Which one should I go all in?
REQ or LINK?
Kayden Wilson
Other urls found in this thread:
tartine-crowdfunding.request.network
twitter.com
Owen Thomas
Link.
Colton Sullivan
Short term REQ
Camden Hill
My REQ stays high tech
My Linky stays stinky
Ryder Howard
Req sir is best coin for incest right now.
Very good price. Good profit sir.
Lucas White
ID green
>Check
ID tch
>Check
Digits
>Check
All in Req and Link confirmed.
Ethan Walker
we are brothers, but there is a clear favorite
Brandon Perry
I would consider REQ a worse risk/reward investment than Chainlink. Both have potential though.
Kayden Martin
What picture did you post?
Brayden Sanders
REQ (check)
Colton Johnson
Req is calling
Thomas Morales
I like what both have set out to accomplish, but feel Link has the potential to go much higher than Req. I still need to see exactly how Link’s reward system for node operators is going to play out first, but I’m fairly optimistic about it.
Bentley Russell
got 2 eth left
already stinky
shill me Reqy
Aiden Reyes
I bought 100k req at 4.7c. Exchanged all of it for L I N K when req was 27c and L I N K was 26.
>t. high rolla
Benjamin Adams
you could go 50/50 if you are not confident on either one being better.
Justin Garcia
Digits almost got me. Keep these shit coins away from me.
Zachary Campbell
Req can't go any lower. The French team is done smoking their cigarettes and eating baguettes. It's time for them to get back to work and they are on it!!
REQ easily $100 EOY
Wyatt Robinson
Coinbase gonna add REQ soon
Benjamin Morales
REQ is a shitcoin. There's minimal network effect associated with the network - nobody actually uses the coin for anything except the REQ burn contract, which is just a simple low-impact deflationary mechanism. They shat the bed with WikiFrance and swept fiat integration off the roadmap. They're a small amateur team trying to do 10 different things at once. Most of REQ's use cases died with the bull market, as suddenly 'pay with crypto' started to sound exactly as stupid as it actually is. Paying with a REQ button still requires an ETH wallet and metamask installed which excludes 99.9999999% of the world population from using it for the foreseeable future.
meanwhile ChainLink is a focused project with skilled devs that is focused on launching a business-ready smart contract middleware solution which uses the LINK token for staking and rewards for every oracle request made. And the market for adoption isn't a handful of nerds who want to pay for their XXL HODL tshirt using metamask and a WooCommerce plugin, it's the entirety of the fintech and traditional business world.
REQ already released mainnet, their hand is on the table and it blows. LINK still has mainnet to go which in terms of potential hype buildup and price action in the future is a positive.
I know both coins looked attractive back in December, but by now you need to appreciate that one of these projects has been chugging steadily along at delivering on its revolutionary use case with no stop in sight, and the other has failed miserably at delivering on its promises and is now sitting around with its thumb up its ass hoping noone notices.
Leo Carter
I have both so I can be in on the one that moons first, but I think they're both good buys.
Charles Ward
And before anyone says to give REQ a chance - I'd been bagholding 50k of those motherfuckers since mid-december, like a fucking idiot. I was on this board hours a day trying to damage control the wikimedia fuckup after that bomb dropped. I was straight deluded. It took two more biweekly updates of them talking a lot but doing absolutely nothing for the message to finally sink in: REQ is shit and always will be. I sold at that bizarre pump to 1400 sats a week or two ago, put half the proceeds to buy more LINK and never looked back.
Nathaniel Cox
well fuck
Matthew Cruz
Chainlink friend. For req to moon it needs fiat->crypto. For req to have that it needs chainlink. Chainlink pops off first, then you can move some to Req. But Req won't really take off until it burns millions of tokens, so you have a few years. Not to get it this cheap, but i think the money will do better in Link
Colton Rodriguez
Fuck off you deluded faggot. I lost everything thanks to REQ. I even bought "the dip" after may bulltrap. FML
Juan Murphy
Just like REQ needs LINK to implement BTC? They did it on their own without LINK
Christopher Taylor
Yeah, they did that. But that's pretty straightforward. To do fiat->fiat, and fiat->shitcoin is substantially more complicated because it requires monitoring thousands of exchange rates in real time as opposed to just watching the btc->USD price.
Nolan Parker
REQ is dead without LINK but LINK will succeed anyway so buy both