Why is everyone here more fascinated by Europe than the Americas?

I like Swedish cinema.

Attached: Det.Sjunde.Inseglet.jpg (740x439, 144K)

Because even the shittiest European countries are better than those latin american third world shithole countries you listed.

Exceot for crime i guess.
And i dont see anything separating them as a people.
Look at my neighbour hungary, at leastnwe speak a different language, have different culture and stuff.
I dont think anyone would notice crossing thode jungles in america that they are different countries

I heard it's good, but I'm not a movie person.

I have to admit, I thought for the longest time that Uruguay is in Africa. I still can't point it out on a map, feels american man.

>Uruguay or Panama or Peru or Guatemala or Dominican Rep or Malta or Colombia or Honduras?
Literally all the same.

Conquistadors/colonizers killing and raping the locals, building some churches and shit, 5 million years of gang wars and favelas.

Compare that to any european country with hundreds/thousands of years of rich culture and history. Literally anything important the last 2000 years happened in Europe, with USA joining in the last 200-300 years.

Because white countries tend to be first world while brown countries tend to be third world.

I can't relate to third world stuff. It's alien to me. Us white people can relate to each other.

Is there anything in south america aside from druglords and jungle?

I come here for you user.

The Americas are Spanish rapebabies with no culture

Not really. Panama and Uruguay have a better GDP per capita than countries like Albania or Romania. Amerishart talking out of his ass, nothing new.

SA arr rook same

West-western europe only has like 3 ethnicities in total. You've got your engliniggers, spaniggers and portuniggers and thats it, it's not very interesting.

You are sure hellbent in changing this.

Wouldn't be hard to beat Romania mate
Scottish, Welsh, Irish, French, and the various historic peoples they're all descended from

It's more like putting third worlders in designated areas and give them gibs for free to not do too much crime and leave us alone in order to virtue signal how "good hearted" and "equal" we are.

I know, it's pretty messed up.

Tranny

For me, it's gallo pinto

Trendy vibrant cultures and nice people.
>Conquistadors/colonizers killing and raping the locals, building some churches and shit, 5 million years of gang wars and favelas.
South American history is pretty interesting, the Bolivian war itself is worth a read into.
>Compare that to any european country with hundreds/thousands of years of rich culture and history. Literally anything important the last 2000 years happened in Europe
On what kind of scale are you even referring to? Dumb post desu.
with USA joining in the last 200-300 years.
American dominance was beginning to take form in the 19th century but they wouldn't be a contender until around half a century later.

idk about other euro countries but here Peruvian cuisine is pretty hype these days

>On what kind of scale are you even referring to? Dumb post desu.
Science, industry, wars, culture, philosophy, politics, i.e. major human advances and deciding events. You're the dumb one.

I like south america, specially mayan and inca culture

Culture

America is all slave descended blacks with no culture, asian descended natives with no culture, and white people with culture cheaply copied from europe

Most of these advances came after Renaissance and really bloomed during the Industrial Revolution however.
>You're the dumb one
No

Malta is European

Why are non-Europeans so entitled? We don't HAVE to talk about you

>Ancient Greece
>Rome
>The Catholic Church
And your post doesn't change that fact that by and large almost everything of note in the last thousand years happened in Europe

>social welfare
What's that?

History doesn't end after Rome fell.
There's still the Mongols, Ottomans, Sassanids, Timur, Rashidun, Ummayads, Song, Seljuks, Afsharids and Qings for just some off the top of my head.
>And your post doesn't change that fact
Yeah, sure

>History doesn't end after Rome fell.
Never said it did? And none of those that you listed have left a mark on the world to the same extent as Brits, French, Germans, Swedes, Swiss, Italians etc

This isn't a competition m8 but you're making it out to be one because you lack reading comprehension from what was originally said . They shaped the region's that they were set on completely.

You're right. Mongols had a far greater impact than all those combined.

What about us do you find interesting?

>Mongols had a far greater impact than all those combined

Attached: soy.jpg (189x267, 12K)

I could get into how each of those reshaped Asia and Europe (especially the Rashidun wew) but this board doesn't deserve me.

Early colonial history with the relationship between the natives before the Manifest Destiny stuff, history of disenfranchised groups like rednecks/"white trash", history of each respective accent and it's origin, the war of independence + the civil war and (no bully) civil rights and 60s stuff is very unique.

Attached: 1551365318265.jpg (229x220, 6K)

I'm glad you learned something new today. :^)

Stupidest thing I've read all day
You said that most advancements came after the Renaissance in an attempt to belittle the contributions of Europe, I posted 3 examples of European cultural, military and religious domination that happened successively before the Renaissance and from which the entire world has adopted atleast parts of their culture or creations. The same cannot be said for the groups you listed

Your post is the stupidest thing in the history of the universe.

>in an attempt to belittle the contributions of Europe
Never said that, I said these happened within the past centuries unlike the Swede user who said 2000 years.
>The same cannot be said for the groups you listed
Well just for two of them, Ummayads pushed a religion practised by a few thousand people in a desert into becoming more then a billion large in number and the Qing nomads expanded China to it's largest breadth, which China still claims today in its control of Turkestan and Tibet.

Because we don't have a culture, we're mutts from europe and africa with some central-siberians

and we're ugly

English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, Dutch, Frisians, French, Bretons, Occitans, Basques, Catalonians, Castilians, Andalusians, Galicians, Portuguese

>Swedish death metal
I object

Anything between it’s inception and today but in particular post WW2 policymaking, how you can design a superpower, all the social developments that predate those in Europe and the rest of the world, etc

Yeah we've had a very interesting past 50-100 years. If you can look past the meming and absurd politics, most of the country is really nice. It annoys me that we can't really discuss that part of the US because we're kind of one of those meme countries that people find impossible to discuss seriously on this site without bringing up their retarded politics.

thats western europe, not west-western europe.

One could perfectly discuss US history back on Krautchan.
I'm always amazed when I learn something new. It's just weird I suppose how there can be so many fuck-ups and extreme situations yet somehow it all ends up working out. Also so many parallels to be drawn between today and the 70s.

what a retarded comment to make

who the fuck says west-western europe?

I see latin america having the same culture. because the spanish killed all of their native culture

>thats western europe, not west-western europe.
This isn't a retarded post, it's a retard's retarded post

Everyone loves us.

Attached: 1550949017263.gif (511x512, 105K)

I'm fascinated by Americans for using locks that one-and-a-half-year-olds can pick

Attached: American-security.webm (360x640, 382K)

literal who? sorry