Based wagecucks BTFO.
Based wagecucks BTFO
That's easy to do when Big Papi Trump makes you pay 0 taxes twice in a row
I miss the days when something like 1/3 of the work force was unionized.
in finland, trade unions have been hampering any efforts for employment reforms for well over a decade now and as a result finland still has one of the highest unemployed rates in the EU, our trade unions have basically become trustees for low-skilled workers over the age of 50
only 11 Billion profit? wtf that's less than Bezos is worth
His "worth" is just because he owns a lot of shares from a fuckhuge company though, he's not actually richer than someone like Bill Gates who can actually just write a check for 20 billion USD and wipe his ass with it.
do thirdies actually believe Bill Gates has 20bn USD in liquid assets lying around?
I’m a pro-union guy but it seems that it’s extremely difficult to find the labor-corporate balance sweet spot. Seems unions are either corrupt entitled lazy upjumped NEETs or powerless cucks who have to acquiesce every demand to keep their work from going overseas. If the union exists at all.
Why is this?
*gets exposed for being a philanderer*
*sues them*
He's on the track to become the next Elon Musk
the only people who like unions are the 50 yr old boomers doing FUCK ALL for 4 hours a day when they should be working, fucking union privileged fucks.
Bill Gates is exactly the same as Bezos, but less rich. And at least Bezos developed a decent service unlike Gates who just abused copyright law.
Right to work is a start.
Forcing workers to join shitty unions that blees their paychecks with dues and do fuck all to represent them is pretty shitty, but say you're in support of right to work legislation and suddenly you're an antiunion scab
Maybe somewhere, Germany, Italy? unions work, I want vacations, 2hour lunch, weekends off, health insurance, etc
>I like unions BUT....
Bill Gates is white therefore better than Bezos who is a jew
There are many reasons why union can be criticized
case in point: Argentinian unions. They'll burn down the country before conceding to better work practices. At the same time, some union bosses also don't give a fuck and are cronies with the government.
The subway workers union got away with wages around 2 to 3 times higher than average, and work hours at about half. They hold the city transport by the balls if they get bitchy. There's been cases of workers getting bullied because "they worked too hard" and "were making the rest look bad and as if they were capable of doing more work"
The commerce union on the other hand paid shit wages, had their workers work 46-48 hours a week instead of the usual 40, and made it an absolute legal mess to get part time jobs in the sector. Little to no benefits too.
>unions aren't perfect
>so let's have no unions...which gives even worse results
epic
Oh, and I forgot, you usually can't resign to a union. You got a job as a teacher? At a private school? Out of your own accord? Yeah, the teachers' union will keep about 11% of your wage, like it or not. The only way not to give up part of your wage to a union is to not be on one, and you can only do that as an independent worker or on the armed forces.
And there are a ton of laws to prevent companies hiring independent workers, so the bulk of the employed population has to contribute to a union.
Besos is a white white a adopted cuban father.
We need a Nazbol revolution so fucking bad. These kikes need to be stopped.
Bet there is people defending this lmao. Bootlickers have no shame
Why did a tabloid fuck with the world's richest man and think they could get away with it?
Every time the workers go for a strike here their leaders or just some of them got visited by very kind and intelligent people reasonably telling them and their family that such kinds of behaviour is bad and they should reconsider their decisions. The organisation is called FSD or FSB, something like that
>World's richest person
>Not even one word in the article about the Rothschilds
>There's been cases of workers getting bullied because "they worked too hard" and "were making the rest look bad and as if they were capable of doing more work"
>grown men being bullied
it is indeed since most unions that grow powerful enough will never agree for any compromise solutions, whereas non-unionized industries just usually get fucked in the ass by corporates
finland has an extraordinarily large boomer generation so as a result we're pretty much fucked in the future no matter what, as it'll be extremely hard to pass any substantial labour reforms until the boomers have either died or gone into a vegetative state
FUCK capitalism.
BACK TO YOUR WAGECAGE WAGIES
Don't make big boss Bezos come after you
Now imagine being a janny
>he thinks companies make money by profit
what year is it, grandpa, 1650?
There really is no balance to be found. Unions attempt to mimick the effects of legislature through forming labor cartels and monopolizing supply. This naturally leads to corruption because they grow fairly profitable. Any sort of personal incentive quickly favors those who are willing to put aside moral scruples.
The way to guarantee decent conditions without strangling the industry is making laws, but that begets the next question of how to do that.
There really is no answer. It's always going to be a tug of war, and you have to hope that it will not go too far either way.
For me it's the bolshevizm
they do all this... but for free...