Why are the French less harsh when it comes to Nergos? In WWI, the French let the Harlem Hellfighters fight with native French troops. This wasn't a thing in Britian or America.
Why are the French less harsh when it comes to Nergos? In WWI...
Britain was never as hateful as the US.
>Hateful as the US
What do you mean?
French be BLACK unlike whit*oid angl*s.
french has colonial blacks too so american blacks aren't that different
british colonial troops in africa were white but they did have asian troops from nepal and india
French are chill bros and not a bunch of insecure small dick betas like english and usa
Why the fuck are you including us in your racial autism? We are/were nothing like you people when it comes to treating blacks.
Afaik we didn't particularly treat them any better than other European powers
>Why the fuck are you including us in your racial autism
What are you talking about? We didn't treat our Negros that badly.
LMFAO
M
F
A
O
Imagine being this retarded.
>We didn't treat our Negros that badly
idk
Not even half-decent bait, very disappointing.
Apply yourself next time.
Metropolitan France had a population of around 39 million in 1914.
Germany was around 65 million. This is without including the other Central Powers.
You work it out.
I'm not joking. Other than being sergrated (which they wanted) and not being allowed to fight, they were treated okay-ish.
Yeah, but they could have been like the British and kept them separate but they didn't. Why?
i don't know about the military, but in culture, i think french people have a taste for exuberance and funny grotesque shit. Wich is typical of black culture i think.
See Depardieu, Gargantua...
vimeo.com
You're the ones who brought them in the first place, thanks for that by the way.
>Why the fuck are you including us in your racial autism? We are/were nothing like you people when it comes to treating blacks.
Ancient americans were british user
>I'm not joking.
Well then you're just fucking stupid and me accusing you of baiting was giving you far too much credit.
You had your little revolution, your problems are yours, and yours alone.
This is the answer BTW.
The US 369th Infantry Regiment:
>served the longest and spent the most time at the front out of any American regiment
>never lost ground
>never had a prisoner taken
>suffered the highest amount of casualties out of any US regiment
>only failed to take an objective a single time
yet they never got an ounce of respect when they returned to the states and lived the rest of their lives in destitution and misery.
There is a difference between ignorance and stupidity. If I am missing something enlighten me.
The UK was never under demographic pressure as severe as France was. Widespread integration didn't take place until manpower was bottoming out.
Back during the World Wars American troops stationed here had to be told by your own guys that we didn't discrimiate the way you guys did back in the States, and to leave their racism back home.
theconversation.com
>In his essays George Orwell alluded to the oft-quoted assertion that American GIs were “oversexed, overpaid and over here”.
>But he qualified this with the observation that: “the general consensus of opinion is that the only American soldiers with decent manners are Negroes.”
The french promised their colonies conscripts respect (and shit like that)for them and their countries, but when they returned after the wars they still faced discrimination and saw their people suffer. In algeria, there were ones who the french even tried to assassinate.
>Muh respect
Should've asked for cool clothes like the congolese did.
Because French are cucks and love BBC
Simple as
>tf
>tp
Truly obsessed, is it because of Québec? Don't worry, maybe you will have a culture...someday.
Was that before or after they got their hands cut by the belgians ?
French were known as the negro lovers back then
They pushed this Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité a bit to far
and still are
>Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité
This is a based ethos. Fuck off to Jow Forums Helmut.
>pronouns can be optional if more information is needed
>be babol to yam - I talk
What is that "more information" that this provides over just "babol (I talk)"?
>to
I regret creating it. At least it makes sense now unlike the fuckery happening last night but it's still completely not what I wanted it to be.
I've done some googling and it looks like what I wanted "to" to be would be called something like a verb phrase marker, I guess. en.wikipedia.org
to = subject does that has something to do with to the object
>im going to sleep
That would be "naroz to hotot" or "naroz to hotot".
>Pabij to hotot.
>pabij = I fuck it; hotot = to want
>I (subject) want to (verb2) fuck (verb1) it (object).
A few more examples, this time from that Wikipedia article I linked to show that my idea kinda fits into the definition provided there.
>They want to try that.
Niitir to hotot.
>She kept screaming.
Shiroy to robor.
>Thou shall not kill
Bevot to donod (literally do not kill)
sh r y (German)
shoroy
to scream
r b r (Greek)
robor
to do something continuously for a period of time
Maybe I should consider changing "to" to something else if I still want to force my idea, cause it's hard to fight with the way you use "to" now.
because the blacks own their females
In Texas, ca. 1920, the Texas Rangers crossed the border into Arkansas and arrested a black man accused of raping his former employers daughter. This was illegal as fuck, there was no trial that I know of.
That man was taken back to Waco, tied to a post in front of a crowd of people, and burned at the stake. The crowd had popcorn vendors, and later the ashes were sifted through so the bones could be kept as sourveniers. To the best of my knowledge the UK hasn't burned a kidnap victim at the stake without a trial in some time.
the reason was racism. France didn't have black slaves, and for the most part was done with class bullshit after the fall of Napoleon III. The black troops of WWI even were held in amnity by the atheist accepting french freemasons, some american masons still don't think blacks should be welcome.
you lost both wars, put curry sauce on your sausages like retards, and all 6000 types of beer you people make taste the fucking same.
then recognize quebec as a republic
yes.
>texas rangers
based and redpilled
The South doesn't count as part of America though.
>France didn't have black slaves
Maybe not IN France. You seem educated enough that I'm hoping you're not so retarded as to believe they weren't brutal slavers overseas.
it's nothing but make believe
en.wikipedia.org
It was in 1916 and the woman in question was raped+murdered, also she was an immigrant from the UK. Also he was actually tried, regardless of whether or not the gruesome outcome was acceptable (which it wasn't because the Constitution forbids cruel and unusual punishment).
Jesus.
>regardless of whether or not the gruesome outcome was acceptable (which it wasn't because the Constitution forbids cruel and unusual punishment).
ah yes, but if the constitution said it was alright then there'd be no problem
lmao
and what the fuck were they doing in Europe again?
>live the rest of their lives in misery
not really and living among White people is not a right lmao