I'd like to highlight the following:

I'd like to highlight the following:

1. The fact that a big company like PWC France has dedicated an article to Req in their website is big. This company wouldn't risk talking about the partnership for no reason or if Req wasn't good enough. In my opinion they have done this to create more visibility and add credibility so that other big companies interested in blockchain can read about it in their website. If I had a company I would trust what PWC says over anything I can read on reddit/telegram and so on.

2.PwC France says the following:

- PwC and Req are equaly interested in creating and constructing an ecosystem at an international level.

- "We greet ourselves for this new collaboration with one of the most innovative teams of the blockchain ecosystem worldwide".

- "Request Network is an international foundation whose applications are already attracting the attention of international organizations, companies, and governments as this technology allows considerable efficiency and productivity gains through the automation of financial functions such as billing, payments, accounting or taxes."

3. About this partnership and the blockchain lab. Projects they are currently working on:

- The design and development of a prototype for the issue, exchange, settlement and administration of syndicated bank loans for a major banking group.

- The implementation of a smart retail trade finance solution for a major European bank.

- The development of a blockchain prototype for the reinsurance market involving reinsurers, brokers and assignors.

- The Proof of Concept of a securities settlement system for a national bank.

- The implementation of a national exchange by blockchain.

Of course they are not going to tell the name of these banks, companies, governments, etc... They are a serious company and have to preserve the identity of their clients. But this is definitely awesome!

Attached: 92C18EBA-29FC-4669-8262-8C0718105D4A.jpg (512x512, 11K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pwc.fr/fr/espace-presse/communiques-de-presse/2018/juillet/pwc-france-afrique-francophone-s-associe-a-la-fondation-request-network.html
gilded.finance
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

pwc.fr/fr/espace-presse/communiques-de-presse/2018/juillet/pwc-france-afrique-francophone-s-associe-a-la-fondation-request-network.html

I don’t know what any of those things they’re working on are. Can someone explain each of them in simple ways? I’m all in on REQ btw.

FRENCH REPORTING IN
1) PWC is shit
2) REQ is already dead, only delusional faggots still trade it
3) France won't be able to handle the crypto game, just like we were unable to do it with internet. Why? Because people who make the laws are +70 y/o boomers

nt pajeet

It only needs to go back to 1$ for me to break even. Only a matter of days.

nt delusional heavy bag holder

et va te faire enculer je suis pas un indien ;)

You are 100% pajeet if you really think that pwc is shit and req is dead.

You need to switch things up, I can tell who you are in each req thread

>FRENCH REPORTING IN
And that's relevant because...?
>PWC is shit
Says who and why
>REQ is already dead
What does dead mean, and who says it's dead
>only delusional faggots still trade it
Again, who says this and what's their argument?
>France won't be able to handle the crypto game, just like we were unable to do it with internet. Why? Because people who make the laws are +70 y/o boomers
Yeah I'm sure you're some kind of prophet user

Attached: 1518840548233s.jpg (221x250, 8K)

You posted this on reddit. No one cares about your shilling on here. Give me proof that PwC will actually benefit the value of the Req token directly, then I’ll care. The most likely scenario is that PwC borrows Req’s technology for its own private accounting blockchain. In a nutshell, PwC will have used the Req team and left them behind.

Great news! It might only drop 25% now!

>The most likely scenario is that PwC borrows Req’s technology for its own private accounting blockchain.
Dude you just went full retard

Attached: 1231232.jpg (588x823, 62K)

To explain further, it’s pretty obvious to me this is going to happen. It’s not like Req has a patent on its technology. What incentive is there for PwC to A) post accounting data on Req’s public ledger and B) commit any resources that would benefit the average Req token holder? It’s a pipe dream that PwC is going to help you, the average Req investor. It’s more likely to benefit the Req team members and/or PwC’s bottom line. Don’t be surprised if you get burnt.

And you don’t even have a detailed counter argument.

Good luck on having SECURE private blockchain.

btw this same ''private blockchain'' fud is always so retarded.

checked

You literally do not understand the blockchain

Oh please. Clearly you've never worked with someone from one of the Big 4 before because this reads like the most generic associate level bullshit article that someone could come up with. It literally has every fucking buzzword that these consultants are bred to use from day one and literally says nothing of substance. And a cursory glance at their other articles reveal the same fluff pieces that are also common place on Deloitte, Boston Consulting Group and McKinsey's websites. But sure this is FUD so you know buy 100k and shit you dumb niggers.

Will this piece of shit hit a dollar?

Req is trash and most of accounting work consists of business consulting which REQ could never replace. REQ will just be a better version of Quickbooks.

>better version of quick books
>everything done on REQ will burn tokens
You say that like it’s a bad thing

Easily. I can see even 50$ in long-term.

I know more than you do. Name a single big business that wants all of its transactions publicly available. There aren’t. And they sure as shit aren’t going to be posting their data on the Ethereum blockchain. I’m aware that a centralized private blockchain conflicts with the very advantages of a blockchain, which by definition should be decentralized, but that’s not how these enterprise companies like PwC approach it. I can guarantee you if—a big if—PwC has transactions on a blockchain it will be at least partially sequestered, and it certainly won’t be directly burning Req tokens.

Why don’t we hit 50 cents before this nonsense $50 talk. The Req community, which I am a part of, is too full of delusions and not intelligent enough to constructively criticize the project.

Exactly. If you read the last Req update, they state they haven’t even begun coding anything with PwC or for am accounting app. It’s all theoretical right now and in discussion. Req shillers, stfu until something concrete actually occurs. Otherwise you have a fucking $50 million dollar beta crowdfunding app and that’s it.

That's not even an argument. He makes a great point.

Attached: 4B02D88C-A381-44F1-BB9C-76E2C66B4724.png (194x259, 3K)

>I can see even 50$ in long-term.

lel, get fucked bagholder.

If the team delivers, REQ $10k EO2019 is a fact.

>tfw staking and burning these tokens means i will sell just ONE of my thousands of tokens for hundreds of dollars in 2 years

LMFAOOO GET FUCKED REQ FUDDERS

Again, you have no detailed response. Instead, just memes. Typical immature investor with no understanding of what you’ve thrown your money at. Thx for showing me a portrait of your face.

Screenshotted

do you not disagree a private blockchain is far less secure than a public one due to being 100% centralized and thus prone to an attack?

Nice dubs

Last time i heard of PWC working with a crypto it was with vechain.

decided to be a risky cunt and throw my conservatively diverse portfolio into like a significant amount of REQ - when it was like roughly 80c

it's now 8c, one fucking TENTH the price and i hate myself for the decision

i'm just holding for eternity because all my money is just profits from getting lucky on the BTC hype, but fuck my life still

lol aren't these the same guys that lost a fucking partnership with wikipedia? how weird and creepy do you have to be to lose that lol?
im a girl and his req stuff makes me feel uncomfortable, user. why do you care that the price went up by 3 cents? isn't bitcoin worth 9000? buy that instead

>>FRENCH REPORTING IN
Opinion discarded.

Bump for justice
$7 eoy ! Per token not mcap.
Eo2018.

Does REQ have staking?

no staking, just burning. don't forget to lock your tokens on your ledger to avoid the burning contract

It's most likely moving to it's own tendermint sidechain. It will have staking if it does this.

>hurr durr private blockchains
Reminds me of dotcom when people thought most shit wouldn't be put on the public internet.

No, not yet. But it will have. There will be staking, burning (already working) and some kind of voting system to allow for the token to appreciate in value considerably.

Why so bitter?
In a few months to a year you'll have 10x of what you invested in REQ.
So be patient and wait out the bear market you fuck

Bump

most common a deluded REQ holder in the marketing team

>REQ

Attached: dustpepe.jpg (960x960, 108K)

>most shit wouldn't be put on the public internet

You don't actually think most shit is on the 'public' internet do you?

Well yeah pretty much everything goes through the public internet infrastructure. Only things that it makes sense to not have on the public internet are government agencies like the NSA/pentagon/white house where these agencies would have their own specific cabling running between them. Everything else goes through the same public wires. Just like everything will go through the same public blockchains. Doesn't mean you will see it, but it will be there.

What is this on the Request Network subreddit?

If you’re interested in invoicing, my team is building a full featured crypto invoicing tool powered by REQ. Our private beta starts this week. We also have a free invoicing tool available now which does not provide any kind of payment processing. Feel free to give it a try (and signup for the beta if you like) at gilded.finance

On their website it seems as though they have two daaps that they are currently developing:

Crypto Invoicing
Send an invoice priced in fiat or crypto
Accept payment in BTC, ETH, LTC, or NANO
Use your existing wallets
100% free. Go for it!

Accounting for Crypto Businesses
Track payments to employees and vendors
Automaticly convert currencies
Monitor and categorize wallet transactions
Easy export for tax reporting

Is REQ going to be able to accept BTC, ETH, LTC, or NANO pretty soon? How is that Gilded team going to do that if their daaps are powered by REQ which does not accept BTC, LTC, or Nano? Did groups from those communities approach REQ and agree to create oracles for those currencies?

Req $100 eoy

Interesting to see people developing on top of Request.

There might be something to this shitcoin...

>People here STILL dont understand that a private blockchain is useless fundamentally and it would be cheaper for PWC to use REQ than develop it themselves.

Dont fall for the FUD rats spouting vitriol, yallz

I think you meant to say "likely"

What are your honest feelings about the platform now that you've had a chance to develop on it?