Intellectual dark web
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
rhizzone.net
twitter.com
>>Jow Forums
Only faggots listen or watch eceleb dips
Looks like an elders of zion meeting
Damn, I wish I was at that table, fuck man.
What the fuck I've never seem them all together like that
Are you fucking kidding me? How did this happen?
finally a mutual masturbation society for closeted homosexual "celebrities"
All brain dead faggots except rogan and harris
What does that have to do with business?
>everyday until you like it, Jow Forums is always right
Fuck off.
Rogan will eventually be brain dead with all the drugs he takes
“Bunch of white guys”
Shapiro faggot is a fruit
Im in your area
There's something quite off-white about all them desu
>Jordan Peterson
>intellectual
Pick one
how do you mean "how did this happen?"
its all a fucking psyop you mouth-breathing tards.
how is this not obvious to absolutely everyone by now?
pseudo-political/intellectual jibberish is the the new bread and circus. the opium of the asses. no doubt every single one these guys is paid as a "gatekeeper" of "dangerous" ideas
fuck, i still talk to people who think that the 60s wasnt a cover to cover psyop too. people are retarded faggots desu baka senpai
all these guys do is jack each other off these days
They’re reddit phenomenas.
>*youtube phenomenas
Fixed
theyre spammed relentlessy on every shade of "right-leaning" websites. the youtube sorting algos push them to the top if you watch even ONE video that could be considered "alt-right". theyre allowed to do and say things that others would be censored or ridiculed for saying. their whole rise to fame (rogan aside obviously, but i still think his whole push to get people to take heavy hallucinogens is questionable) for each of them was built around manufactured outrage, and then a contrived banning/censoring of their videos, followed by cheers from "the left".
this is all a part of an elaborate D&C campaign by the IC. just as the entirety of a 60s was a way to "simulate" a cultural awakening w out having to actually HAVE one.
who owns youtube, user?
who owns them?
theyre intel assets
some of them dont even make the worst entertainment desu, but theyre not to be taken seriously. they are intel assets
What are you even trying to say?
look up what a "gatekeeper" is
then watch some of these "controversial" videos
Literally who?
"the intellectual branch of the alt-right"
now go get in your little box goyim, and stay there
wtf? source on this image?
Do you ever think this could be because that is how the algorithm is designed in order to capture as much of your attention as possible?
There’s clearly a new media source growing with podcasts and YouTube conversations and such, and some of these people are just the forerunners.
Believe it or not, not everything is a nefarious conspiracy.
If someone garners a large following, obviously he or she will disseminate certain ideas. Not everything is a calculated move to control minds. No one is forcing consumption of the media that any of these individuals produce.
So many normie intellectuals in one room. Jordan Peterson is the best of the bunch by miles because he is at least well read on the thought and philosophy that came before modern liberalism.
>kermit was a post-modernist
Get a load of this kike.
Dude, the NWO/Illuminati/Jews aren't that competent. They're ancient boomers who are losing the culture war and getting desperate.
Just because the "intellectual dark web" doesn't agree with your retarded ethnostate doesn't mean they're also in a conspiracy. You sound like a deluded leftist.
To add
>Algorithm designed to capture as much attention as possible
So if you’re idiotically on right leaning content you will be spammed with their content.
Same goes for the left, or any other stupid gengre.
They’re the forerunners in their respective content that then gets spanned by YouTube to create a singularity of ideas.
I don't know about you fags, but I really get sexually aroused by them ((weinstein)) bros and their ridiculous clown wigs. Gotta love a kike confident to pull this shit off
>Believe it or not, not everything is a nefarious conspiracy.
then believe what you want
all these youtube debate faggots are being pushed simultaneously. sure many are just kids that monkey-see monkey-do. the heavily funded and backed ones are up top for a reason. absolute control of fringe ideas. this has always been an aspect of the ICs MO. dissidents make poor puppets
theres a reason there are still "dangerous" banned books, but these guys can give you a squishy TL;DR (heavily edited) version of these ideas.
polarization is the goal. you have one side spending all their time trying to shut this stuff down. the other side, simply enjoys hearing these points of views. now suddenly both of those groups want to kill each other and the gulf widens each day.
its a D&C campaign in the truest sense of the word. and it couldnt be more obvious to anyone who looks into the funding behind many of these fags
>Dude, the NWO/Illuminati/Jews aren't that competent.
again, an oversimplification of who is doing this.
imo the jews angle has been pushed because they re a popular fall guy. and also because pissing on them makes you an anti-semite who is not worth listening to.
the reality is that this is a much more intl organization
Why do Jews, more often than not, have a high verbal iq.?
You watch a lot of vox day or something??
Not an americunt so I'll happily return to my "box"
their culture places importance on high cognitive and verbal ability.
thats literally it.
i dont watch talking heads bud
read fucking books.
dont listen to these guys unless its just for fun
>again, an oversimplification of who is doing this.
>the reality is that this is a much more intl organization
And you're still giving them way too much credit. Even if the top 200 wealthiest individuals in the world were all meeting together for spirit cooking and to discuss world domination, they could only affect so much from the top down. They mastered TV and newspapers, but they are losing their grip on the internet.
Not a kike, just not a retarded 19 yo conspiracy NEET that browses pol.
sex on legs + brains too
I'm preheating the oven.
Well vox day is saying exactly what you are saying. What books independently brought you to these conclusions? I'm serious, I like to read, give me a short list to check out and/or most important books you'd recommend. I'd apprecite it.
cope
>Shapiro leaning away from the homosexual
BASED
find a list of banned books/ideas
start there
this is not something to be spoonfed, im afraid
also, unlike these talking heads, i do not wish you to think more like me, or more like some other ideal. i want you to think for yourself.
any effort on my part to paint you to one "side" or another, would be me being a useful idiot
You’re being way too sensationalist. Ben Shapiro is the only person in the group with funding. These people have become popular because “discussion sport” and “logic pwnage” have become popular forms of entertainment. Furthermore, podcasts are essentially like the printing press for spoken word, and it is a new media form that is really spreading. These guys aren’t shaping the culture any more than they’re appealing to desires for media that exist.
Some content creators just have a knack for appealing to large groups. This includes Ben Shapiro, Joe Rogan, and Jordan Peterson.
Imagine serving this table, not sure if I would be all "haha yeah I'm totally on your side" or act like a hyper liberal for the lols
What are the people in the picture? I dont know any of them.
can you tell to a brainlet from left to right who are those ppl?
Jordan Peterson
Eric Weinstein
Ben Shapiro
Dave Rubin
Joe Rogan
Sam Harris
Bunch of talking heads.
>Ben Shapiro
Thanks user, I never heard of them here in EU.
Jow Forums incel meetup
>You’re being way too sensationalist
correct
its shock treatment
>Ben Shapiro is the only person in the group with funding
incorrect
though i cannot post that info here
>These people have become popular because “discussion sport” and “logic pwnage”
because spoken word is easier to paint to one said or another than written word
again, i dont despise or disagree w many of the things these folks say. im suspicious of their sudden rise to fame, while being promoted as the anti-hero
regardless, for the introduction of new ideas, i trust ones own interpretation of written word over these youtube sponsored, one sided debates. this also allows for ones internal dialogue to discern what is right and wrong, and help formulate your own ideas. something very hard to do, when you just have someone who is good at speaking jabbering things that you already mostly agree with in your ear.
i see them almost like a support group. people retreat to the groups and ideas they most conform to, and dont branch out to other ones, to see what can be learned from the opposite side. why? because its hard to sit through a speech w someone you strongly disagree with. less so with books. one needs to keep a balance, and attempt to look at this all from multiple angles.
all im saying is this "phenomena" of a sudden surge in these "discussion sport" troubadours is contrived at best, and in the worst cases, malicious. none of these people are true ideologues. they simply take the place of them
All cucks, especially Rogan, le epic big brained centrist.
>epic big brained centrist.
another interesting meme
look up when THAT phrase came about in the lexicon
absolutely nothing wrong with looking at ideas you dont agree with. dont let anyone tel you otherwise
>intellectual dark web
>never mention jewish question
>full of jews
No, the others are funded by their audiences and/or self-selected sponsors. They aren’t backed by some organizations, groups, etc. Only Shapiro is.
Rubin is only one id like to hang out with - he’s bro-tier
Jordan only one i respect as a thinker - as a non jew he only rly call out marxism
Rogan, meathead that somehow rode the ufc/podcast wave.
This. It’s a discussion sport where the best orators win. The Written argumentation is vanishing or has vanished since YouTube/podcast is much easier to access to Normans.
>discussion sport where the best orators win
exactly
and as weve seen both historically and recently
best orators =/= best point
i feel its an attempt to push people even further away from written word (already quite successful). which is hands down, the best way to transmit ideas, as it allows ones inner dialogue to communicate with the idea, with nothing in between
Absolutely user. Absolutely.
Rubin receives funding from the Koch brothers. Peterson has worked with the UN and holds speeches for Monsanto. Both are neocon puppets.
We know Shapiro is owned by the Wilks family (who also own Ted Cruz). Sam Harris is a fake academic with famous parents, he got to where he is through nepotism.
Rogan may be the only "legit" one as he got o where he was on his own merits. Mind you he is an intellectual dwarf and a snake oil salesman.
didn't Harris only cowrite a single paper about neuroscience?
They always introduce him as a 'neuroscientist' while he only wites about philosophy.
Here is a great breakdown of that charlatan:
rhizzone.net
Notice the similarities between the 'Four Horsemen' and the 'Intellectual Dark Web'? Figures that a confidence man like Harris would find his way into both.
Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, Calvin Ayre, The 8btc mod (19hZx234vNtLazfx5J2bxHsiWEmeYE8a7k), Jiang Zhouer, the bitcoin.com cofounder, the Coinbase founder - all BILLIONAIRES who can complete the flippening with their own cash TODAY.
They're not doing so because they'd rather invest in BCH adoption. BCH adoption is skyrocketing while btc adoption is dropping.
In a few years both St Kitts and Antigua will use BCH as their main currency (Roger is working on St Kitts, Calvin is investing in Antigua more money than their GDP exclusively because of BCH adoption), Craig Wright will increase transaction counts by circumventing corrupt governments in Africa for money transfers (this one is not certain but very possible considering his funding), Roger is speaking to VIP-s every other day, including Japanese bank CEO-s, stock exchange owners, etc. Brian Armstrong will push BCH and shit on BTC subtly every chance he gets, bitcoin.com wallet is the most popular mobile wallet and it literally shits on BTC, propaganda/censorship effects are fading, Purse just added BCH meaning that normies can use it to get 20% discounts on amazon, Koreans love BCH and they seem to matter at least as much as Americans and significantly more than eurofags, miners are looking for ways to destroy BTC in the next few years otherwise their profits will crumble, LN is proving more and more of a failure every single day, Wright will patent-troll startups into moving into BCH, tipping on github is now possible with bch, smart contracts are coming in November, stress tests are a massive success, charities are popularizing BCH in struggling countries (Venezuela today, others will join in if trouble arises), Free Society project is progressing well, Circle is adding BCH next few weeks, Ayre who became a billionaire from gambling is going to create BCH-only online casinos
And of course everyone here is contrarian as always? Is there anyone you guys actually like?
*snnaaaap*
Liking people doesn't get you any (you)s
TOPKEK
Agree with this. Jordan Peterson seems alright though.
Death Grips live from the Nutty Putty when?
this shit is cringy
>intellectual
>Joe fucking Rogan
You keep using that work intellectual. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Leave Explosive Joseph alone
Imagine getting THIS butthurt about some random dudes posting youtube videos.
Harris tryin hard to hide that erection
Probably anticipating the boomer lemon party
(((Juden Peterstein)))
(((Eric Weinstein)))
(((Ben Shapiro)))
(((Dave Rubin)))
Joe Rogan (gatekeeping boomer fagit)
(((Sam Harris)))
It's the controlled kike oppo group for conservatards. They are all Jews except for Rogan, who is shabbos goy keeping his huge audience on the perpetual fence.
joe rogan is the only actual braindead faggot there, peterson can be a faggot but he's certainly not braindead. you have garbage taste in people.
good lord these are awful.
It makes me laugh how left wingers have been drawn into conflict with liberal centrists, anyone who thinks those guys are 'right wing' are going to be living in a nightmare soon
Okay nice cop out. I'll read mein kampf then and the masturbation parts of Anne Frank's diary. You could've thrown me a bone.
This
>>intellectual dark web
>muh conspiracies are this deep
delusional Poltard
maybe you should meditate and do dmt, it may fix your chemical imbalance
Sadly true, but from the extremes of both.
I am not purely centrist as some currently considered liveral ideology is baked into my beliefs, but it's painful to come into conflict with somebody over a minor disagreement that turns into a "we're enemies now!!" type of thing.
Also, I need to get back to books. user who discussed interal debate over written word versus spoken is correct.
All those people are "thought leaders" that run a business telling people what to think
same applies with the "alt right" or edgy nationalists or whatever and traditional right wingers
Is that Ben Stiller on the right?
No it doesn't, that's what I'm trying to tell you. People think Donald Trump and Libertarians are alt right, Trump would firmly be a democrat if you go back only 20 years.
To an extent he is correct about some of them anyway. Peterson in question draws heavily upon Jungian Psychology which is also the source of the Esoteric Nazism by way of Miguel Serrano who was at one point a close friend of Jung and his family. Serrano only used started using Jungian Psychology after some pro-national socialist tracts were written by Jung that placed Hitler as the archetype of the collective unconscious of the German people and possesses them driving them to embody that archetypal ideal themselves. Furthermore, according to Serrano Jung had created this concept of the two collective unconsciousness that was helpful to the NS cause but was later redacted from all of his later collected writings and only exists in a 1930's Spanish edition of his work (Though he doesnt explain what the concept was). The point being that Peterson is a gatekeeper in the sense he determines the way people will hear about the ideas of Jung and read his texts which themselves still have a strong influence in the far-right which people get into by way of the alt-right. The atomwaffen division draw heavily upon the works of Serrano, therefore Jung, as the basis of discussion and presumably for some of their beliefs.
>except rogan
yes. I have retard basement dwelling white nationalist larpers call me a basedboy and faggot and nigger Lover and dumb liberal sjw scum if I say something like the black community is the shape it is because of systematic oppression from both left and right side of government for the purpose of having a welfare dependant and entirely controllable under class. Polcucks think it's being sympathetic and refusing to acknowledge "racial iq" then I'm also called a liberal sjw faggot if I say that the pitiful public education system is also part of the systematic oppression
How much total IQ does Jow Forums propose is sitting at that there table?
800?
Dude all these people are dishonest as fuck. Name the fucking Jew! Harris criticizes all religions except one. Can you guess what it is?