Socialism doesn't wo-

>socialism doesn't wo-

Attached: china-gdp.png (730x340, 10K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_economic_reform
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_economic_reform#Course_of_reforms
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

China has had a capitalist economy ever since the reforms by Deng Xiaoping.

t. never read deng

Then tell us

Deng was based since he makes both the right and left seethe in rage

>The more capitalist China became the more prosperous it also became.
Really makes you think.

No, finish your sentence. Chinese markets have become increasingly liberal since 1979, the graph is merely showing the success of capitalism.

It's funny to see right wingers pull the not real communism meme they so much dread to account for China's growth.

Not sure if baiting.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_economic_reform

Deny wrote persuasively that before full socialism could be implemented China had to complete several dialectical cycles. Basically the man was an accelerationist and argued past a point of market development a complete transition to communism could then occur. He was also a vocal critic of capitalism as a system until his death.

>it's not real communism!

It used to be and then it wasn't because people were starving to death and the CCP realized communist economic policies were retarded. You should read a little bit about Chinese history.

>It's not a real argument!

And yet he was the architect of economic liberalization reforms which made China more capitalist. Really makes you think.

>millions starve to death under communion for decades
>implement state capitalism and see a sudden economic improvement
>communism works!

China is schroedinger's communism to American right wingers because they are retarded and historically illiterate idiots.

The only retarded and historically illiterate idiots are people like you who claim communism is responsible for China's post-reform prosperity. I mean, how dumb do you have to be?

>explain what a dialectic is
>ameritard throws a stale soundbyte
Now that really makes me think.

>rk

Attached: socialism.png (990x970, 1.31M)

Your name-calling doesn't change anything. Everything I said was accurate.

>China becomes Communist in 1949
>Complete stagnation of the economy for the next 30 years
>Start privatizing industry in 1979
>Sudden economic boom
>"Lol, communism works!"

The absolute state of modern communists.

-rk
china prove that nation capitalism is the master race

Kek. If some shithole in Africa or wherever with less interventionism than China does very badly, it's because the market isn't free enough and Not Real Capitalism. If China grows, it's only a merit of capitalism. Literal doublethink from these people.
Also good luck getting them to understand dialectical materialism.

Actually it wasn't doing so bad until Mao decided to do everything his way for the economy

Early on the economic policies were decided upon with the input of Deng etc.

>If China grows, it's only a merit of capitalism.
Exactly.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_economic_reform#Course_of_reforms

If it's only merit of a free market, why are shitholes in Africa with less interventionism doing so poorly?

>t. doesn't understand what dialectical materialism is

Attached: exv41gtdz0x01.png (851x714, 178K)

>as china embraced capitalist economic reforms it stopped being a commie shithole
woah

Because they're run by fucking dictators.

Bottswana is the most developed country in Africa because it has free markets, open elections, and relatively low corruption.

>Because they're run by fucking dictators.
I'm talking about economy interventionism. Also right wingers love to talk about muh totalitarian Chinese dictatorship anyway.

Its almost as if the structure of Communist nations allow for dictators to easily come into power

>Anyone who is pro-capitalism is therefore against any form of government interventionism.

Why are communists always so fucking dense?

I mean, America could arguably be called a dictatorship for most of its history, given how voting rights were a very recent thing that was achieved.

Works for me bro

Attached: DvQLLNKX0AAxz3w.jpeg.jpg (720x960, 131K)

Doesn't your country literally flog you for spitting on the sidewalk?

>capitalism is destroying the planet
You are just proving the OP point

Not sure what you're getting at. Interventionist African countries tend to be poorer.

Attached: communism_btfo.jpg (1993x2733, 665K)

the chinks are barely communist anymore

kek

>prosperity in China = good
>prosperity in Korea = bad
Kill yourself you dumb faggot.

ruh roh

Attached: Screenshot_20190224-214659_Google.jpg (1080x918, 137K)

you mean Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era doesn't work

rk

Attached: data.jpg (2047x3482, 1.04M)

It isn't, it's more akin to an unholy union of NatSoc and keynesianism. Hardline communists are the minority in the party and the rest are basically democrats.

Attached: 1542312535011.png (157x117, 2K)

China actually followed the same course as Russia/Ukraine et al in that the ruling communist oligarchy wanted Western money and investment but they didn't really want to give up their poltiical power, although they were rather more successful at it due to population size and a more favorable geographical location to participate in world trade.

>post-Mao China
>socialist

Attached: 1282176225173.jpg (195x188, 13K)

Actually they're going full out commie under Xi and he's trying to resurrect Maoism.