Pakistanis descended from the Mughals

Incredibly weak understanding of history.

lmao india is 4% of the world's gdp now
it was 25% under the mughals

also india is 130 ranked in the hdi, while it had a decent gdp per capita under the mughal, despite hindu chimpout, it was a nice proto industrialization going on

Ta gueule bicot, rentre dans ton pays de merde

>like Qing's china
Yes I remember that part Dowager spent money on her palace instead of military

Non, je vais te remplacer, et tu ne peux rien y faire.

Pakistan and Bangladesh are even worse on HDI. What's your point? Mugal Empire was already growing incredibly weaker after the death of Aurengzeb and its end would have come whether there were Marathas or not.

T'as bon dos de poster derrière un drapeau français pauvre parasite
Prends toi un trip si t'es pas une sous merde sans couilles

didnt knew Pakistan and Bangladesh were under the mughal rule in the last 3 centuries

>What's your point
Indian subcontinent would be better if it stayed united under the mughal and was not colonized

>Mugal Empire was already growing incredibly weaker after the death of Aurengzeb
Yes, because of local chimputs against the mughal authority

Désolé, je ne prends pas d'ordre d'un futur remplacé. Reste à ta place, cocu.

T'assumes même pas d'où tu viens pauvre victime
Même pas sur un putain de board anonyme japonais

Vas te pendre bougnoule

Don't argue with butthurt cowardly sandnigger

Nothing you have said is right.
Where are you even getting your history from?

Mughals couldve civilised you, but the brits had to ruin it.

Cringe

>spent all his money on wars
It's not like he was expanding pointlessly. He was losing territory to the Marathas and had to defend it.

Mes origines ont aucun rapport avec la discussion, sale autiste.

>Nothing you have said is right.
nice argument here bro

Not going to argue with someone who didn't know that Pakistan and Bangladesh were under Mugal rule too

I never said that, thought.

The Mughals were a trillion times better than modern day pooland

If Pakistanis are descendants of Mugals, why are doing worse than India on every level?

>If Pakistanis are descendants of Mugals
They aren't and I never said that. Cure your inferiority complex, dude.

Both India and Pakistan and Bengladesh got buttfucked and raped by 300 years of western colonialism.

>lmao india is 4% of the world's gdp nowit was 25% under the mughals
It's almost like Europe, Japan and the Americas had an industrial revolution or something, weird huh?

Woah there buddy, I never said Pakistan are descendants of the Mughals or that they are better than India. All I said is that they could have civilized your modern day shithole.

>The Golden Horde conquered Finland
????

it's almost like the mughal were a proto-industrialized state, huh?
it's almost like 200+ years of colonialism delayed their industrialisation, huh?

You didn’t adjust for inflation. The industrial revolution came way after though.

As if India didn't have sophisticated societies before Mugal Empire.

your posts scream butthurt and inferiority complex

you need to accept your history, rajesh

>it's almost like the mughal were a proto-industrialized state, huh?
Actually it's not like that at all, it's more like they had 25% of the world's manpower since that was pretty much all that mattered pre industrial revolution.
>it's almost like 200+ years of colonialism delayed their industrialisation, huh?
I fail to see how us building a fuckton of railways and factories delayed their industrialisation but ok

They didn’t

>Therefore I have a legitimate claim to the Swedish throne
Based. Can i be a member of your Royal Guard?

?

Attached: ind.png (1034x549, 936K)

For context Muslim Empires started coming to the Indian subcontinent in 1200s

>this plebbit pajeet getting triggered

Attached: tunak-o.gif (320x238, 416K)

>Mughal Empire also ushered in a period of proto-industrialization,[33] and around the 17th century, Mughal India became the world's largest economic and manufacturing power,[34] producing a quarter of global industrial output up until the 18th century.[35][36]

>Mughal India's economy has been described as a form of proto-industrialization, like that of 18th-century Western Europe prior to the Industrial Revolution.[33]

>Jeffrey G. Williamson has argued that the Indian economy went through deindustrialization in the latter half of the 18th century as an indirect outcome of the collapse of the Mughal Empire, with British rule later causing further deindustrialization.[63]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mughal_Empire

You deindustrialize them to make them farmers and other slaves.

>building a fuckton of railways and factories delayed their industrialisation
""you"" build them in your dream, the railways were to extract ressource, it's not industrialization, and it's certainly not in india's best interest

>India's De-Industrialization Under British Rule: New Ideas, New Evidence

>India was a major player in the world export market for textiles in the early 18th century, but by the middle of the 19th century it had lost all of its export market and much of its domestic market. Other local industries also suffered some decline, and India underwent secular de-industrialization as a consequence. While India produced about 25 percent of world industrial output in 1750, this figure fell to only 2 percent by 1900. We use an open, specific-factor model to organize our thinking about the relative role played by domestic and foreign forces in India's de-industrialization. The construction of new relative price evidence is central to our analysis. We document trends in the ratio of export to import prices (the external terms of trade) from 1800 to 1913, and that of tradable to non-tradable goods and own-wages in the tradable sectors going back to 1765. With this new relative price evidence in hand, we ask how much of the de-industrialization was due to local supply-side influences (such as the demise of the Mughal empire) and how much to world price shocks (such as world market integration and rapid productivity advance in European manufacturing), both of which had to deal with an offset the huge net transfer from India to Britain before 1815. Whether the Indian de-industrialization shocks and responses were big or small is then assessed by comparisons with other parts of the periphery.

nber.org/papers/w10586

Why do those neo hindu nationalists can't accept the islamic part of their history? They almost consider the sultanate and mughal as some foreign colonial power.
this cringy nationalistic revisionnism is rather pathetic.

Delete this. Before the industrial revolution GDP just meant how many people you had. Also, India did not exist prior to British rule.

India is a colonial creation, true. If the princely state stayed after 1948, it would be better for indians.

He's most probably from r/bakchodi or some shit. I'm not really fond of Islam or muzzies but mughals (fuck aurangzeb) were an integral part of our history. They made India their home unlike some Persian or Afghan rulers who cane here demolished everything, looted the place and took everything back to their own country. But I'm thankful that the Marathas ended their rule and the British finally put a nail in the coffin.

analysing those empire with some racialist paragism is not optimal, the mughal had an old mongol origin, from an uzbek (timurid), but the founder Babur was mostly turkic stock from the chagatai, and the empire was a persianate (iranian) and obviously indianized too.
Like the other gunpowder empire, safavid were a kurd-roman-turkic-persian-georgian mix, and ottoman mostly circassian-greek-balkanit-greek-turkic.
Mughals were usually rather tolerant when it comes to the dhimmi statue.

Maratha or mughal, wich matter is a strong empire in the indian subcontinent to stop the western colonialism that ruined India.

Brits had no issue with directly and indirectly killing like 50 millions indians with famines.

What have you people done to my we wuzzing thread?

>50 million
most of those famines were caused by environmental events. One was a 4 year long El Niño, the great Bengali famine was caused by forcing poppy cultivation though

>dindu nuffin in Ireland
>dindu nuffin in the Bengal famine