do people in your country understand liquidity
USA
no
do people in your country understand liquidity
USA
no
do soyboys think ending world hunger means giving out food?
well, 2bh if you give every man on earth a pizza they wouldnt be hungry.
for an hour or 2
Stocks are pretty liquid. It's not like Bezos' wealth is mostly historical artworks or houses or whatever
Yes. However we need communism now. It's not ethical to let parasites accumulate that much wealth.
Why are Leftists so dumb?
Hunger and poverty is not something you can end with a single payment.
bezos could not possibly sell all of his shares without crashing the market
The company is valuable whether he owns it or not. He doesn't even have to give up control to divest equity
Nobody has the majority of their networth in cash. We can still criticize the incredible and increasing wealth inequality.
This is so stupid
Why have none of these people ever passed basic math? And I'm not talking about uni level, high school tier in canada at least had 3 years of finance/business classes etc where you learn this
Were these the retards smoking weed instead of going to class?
Every time hunger is ended the niggers multiply and go hungry again.
>166K likes
This is why the CIA killed commies in their sleep.
Commie rhetorics will always seduce the dumb lazy masses but it's all of us who will share the consequences of Communism.
Also when will white people realize they're the top 5%? If the rest of the world decided to "eat the rich" it's our asses that will be on the run.
Yes, i do understand water. Quite a bit lad
Ah yes famously Marx said that we should kill whoever falls in the top 5% of earners worldwide.
That's the whole point of socialism.
Surely the minimum wage worker that is forced to take two jobs to make ends meet in the first world is the cause of the impoverishment of third world countries, I remember Engels writing that
You fucking braindead Jow Forumsyp, the money wouldn't be used to buy everyone a meal. That sort of funding would be used to set up infrastructure, transport, warehousing, etc.
Ending long-term hunger by
>funding would be used to set up infrastructure, transport, warehousing, etc.
would be more expensive that all of the world's billionaries' fortunes combined.
...BUT BUT DADDY BEZOS CANT LIQUIDATE ALL OF HIS ASSETS IN A MOMENTS NOTICE THAT DISPROVES THE EXISTENCE OF WEALTH INEQUALITY LIBTARD
real bootlicker hours
>if we can't provide a perfect solution to an existing problem we better do nothing at all
>end world hunger for a day
>people are still hungry the next day
>confused liberals
LOL
Russians killed the lowest IQ poor.
China killed the highest IQ rich.
You have to get rid of outliers to homogenise your population
Well he could certainly feed all hungry people at least once
and what do you reckon happens when you suddenly remove malthusian pressures in nations where the total fertility rate is 7
lol no
Bezos was already in the top 30 landowners in the USA, back in 2011. That was when he was "only" worth around 19 billion USD. Since then he has been buying more and more real estate for whatever the fuck it is he likes to do, including an entire mountainside where he using a cave system to develop some horological monstrosity designed to accurately keep time for the rest of human history, or some shit.
He could hire some mercs to kill all the starving people and end world hunger.
Fertility rate goes down when living standards get better.
>its another "stupid mutt licking his masters boots again" thread
>Fertility rate goes down when living standards get better.
Fertility rate goes down when having children becomes economically disadvantageous for the average household. While that does indeed tend to be the case in countries with better living standards, it is in no way a hard and fast rule.
The problem will fix itself as countries naturally develop overtime and resources become more scarce.