The only objective difference between BTC and BCH is that the latter can be used both as digital gold and also to be sent p2p for a tiny fee. Do you agree?
The only objective difference between BTC and BCH is that the latter can be used both as digital gold and also to be...
There are major fundamental differences. The difficulty adjustment interval for instance is not 2016 blocks any more, like on bitcoin.
Holy shiet wat dat botch name
You forget that BCH will never amount to anything other than “that fork of bitcoin” because it’s called “Bitcoin *subtitle*”
The only objective difference between BTC and BCH is nobody cares about BCH.
When it was set to 2016 blocks, it was set to 2016 pernamently by Satoshi. Just like the total coins limit is 21 million Bitcoins, set by Satoshi, so is the adjustment 2016 blocks, also set by Satoshi. And so is the block size cap 1MB, set by Satoshi.
You are free to have a different opinion, but that is an opinion not objective fact.
this and also roger ver is a scammer
Retard claiming Bitcoin is "uhm you know digital cash whose rules are secondary"
yeah also
segwit
replace by fee
limited blocksize
no op codes
I think that the better it works as p2p hurts how well it works as store of value. To the extreme, we would all be using feeless transactions for p2p, but if nobody is profiting from handling the transactions, there's not much downside to handling them wrong, then what's being sent is probably about free. I don't know if that makes complete sense, if I buy something from a black market maybe the fees are free but the things we trade may be more expensive because there's an additional risk and that's where the actual fees go.
Not an objective thing, like the other guy said, my opinion.
Better than rules set by arbitrary chink with the most miners.
damn my dick is go up so hard ohh man... i jerk rite fuckin now ayy dammit i wanna sniff that shit eat that shit and fuck that shit. let me pull my stick on em ahhh yeeesss u like that one?
That's what you think as a speculator. The truth is, people don't give a shit what kind of money they use. Niggas was using puka shells and frozen turds as currency back in the day.
ownership of hashrate is pretty much the same on both forks
except jihan says he is mining btc for short term profitability and bch long term
from my dead cold hands.
Nakamoto consensus as defined by the longest proof of work chain defined by Nakamoto rules.
As verified on my raspberry.
butterface
Show me one block mined by Jihan from the bch pool you claim is real.
IF YOU DON'T POST SAUCE OP BCH CRASHES TO $.01 TONIGHT
it really is as simple as this. They need to re-brand.
checked, however you are sorely mistaken about this, as most (current) ASIC miners have a BTC/BCH switch on them. if you think there are more politically motivated than profit motivated miners then you are mistaken. the one who is most politically motivated, by fucking far, is one of the biggest proponents of BCH.
BCH could literally succeed without Western culture (which is the only place where re-brands exist, unless they are trying to appeal to Westerners)
what are you claiming jihan doesn't mine bch?
already taken :)
you're icoherent
bcashers prove once again they are newfag retards who have no idea what they're talking about.
satoshi himself added the 1mb limit you dumb cunts.
that doesn't mean it wasn't meant to be changed, but the fact is he put it there.
that commit was by satoshi you fucking idiot
sorry bro, I'm a fellow cashie.
I just trolled you
Anyways what we say at this point does not matter, what matters is that pro Blockstream propaganda is at the top, place that everyone reads.
My job is done, have fun retards :)
Stop smoking cannabis and clean your room
Let's post ad hominem for a change the post
Bch is about to flip btc.
Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, Calvin Ayre, The 8btc mod (19hZx234vNtLazfx5J2bxHsiWEmeYE8a7k), Jiang Zhouer, the bitcoin.com cofounder, the Coinbase founder - all BILLIONAIRES who can complete the flippening with their own cash TODAY
They're not doing so because they'd rather invest in BCH adoption. BCH adoption is skyrocketing while btc adoption is dropping.
In a few years both St Kitts and Antigua will use BCH as their main currency (Roger is working on St Kitts, Calvin is investing in Antigua more money than their GDP exclusively because of BCH adoption), Craig Wright will increase transaction counts by circumventing corrupt governments in Africa for money transfers (this one is not certain but very possible considering his funding), Roger is speaking to VIP-s every other day, including Japanese bank CEO-s, stock exchange owners, etc. Brian Armstrong will push BCH and shit on BTC subtly every chance he gets, bitcoin.com wallet is the most popular mobile wallet and it literally shits on BTC, propaganda/censorship effects are fading, Purse just added BCH meaning that normies can use it to get 20% discounts on amazon, Koreans love BCH and they seem to matter at least as much as Americans and significantly more than eurofags, miners are looking for ways to destroy BTC in the next few years otherwise their profits will crumble, LN is proving more and more of a failure every single day, Wright will patent-troll startups into moving into BCH, tipping on github is now possible with bch, smart contracts are coming in November, stress tests are a massive success, charities are popularizing BCH in struggling countries (Venezuela today, others will join in if trouble arises), Free Society project is progressing well, Circle is adding BCH next few weeks, Ayre who became a billionaire from gambling is going to create BCH-only online casinos.
Mimblewimble
lol. imagine being op, and this deluded. bch is nowhere near btc adoption and will always be seen as the coin that no one wants to use. it is a fork, just like btcp, btg, and a bunch of other btc forks. litecoin on the other hand is its own genesis block. the forks will die.
Milk posting is so much better than brap posting.
Milk posters are retards.
>Liking the literal nectar of humans
>Liking physical feces
Only one person is a retard here buddy brap.
Nigger alert
>The only objective difference between BTC and BCH is that the latter can be used both as digital gold and also to be sent p2p for a tiny fee. Do you agree?
Throwing away segwit made BCH also able to offer reliable enough 0-conf instant payments (crucial for local payments).
Other than that, pretty much the same except the stuff being built on either. For example, BCH has their tumblr quasi-user thing, tippr, sms transfer service (no internet required).
But yeah overall, pretty much the same except no segwit on BCH, and larger blocks.
Adding smart contract capabilities might change this though. Including it being much much easier to build complex 2nd layer scaling solutions on top of the base layer. Segwit that enables LN are both dead ends in blockchain development.
Personally I don't like BCH very much because I favor casper POS game theory and costs over POW, and prefer the flexibility of what can be achieved with smart contracts + POS when it comes to scaling and fintech.
Realistically though, the first seriously adopted crypto moneys are likely BCH, Stellar and Ethereum. The first two because they are trying and succeeding in gaining adoption (especially in third world) and ethereum because projects built on it and wallets built on it are spreading and ethereum as a currency is piggybacking on that. ICOs recognizing it as money for fundraising purposes was only the first step.
>Throwing away segwit made BCH also able to offer reliable enough 0-conf instant payments (crucial for local payments).
You, sir, have no idea what you are saying.
This is the most important debate and you're a fucking retard kys
I agree. Litecoin is way more promising than Bcash. Most of the fud around LTC is coming from Bcashie cultists.
you've been played
it's a thread from yesterday.
That ain't a butter mug, punk.
replace by fee not segwit destroyed 0 conf on btc
replace by fee means higher fees would be mined first so you could double spend by sending a transaction to buy something then sending it again to yourself with a high fee
But he's right? Segwit by definition defies 0-conf, it cannot be done.
Wow. What the fuck
Anyway, reality time: Nearly no one uses or cares for your chink coin, even though your overlords decided to arbitrarily increase the block size limit twice, it was all a pointless PR stunt as the actual block size is still less than 20% of a full 1.1MB bitcoin block.
You boast "multiple development teams" but the only beecash dev anyone knows of is a single French pajeet and the only development that has happened from bitcoin to beecash is the block size limit number that got needlessly increased and the hacky EDA that got added to be exploited (and later removed when people caught on).
Tldr; kill yourself, I don't even know why I still waste time replying to shills and pajeets in here
it's the same, both are based on useless old tech no one wants to use. stop obsessing with fucking bitcoin and its forks.
Soon BCore will achieve their desired coin immobility which will finally transform their coin into precious digital gold!
hopefully they fork to proof of stake so I can permanently stake my wealth in it
I came
Already came. Don't care now.
that’s where you’re right kiddo
You cant have digital gold with centralized datacenter corporations only auditing the blockchaim due hueg blocks
It's the same thread as yesterday what the fuck.
You've been played faggots.
bump
..
M I L K M O M M Y