Nearly 500 peequests pendings

That's just like a few dollars worth of ETH.

French devs took 10,000 ETH and can afford to feign usage and shill their failed token by send scraps to the burner and get the REQlets riled up.

lel, except you can clearly see that's not true by looking at how the transactions are happening on ethscan, you dumb fucking cunt. The majority of recent burns have been from actual transactions taking place utilizing the REQ platform. It's not a ton of tokens because such a small % gets burned of each purchase, which is the entire intention of the platform - fees are incredibly low. NEXT.

>Nobody is using the platform!!!
>*shows proofs of many webpages and shops using the app*
>Uhhh b-b-but no one cares about THEM! It's only valid if BIG COMPANIES use it!
Kys

Literally no one is using this token. These are probably devs fucking with you.

It's funny how desperate you are to become wealthy, without actually putting in effort.

You realize that in order to succeed in life you need to get involved and show personal initiative and produce something of value. Sitting at your computer shilling shitcoins is not going to get you there I'm afraid lil REQLet.

Attached: 1415998709564.jpg (1067x1600, 150K)

Literally all you have to do is read the other replies in this thread to realize what a fucking hopeless loser you are.

>Literally no one is using this token
Is this pasta adapted to FUD REQ? Because you don't use the token. Are you ok user, do you need a (You)?

5 cents next week REQlet. Doesn't matter how many niche crypto ass-plugs some Redditor's webshop sells.

Attached: 1435774637334.jpg (500x492, 38K)

Go jerk off you lonely, whiny little bitch. You have no value.

why cant I buy a Jow Forums pass with request yet? screw these tshirt dropshippers

mootwo is already rich enough from selling confidential data on 2chan. He doesn't need your money.

At this point I assume it's just trolls trying to fuck with reddit or something.

Nah, definitely people who bought the top. Look at all the things people completely shit on to the point discussion is impossible. REQ, NANO. DBC etc. The things people shit on are the things that lost them the most money. Whether it is a good project or not is pretty much irrelevant.

Is it really about price development right now though and top buyers? Go read some of the old blogs and how hard they were bullshitting us. We're past mid-year and there is ONE, fucking ONE, application that gets used a bit which is a e-shop plugin like any fucking other which offers little to no needed functionality for most people (they don't even support that many currencies yet) which is literally only used by redditors buying other redditor's handicraft 'HODL' t-shirts for $100.

>How Request will integrate Continuous Payments?
On the user interface side, Request will make it easy to create a continuous payment request, as well as other payment types (escrow, factoring, down payments…).

>Continuous invoices will be incorporated into Request as an extension. The extension layer has been designed to handle any type of advanced payment conditions.

>To bypass an infinity of transaction costs, a continuous invoice will work in a similar way as a vesting contract—your balance on the invoice increases continuously and you can withdraw the invoice funds to your account at any time.

>Depending on the demands, we expect Request to support Continuous Payments in Q1 2018.

WHERE IS THIS? Q1 ?! It's past Q2 AND WE HAVE FUCKING NOTHING.

This.

The market price is a reflection of this.

Even more pending now

Attached: F7FE45C0-C31D-482B-97F7-AF2CC7C0913A.jpg (750x334, 84K)

The team have fucked up a lot with delays I agree. This is crypto though and the fundamentals barely matter, If it had continuous payments the price would probably be the exact same. The reason for the price drop is lack of advertising the product. Best case scenario is they drop a load of cool shit at once.

Again I was commenting on the people currently shitting on the projects reason for caring.I just bought back after selling way too early in December because I though it was too early for it to be worth so much.

They gave us such a fine chart to compare the current Request Network to their dream.

Attached: we aim for hundred percent completion in 40 years.jpg (2000x2374, 697K)

>If it had continuous payments the price would probably be the exact same.
Well I agree with you on that. You need something big to even elevate the baseline price of anything by only 20% during this bear market, but with the utter lack of progress and the many completely baseless deadlines they offered it's no surprise it doesn't even manage to maintain it's value for even a little bit.

>A few projects (less than 10) have signed up with an NDA and/or a contract and are in the final phase.
This is a tiny ray of hope left to REQ for the short-term. Although my research made me quite bitter and I wouldn't be surprised they're just fucking lying again. If the next blog doesn't showcase some of these, I am positive they just made this shit up.