We made it
Other urls found in this thread:
initc3.org
initc3.org
twitter.com
damnit
I like this cube
Thanks fren heres another
Had to save this one as a jpeg so i could post it
One more
....so link is actually legit?
Of course. There is a reason why its mentioned on this board all of the time.
>he fell for the link is a meme meme
Between gooks using BMW and Apple laptops in the background of tweeter posts to claim partnerships and faggots getting "married", it's no wonder these kids don't recognize legitimate partners.
How do you know link isn't the same thing?
This news still doesn't guarantee a moon though
I CANT FUCKING TAKE THIS SHIT ANYMORE, EVERYTHING YOU GUYS SHILL THAT I BUY DUMP TO 0.
AND VERYTHING THAT YOU shiLl THAT I DONT BUY PUMPS 100X FUCKING FUCK OOOOOOF SHILLFUCKSSSSSSSSSSSS
>always do the opposite of what Jow Forums says
Always do the opposite of what biz says
>Always do the opposite of what biz says
Always do the opposite of what biz says
but biz says to buy, and also not to buy. Doing nothing is the name of the game right now
>he fell for the link is a meme meme, meme
post yfw we make it
>news
Separate donors giving to a common cause does not equal working together. Didn't help Kaddafi or Mubarak moon, didn't prevent a dirt nap.
new logo looks stupid and generic
like every other shitcoin that's out there
>IC3 Partners and Donors
ok they donated money, so what?
>a college school project endorsed chainlink
wow m8 incredible
we made it
How is this even news to you faggots? Ari Juels co-wrote the fucking whitepaper. Town crier integration was confirmed last year. Absolute newfags.
stop
they need visual confirmation. easy to digest
What is "Chain"?
Moon will happen with main net release and adoption. Shitposting here has left a negative stigma towards Chainlink in general outside of Jow Forums. Wouldn't have it any other way, plebbitors can buy my bags for $500 each.
>he fell for the link is a meme meme, meme meme
based
>IC3 is an initiative of faculty members at Cornell University, Cornell Tech, EPFL, ETH Zurich, UC Berkeley, University College London, UIUC and the Technion. It's based at the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech in NYC.
yeah, that's pretty much it. They donated money to an university project
>The National Science Foundation awarded IC3 a $3M 3-year grant in 2015. We seek partners in industry, law and commerce to sponsor and collaborate with us in our mission to deliver powerful, principled, and practical innovations.
also they're out of cash.
>Separate donors giving to a common cause does not equal working together.
t. Turbobrainlet
Ari Juels is one of the key figures at IC3, and he co-wrote the Chainlink white paper a year ago.
Also, IC3's Town Crier is a key part of the white paper.
Chainlink and IC3 have been working together as partners for a long time now.
See
Those are some proper 30yo boomer glasses, so I guess that's mfw we make it
by your retarded metric IBM, Microsoft and Cisco are now in a partership. just go fuck yourself brainlet. They're just sponsors.
Also did you know that Gazprom and Coca-Cola are now partnered?
Me:
>"a key figure at IC3 co-wrote Chainlink's white paper, and a key IC3 development is being integrated into Chainlink, that makes them partners"
You:
>"how can you say they're partners just because they share space on the same promotional webpage???"
You must have brain damage.
Is this page new or is Link’s addition to the page new?
Wow, they actually got something back for sponsoring them. Fucking mindblowing.
>Separate donors giving to a common cause does not equal working together
this is what it's about brainlet.
Link has no actual value until main net release, but then it will be too late. Price action before main network is irrelevant
>Separate donors giving to a common cause does not equal working together
No, co-writing the white paper and integrating a key part of the other party's developments equals working together.
IC3 was not one of the donors, but the recipient. Do you even know what anyone here is talking about?
>IC3 was not one of the donors, but the recipient.
You were the one implying this when you said "separate donors giving to a common cause".
You actually have brain damage, don't you?
I honestly don't know what you're even trying to say. Everyone agrees that seperate people or companies giving to a common cause does not mean partnership or working together.
I don't even know what fucking point you're argueing. Yeah chainlink funded them and received a piece of code in return. So fucking what? That's not even what the discussion is about.
Fucking pajeets please do some reading comprehension
>Everyone agrees that seperate people or companies giving to a common cause does not mean partnership or working together.
Again you're implying that IC3 was one of the donors.
>I don't even know what fucking point you're argueing.
That Chainlink isn't a donor for IC3 like you claimed, but that they have been working together since at least a year ago.
As evidenced by the fact that IC3's Ari Juels co-wrote Chainlink's white paper, and IC3's Town Crier is an integral part of Chainlink's development.
>mfw they literally changed the logo because the old one was associated with offensive memes on a literal anime imageboard
Truly the most hilarious timeline.
>no proofs
>desperate enough to make up bullshit just to sell bags at less loss
My condolences to your parents. You're clearly mentally handicapped.
Can I donate money, or do your parents prefer diapers and wipes for you?
they're just funding some university project. If you go to a page without colorful images but a bit of text you might be able to figure that out
initc3.org
>IC3's Ari Juels co-wrote Chainlink's white paper, and IC3's Town Crier is an integral part of Chainlink's development
>HURRRRRRR CHAINLINK IS JUST A SPONSOR
So they have someone on their team who also works for the university.
Never heard of a more interesting story in software. Literally unheard of.
>"""""someone"""""
Go to IC3's website, click on the "people" tab.
Look who's all the way at the very top of the list.
I'm still not sure how exactly this disproves
>Separate donors giving to a common cause does not equal working together
Can you elaborate? The recipient, IC3, is not mentioned in this sentence. Where is it wrong?
You're implying that Chainlink and IC3 are both donors to IC3.
And you're implying that I implied that THIS makes them partners.
You're an idiot.
>You're implying that Chainlink and IC3 are both donors to IC3.
fucking hell, where? You cannot be this retarded. You just can't be.
Are you doing this on purpose to smear LINK investors? To label them as the biggest retards on biz? Is that your goal?
Is this clever FUD?
>fucking hell, where?
Here: and here: and here: You keep saying and implying that Chainlink and IC3 are "separate donors", and "just sponsors".
And then you say the opposite here: You seriously have mental issues.
retard please.
Separate donors (THE DONORS) giving to a common cause (IC3) does not equal working together (AMONG THE DONORS)
Annotated the statement for your small brain needs. Next time just ask an adult to read the sentence for you
>clever
>Jow Forums
Pick one.
Me:
>IC3 and Chainlink are indeed partners
You:
>NO, CHAINLINK AND THE SPONSORS OF IC3 ARE NOT PARTNERS
Brain damage.
I'm sure not why this is triggering every autist here. There are two ways to read it. Either those are all partners and donors with no particular way to differentiate them or VMware and potentially the national science foundation are the donors and the rest are partners.
How is this difficult?
I stated on several distinct occasions that chainlink received a reward for sponsoring them. Apparently they have a team member on the literal research crew.
That's called a partnership. Sorry, I didn't know that I had to make that explicit for you to acknowledge it.
>chainlink received a reward for sponsoring them
Yes that's totally what happened.
Top delusion.
that's literally how universities and companies work
At this point you just have to justify argueing a lost point for so long.
Sure user. Have a great day!
Thanks you too. Hope for you LINK doesn't dump too much
Absolute cope
I hope it does, because it might make you feel better about yourself and that's all that matters to me.
This has confirmed two major things:
1) Microsoft bletchy is using chainlink
2) Chainlink has been designed to function as distributed writers for hyperledger
On point two, if you read one of sergeys earlier medium posts the same terminology is used as the hyperledger whitepaper. Chainlink will be an industry standard.
>Browsing an anime forum for 7 years made you into a millionaire in the end
JUST AS ACCORDING TO KEIKAKU
>
This makes sense, knowing that Sergey and Ari published their white paper, which is essentially a patent on the whole idea of the decentralized oracle. They could sue any competition for infringement
KIA Motors and Budweiser are in a partnership to get people drunk driving, so they sell more beer and cars
Mainnet when?
I've been here since 2004 and still not a millionaire...if I make it with this, porn and anime validated my whole life choices.
>jackoff and watch anime all day
>become a millionaire by throwing 50 bucks at a random coin
>continue jacking off and watching anime
How is point one confirmed?
1) sergey has said on video that they're working on cryptlets with microsoft
2) the cryptlet schema is an exact json schema fit to the chainlink adaptor json
3) sergey owns the cryptlets.in domain, which was created on the exact same date as the cryptlets.com domain
You're a fucking retard wow
Heres a screenshot to back up your claims user. Were gonna make it fren.
thanks, fren.
there's a good r*dd*t post that jonny huxtable made explaining all of this. last time i linked it i got banned for like two weeks so if anyone's interested just google it.
What subreddit is it on? I dont really go on that site cause theres no frogs
r/linktrader
>r/linktrader
I tried looking around but the lack of frogs discouraged me from staying on that stale humorless site
Should I dump my remaining req for more link?
>Holding anything but link
Only if youre a fucking big dick chad and have dyor and know link is going to make you rich.
You people disgust me
You should have done that months ago when it became clear req wouldnt do anything until after link mainnet
The FUD has become straight nonsense
comparing this doesn't work because it's sponsors for a sports event.
IC3 is working on implementing smart contract technology to business and finance.
i bet you are a fun guy to be around.
This thread was the best
Got some new cubes out of it.
I literally told all my good friends, to buy. They didnt even have to go all in.
Just 200$ would be enough. But they kept ignoring me. My family members did the same.
But of course they will want to leech of you, once you have made it.
Everyone already knew Chainlink was an official partner of IC3. Thomas has said so multiple times. This picture just makes it look better.
Why Microsoft didn't already buy all Link tokens to host nodes on Azure?
>$200
Topfuckingkek you need 100k to "make it" and 10k to stop the suffering
Sergey likely wouldn't allow that. If he's going to have a truly decentralized network ubiquitous across many different industries he'd have to save big bags for other huge companies.
Because sergey has 650 million to give out for free lmfao idiots.
>sergey won't allow it
>decentralized network
Fucking lol you linkies have the iq of a paper clip
Will this bag ever hit 9k satoshi again
nice FUD
Holy fuck this is huge. The project page is full of feasible non-pajeet articles that talk about actual use cases and implementations instead of promising the world. There’s a page for papers and pre-prints. There’s job listings for phds and postdocs. And the chainlink logo is top and center and when you click it it goes to smartcontract.com
Also you left out microsoft and Siemens from the screenshot.