between those two points. On the other hand the same range in Celsius is packed between -17C and 37C which is just weird and it's compressed down into a smaller and less descriptive range of numbers. I consider there to be a big difference between 55F and 70F for instance. 55F is somewhat chilly but 70F is mild and warm. In Celsius 55F is 13C and 70F is 21C. That's barely any different and it's really confusing. Inadequate resolution. Celsius and Kelvin are better left in the laboratory where wider temperature ranges are used regularly and such scales make more sense.
Nathan Torres
>0 C pretty cold
Jaxon Sullivan
If Celsius was only useful in science it would cease to exist because Kelvin is so much better for scientific purposes.