Just work hard and you'll make it

Just work hard and you'll make it

Attached: millionaires.png (834x2417, 468K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nautil.us/issue/68/context/why-poverty-is-like-a-disease-rp
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Have inherited money
>80%

Attached: 1452840933605.jpg (194x273, 10K)

>3% are millionaires
>6.4% blackmans are millionaires (lowest race listed)
How does this make sense? Am I reading this wrong?

>Have inherited money: 80%
>Say they are rich because of hard work: 95%

Attached: 1528833286400.jpg (576x432, 47K)

100 Americans
3 are millionaires
Of this 100, 15 are black. Of this 15, 1 of those black people is a millionaire, or about 6%.

At least that's how I interpret it, but maybe I'm retarded as well

Yeah I though about that as well but if you add up the numbers for the listed races it only comes out at 57%, so what race are the other 43%? I mean most merchants would be considered white, right?

I'll inherit something around 160k from my mom, and i don't know how much from my dad but probably more cause he's worth several mill

>J-just work hard bro!

>all these demographic statistics on millionaires
>they just so happen to forget to include the ones about Jews

Attached: coffee foot.jpg (1280x720, 40K)

Not everyone can be a millionaire.

A good article on this nautil.us/issue/68/context/why-poverty-is-like-a-disease-rp

poverty is a disease because poor people are allowed to breed
there is no need for human slaves, undereducated dumb, worthless, mindless workers anymore, so it should be banned and poor people would quietly finally disappear and be replaced by automatization and drones

Rich people don't have enough children

You should read the article really. Rich people aren't more useful than poor people, most rich people don't produce anything or stimulate the economy, they just hoard money. Some actually destroy the economy, like shark ceos that just fire thousands of people to give more money to shareholders.

"poor people" exist because of wealth distribution being heavily biased towards those already with wealth, which is dependant upon exploitation and predation of others. This ensures an underclass because the system of capital requires an underclass.
If you want to get rid of the worthless scum holding back society, you need to remove the wealth from the wealthy.

Both of these.

>160k? I can live off of that for life! Fucking richfags inheriting money....
Poor commie faggot. If you had any chance of actually becoming rich you would know you need to earn that at least every other year, of course not many retail jobs pay 80k sadly for you

Publically traded companies create perverse incentives that often go directly against what is best for society and the economy.
Having a business that serves a need and makes lots of money isn't good enough in the world of publically traded companies, you HAVE to see growth at all times.

It also creates situations like what happened with Toys R Us where a bunch of financial vultures came in and uses financial meme magic to kill a business that was doing perfectly fine just so they could drain all the money out of it.

gamers rise up

>Just inherit bro!

Poverty is relative. If nobody is poor, nobody is rich.
Except somebody will inevitably end up owning more drones and robots than the other guy and so they will become the new rich. Then their successors will inherit and the cycle continues.

160k is an easy million doing some simple stock options
the difference is a lot of people start with 160 instead of 160k so making that million on stocks takes a lot longer. still doable though

>rich people aren't more useful than poor people
yeah lol they just get different jobs because of economic privilege. Commies actually believe this

>hoard money
Which lowers the interest rate and return on investment which actually heals income inequality faster than if they spent it on luxuries or new businesses thus crowding poorfags out. Of course commies don't understand economics

>muh sharks
Mmhmm

Oh hey discord. How about you actually consider his argument? Wouldn't it be better for income equality if rich people had more children than poor people? Wouldn't that be good even if you dismiss the obvious truth that poorfag kids are inherently less useful and productive than richfag kids for reasons other than money?

>Odds of running a successful startup
>0,50%
>1 in fucking 200
Muh startup nation

Attached: 1531727322-xvmf95f245c-884f-11e8-af74-36cf2d08f424-805x453.jpg (805x453, 35K)

not anymore. There will be an end to the exploitation, when there will be no need to exploit. Most of the jobs an uneducated hillbilly, or even a common person CAN do will be automatized.
They should then be removed as obsolete.
the world doesn't need more people. It needs less, way less.
you are talking about the few ultra-rich, who are beyond law now, and have enough power to live and do as they please. They or their parents were competent enough to "win" the human struggle. At some point they had to show that they are better than the trash.
The growing poor class on the other hand is a hindrance they and the upper-middle class can and should cut out, since they have no use anymore.

If they invest into them, they will become competition. If they let them live as poor, they are worthless and a hazard. The population of Earth can and should be reduced, starting with poor people worldwide.

Some one in their family worked hard for it so its true. I don't understand how the concept of family and inheritence has bcome such a negative thing. WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU EARNING MONEY FOR IF NOT TO SEE YOUR GENETIC PROGENITORS HAPPY AND SUCCESSFUL YOU FUCKING MARXIST THOUGHT RUINED CLOWNS

Gee it's almost like starting a business is risky and difficult and it's not as simple as rent seeking like signing up for welfare. Good job successful entrepeneurs and thanks for creating jobs!

the article was clearly about people, who have to worry about their meal, or can't afford/don't have access to education
they are a problem and should be eliminated as such

Startups are pretty much just throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. You're not supposed to put all your effort into one and see through to success, it's just a numbers game.

Inherited some money, could even be $1. Doesn't mean that even a majority of those inherited a significant amount at an early enough age to ensure their success.

#FEEL THE BERN

Donald Drumpf' hands typed this

>tfw inherited 55k (USD)
>tfw absolute single digit IQ retard who understands nothing of economy/business
>have no idea what to do with the money and it's been sitting in a saving accounts since october

At least it's gone up to 57 k during that time...

that's normal, not every business idea will work out
This basically. Luxury and inheritance are good things, because they represent positivism in society. They are things to work and fight for.

But user everyone is supposed to be equal. How are my trashy drug addicted retail working kids supposed to compete with well adjusted kids who inherit money from their successful parents?

https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationalreview.com%2F2015%2F05%2Fprofessor-if-you-read-your-kids-youre-unfairly-disadvantaging-others-katherine-timpf%2F&psig=AOvVaw1SWdNE9ObLYGM0g5RH0tur&ust=1549729316542658

The funny thing is that being a "Successful startup" does have to mean you've created anything of worth.
It just means that you've convinced someone with a lot of money that it has the potential to.

And that's a good thing.

short tesla and take it out in 2 weeks
thank me later

I figure I will inherit shit from my dad not because hes poor but because he's retired and can spend money. I told him to just leave enough to bury him.

the only thing i will inherit is debt

>That's normal, 99,5% will fail
Successful buisinesses are ones that break the law actually

Hahahhaa cope Mélanchon. Go move to Portugal or North Korea or Cuba, you are a disgrace to your republic.

t Tax evader

Yeah the math doesn´t check out at all. This implies that either 33% of postgrads are millionaires or that 50% of millionaires don´t have a high school degree.

>8/10 millionnaire have inherited money
This is the one thing that don't really make sense
How much money? Doesn't everyone inherit money from their dead parents? Wouldn't it be better to look at the % that came from rich family rather than have this useless stat?

>80% inherited money
>95% are wealthy because of hard work
god damn i want to genocide all rich people

ive face bigger odds before

Attached: sperm_meeting_egg.jpg (600x399, 53K)

percent of US billionaires who are Jews: 50%

Attached: file.png (756x548, 174K)