EU parliament approves internet copyright law

futurism.com/the-eu-agreed-on-the-final-text-of-a-meme-ban/?fbclid=IwAR3uLw9vYR548MtDtVPxW0liCoL3XdwuWZVpUMtV3-HyxTx0FaalLj5kCjE

Good bye Euro friends

Attached: the-eu-agreed-on-the-final-text-of-a-meme-ban-768x403.jpg (768x403, 62K)

Another massive victory for EU

>copyright/patent law
thanks jews

Please dont confuse copyright with patents. Patents are important, copyright infringement is almost impossible to enforce on internet. Not even worth legislation.

Both are jewish inventions made to legalize monopoly.
The world progressed at a much swifter rate before those things were introduced because everyone could learn, copy and improve on existing ideas.

>The world progressed at a much swifter rate before those things were introduced because everyone could learn, copy and improve on existing ideas.
But it didnt and you can still learn-copy- and improve existing ideas.

As long as you dont claim you created the existing idea- feel free to make it better.

>As long as you dont claim you created the existing idea- feel free to make it better.
Yes goyim, feel free to make it better with your own, so we can get our lawyers to sue your ass because your patent magically infringes on 28 our patents so you're left with a choice of going bankrupt or entering a very infavourable patent cross-licensing scheme where you get shafted anyways, because we, the big corporation can make your patented shit cheaper.

Patent law is fucking communism.

>Patent law is fucking communism.
If that were true patents wouldnt exist and everything would belong to central government.

Attached: 1547761356726.png (500x482, 353K)

>IF I DUN HAVE IT IT AUTOMAGICALLY BECUMS GUBERMENT PROPERTY AND WE CAN'T HAVE THAT CAN WE

Attached: 1543947635524.jpg (552x496, 22K)

>improving someones patent to make it a more efficient and new machine will automatically get you slapped with patent infringement.
Patents are owned by the creator, so its literally the opposite of communism.

Attached: superthumb.jpg (300x250, 21K)

>Patents are owned by the creator, so its literally the opposite of communism.
Patents enable monopoly.

Monopoly = communism.

>Patents enable monopoly.
If you concede patents are owned by creators- which are individuals- then it by definition cannot be communism. Also, again- patents and copyright are different.

Patents are inherently anti capitalist you corporatism shill, if you have a idea and cant make it as good as someone else you dont deserve to be able to hold on to it as a barging chi p delaying progress like the greedy jew you are

patents are indeed a tool to suppress healthy competition which is bad for the market and the consumers.

Its not throu yet thou. There will de a final vote on it on the European Parliament, and considering how unpopular the law is and considering that there will be EP elections pretty much right after that vote, its possible that it will not pass.

>if you have a idea and cant make it as good as someone else you dont deserve to be able to hold on
Im going to assume you're uneducated and use this as a opportunity to teach you.

>if you have a idea and cant make it as good as someone else you dont deserve to be able to claim you created that other persons idea- whist doing NOTHING at all to improve or change that person initial idea -which was lightyears ahead of you

Attached: 1526839055391.gif (288x377, 1.83M)

yes but right now there care company's that can just hire hundreds of engineers to think of things that are possible in theroy and slap pantents on them not know whether or not they will ever make those items so when someone who actually has the copcaity to make the item they can sue the shit out of them and shut them down

I bought a bundle of small vpses around the world when sites started blocking access due to the gdpr, so I'm ready for this

>spend billions designing new technology
>random guy can just take the technology and make it himself without spending billions on developing it
>dude just make it cheaper lmao

hey remember when the UK government thought a ban on internet porn would be a good thing to introduce, then had to quietly drop the idea when they realised it was a fucking stupid and completely unenforceable?