What did IOTA Cofounder mean by this?

>Come from Beyond and Nazarov have a long history together.

Explain.

Could you publish "CFB is not Satoshi" signed with #Bitcoin genesis address if you finally managed to recover the data from that HDD?

He wants him to publish from bitcoin genesis address from a hard drive. Does not mention who's hard drive.

Checked. Explain

look at nxt secure asset exchange

where do I start. If you want to read up on their connections you will have to search sergey nazarov, bcnext (who is come from beyond confirmed), NXT.

They are both bitcoin pioneers. Sergey registered smart contract before the bitcoin whitepaper was released. Many though Sergey was BCNext but it was actually Come from Beyond. They both worked side by side at NXT. There are many other connections as well

THIS MEANS SERGEY LURKS Jow Forums. HI SERGEY!!!

Attached: 1524109488055.png (400x350, 82K)

Ah right, I remember that now.

Well, it seems they keep in touch then, or at least are in familiar terms, its likely that they talked about Qubic and Chainlink then.

They worked together on SAE and more importantly CfB is a huge troll

blog.iota.org/qubic-status-update-july-3rd-2018-e176ee132b79?source=rss-------1

Dude just asked him to try to recover data from his old HDD. It's not a big deal. You're reading way too much into it. Do you really think Sergey Nazarov would want people to know he's actually the guy who created Bitcoin right before his new project launches? I don't.

Kind of makes aense given his age. The recent paper Satoshi made says he was too young to be taken seriously

Can someone with enough technical understanding give us an estimate of how likely it is that Iota Qubic uses Chainlink?
Would that even work with the tangle?

Shut the fuck up

Hence why the tweet went on deaf ears. And where does it say its Come from beyond's hard drive. It sounds like its Nazarov's hard drive considering he has it.

Why wouldn't he?

Gives him a ton of cringworthy crypto cred

Confirmed. Astro is both Sergey and a massive faggot.

Attached: 1527179071242.jpg (640x360, 35K)

Bitcoin and Blockchain

commie tech

Chainlink is blockchain agnostic. It can run on IOTA very easily. DESU it would be foolish for IOTA to implement oracles on their own considering they are having enough problems with tangle and progress as it is. But if successful, the tangle and IOTA would give chainlink a platform where there is no gas cost which would lower the premium for chainlink calls significantly.

CFB and sergey = NXT

NXT

This shit makes me want to buy more links....

how old is sergey searched on the google can not find it

Older than the trees, younger than the mountains.

do you actually think sergey exists in physical form?

$1000 EOY

Attached: Screenshot_2018-07-05_01-16-13.png (1366x768, 157K)

>Shut the fuck up
Eat your nuggets.

Attached: It was predicted long ago.jpg (771x960, 132K)

My understanding is 32. Would also not be surprised if he was connected to Satoshi in some way.

>The recent paper Satoshi made says he was too young to be taken seriously
What do you mean "the recent paper"?
He's been MIA for almost a decade.

Sergey is waiting until he is 33 for mainet release. He believes he is an avatar of God.

Still disappointed. Not ready yet.

If it did come out that sergay was undeniably Satoshi, link would dump to the single digits.

Hey dude.

Thanks for all the hard work.

Thank you for saving my family's lives.

I would have unironically killed myself in a couple years, but fate had it I found this project and it gave me hope in a better future.

Attached: 1524965653006.png (556x420, 423K)

I think everyone in the crypto scene knows who/what Satoshi is. If it's news to you then you aren't supposed to know.

you mean 3 digits. if the identity of the founder of BTC gets confirmed and everyone finds out he currently is working on another project that shit will shoot up straight too top 3 position within a month

i think it's curious bitfinex hasn't listed link. if chainlink really is as big a deal as you think it is, wouldn't the shadiest most manipulative exchange want in on it? unless they were in on the ico?

Bitfinex gets permission from devs to do that, or usually devs approach them and pay a fee to get listed. Binance listed link because it was a new small exchange and didnt give a fuck to ask devs.

Trips of truth

I've read this over and over again... what is the sauce on this? Did binance really list link without out their permission?

source?

Attached: You got it.png (640x361, 86K)

Imagine sergey was satoshi and the absurd pump link would have based on it

It would be number 1 in a week after people read a bit about link

Binance was brand new at the time LINK ICO happened. There was a Binance rep who came into the Chainlink slack asking to get it listed. That obviously would never happen now, but at the time Chainlink was a super hot ICO getting a lot of buzz.

Yes. Won't spoonfeed you. Not only Sergey didn't ask to be listed on binance. He was clearly pissed about it, that's when the huge radio silence began, most likely because they didn't want to market link in such an early state and because burgers were allowed in the Ico.

Attached: 028AD7C9-51CD-4732-9615-973FD4FC6C84.jpg (339x449, 38K)

Iota won't need LINK you mong

not asking for a spoon. At this point hodlers are going to hodl. Buyers already bought. Was at 16Cents last week. At this point, either you're in, or you're out. Super pissed about the Sell wall price suppression for last 2 days though. 750,000 sell wall first at 3950sat, then they moved it down 3700 sat. As soon as it got eaten into, they pull it. At this point, how can you not be done accumulating

meh, I was 'done accumulating' months ago. but 4 linkies for a dollar? how can you pass up?

$1000 EOY

Attached: 1530329610725.gif (320x212, 1.08M)

they don't even have a whitepaper or even a roadmap for qubic...believe me they need chainlink if they want to save a year