How is it allowed?

How is it fair? This is legit Bullying. Do you honestly feel pround to win a 17 vs 2 war? We did Nothing Wrong

Attached: Bullying.jpg (1645x1080, 612K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Michael's_Coup
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Margarethe
history.com/this-day-in-history/finland-declares-war-on-germany
learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/oct-13-1943-italy-switches-sides-in-world-war-ii/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_coup_d'état
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Suck Wellingtons dick.

literally who?

Napoleonic wars were decided in Russia and the aftermath was just bystanders kicking a lying man.

Attached: Sir_Arthur_Wellesley,_1st_Duke_of_Wellington.png (800x1093, 1.47M)

>Wellington
What has New Zealand to do with this?

it's all your fault anyway

why didnt napoleon come to the balkans to liberate us from turks?

looks like a typical english faggot

Nothin' personnel Frence

How so?
>Be France
>Transition from Monarchy
>UHHH NO LE BAGUETTE IS KILLING MONARCHY, MUH NOBILITY PRIVILEGES ARE THREATENED LET'S INVADE HIM
>Defend ourselves successfully for 5 wars
>6 to 7 Coalitions later
>It was all France fault

WTF

Is this bullying too ?

Attached: 1944.jpg (1200x920, 833K)

The typical english faggot destroyed the French Empire?

ayo look liks this corsican finna boutta get DABBED on

You literally started that one.

never doubted that

Dude, you had Czechoslovakia, Italian Social Republic, Finland, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria to help you.

Only Naples supported us.

>blitzkrieg everyone around you
>why u bully fuck you commie human waves fuck you ethernal anglo

germs, everyone

you had all of europe when you invaded russia
so did we
but they turned against you, just like it happened to us

The relationship between Britain and France is Angry Sex tier.

I never comnplained about it, maybe you have problems with your reading comprehension

ISR was a german puppet state + finland was useless

finland also turned against us

>but they turned against you, just like it happened to us
No they didn't turn against you, most of the country fought with you till the end, or some got their regime overthrown then did Nothing. We literally got Backstabbed then the second we stepped a foot back in the Rheinbund, trying to fing another plan Suddenly ALL of Europe jumped on us.

a bloo bloo

>most of the country fought with you till the end
romania
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Michael's_Coup
hungary
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Margarethe
finland
history.com/this-day-in-history/finland-declares-war-on-germany
italy
learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/oct-13-1943-italy-switches-sides-in-world-war-ii/
yugoslavia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_coup_d'état

never forget

Attached: IMG_20190228_150820.jpg (2160x3840, 3.09M)

>Be France
>Transition from monarchy to a terror dictatorship
>Tens of thousands are killed
>Other European countries protest and form a coalition
>France declares war on them and annexes huge chunks of territory
>France deletes noble states dating back hundreds of years to install puppet regimes and gain more cannon fodder
>France tries to invade Britain
>France genocides freedom fighters in Spain
>Overpowered states ask for peace but France declares war again and again till they're completely gone
>France starts losing in Russia, sending more than a hundred thousand German conscripted soldiers to their deaths
>BOO HOO WHY DOES NOBODY LIKE ME

That's what i said
>or some got their regime overthrown then did Nothing
All the Nazis supporters got their gvt overthrown because of the soviet offensive. Fo you honestly think those would have switch sides by their own if their territories weren't invaded, they would have back you up, they were just scared of the "Aftermath" so they act like they were Resistance movements. Only the Benelux, France, Poland and some parts of Yougoslavia were legit occupied country who didn't accept fully the occupation and have full resistance movement from day one of their respective occupations.
Your original allies didn't care at the beginning then just "didn't want to associate with you" once they saw shit started to get worse and got scare of the after WWII.

Finland, well was just being Finland.

Based.

Should have had a similar war to kill all Anglos and the world would be a better place

Angry GAY sex, where the up and bottom are frequently reversed

Attached: IMG_20181223_112004.jpg (4608x3456, 2.82M)

lol you have absolutely no proofs about those points:

>Other European countries protest and form a coalition
>France tries to invade Britain
>France genocides freedom fighters in Spain
>Overpowered states ask for peace but France declares war again and again till they're completely gone

Revisionnism 101. We were the victims from start lmao

We built Europe and we built the FRENCH EMPIRE. In return you destroyed our empires and now you ask us to get over it. My ancestors literally bled for you to civilize your shitholes. and now you alienate their descendants.

Why is it that the French man is expected to "just get over it" when his empires were destroyed and stripped of their wealth to build Anglos' fucking empires. Why is it that the FRENCH MAN is expected to just get over COALITION WARS and institutional Francophobia and getting fucking killed in Leipzig. How about YOU NON-FRENCH FUCKING GET OVER IT WHEN A FRENCH MAN BREEDS YOUR WOMEN. YOU FUCKING GET OVER YOURSELVES NON-FRENCH.

The greatest thing the Anglo devils fear is a French man remembering who he is and what he built like Brussels. When a French man knows who he is he can topple the Germanic system and breed every white bitch in sight inseminating their nubile wombs with frenh seed until the Germanic demon genes are obliterated from existence. We won't let you forget a god damn thing you done to us but no one's gonna remember your pale Germanic evil racist asses when we've bred you out of existence.

>We literally got Backstabbed
Many of those countries were only in alliances with you because you forced them to be. It doesn’t take much to sense to realise why they turned on you as soon as they could

>Transition from monarchy to a terror dictatorship
Except the Reign of Terror happened as a direct consequence of the threats of the Duke of Brunswick and the formation of the First Coalition. Unsurprisingly it ended as soon as the Battle of Fleurus was won and the threat of a Prussian invasion resolved for the foreseeable future. You're switching around cause and effect. It was not a humanitarian intervention to end le evil dictatorship, it was rather the Republic resorting to desperate means to keep together a country beset from all sides, both external and internal.

Then again, I shouldn't be surprised that a German doesn't understand the price of freedom. You've never fought for your rights, you've had they jammed down your throats time and again (and each time you've slid back towards your natural tendency for tyranny).

>France starts losing in Russia, sending more than a hundred thousand German conscripted soldiers to their deaths
Only a hundred thousand? Should've been more. Then there wouldn't have been anyone left to betray Napoleon at Leipzig, or destroy Europe a century later.

Just read some wikipedia. France declared the first war on 20 April 1792, thus France is the original aggressor

those countries also changed sides due to the russian advance and then fought against you after you forced them into a alliance after beating them

>Could you please not kill Louis
>t. Freddy and Leo
>hon hon hon hon
>This means war!!!!!

>Many of those countries were only in alliances with you because you forced them to be
Yeah right, because i totally don't see UK doing the same if you were on our shoes at that time. Those forced Alliances were the first step of suing for peace in Europe. Like every fucking Treaty's purpose. But no, All Europe was still warmongering cunts who wanted to destroy us.

Do you even know why we declared war on Austria? Don't you know every country that interferes without permission to another Sovereign country's internal affairs, to the point of threatening to sending troops and invade is a valid Cassus Belli? THAT is WHY we declared war in the first place.

>Sign declaration that states if anything happens to the king war will be declared
>The king is executed for treason
>War is declared pre-emptively
>"Oh no, how could those evil agressors move against us! It's not like we got involved in their national politics under the threat of violence!"

Why should anyone be spared rightful punishment for high treason? Or are we going to pretend the Flight to Varennes never happened and the king was just killed because everyone was angry? You know that if he didn't actively cooperate with foreign elements to stage an invasion, it would've just resulted in the constitution of 1793 without any difficulties, right?

Hell, even Kant condemned this shit and thought the French Revolution should remain the affair of the French alone.

>hurr durr Hitler only killed Jews because he couldn't deport them to Madagascar due to British navy
It doesn't matter what the precise sequence of events is. The French was a regime that was willing to commit such atrocities, that's what makes it a terror regime. The surrounding monarchies knew that nothing good could come from the revolution and they turned out right.

>Then again, I shouldn't be surprised that a German doesn't understand the price of freedom. You've never fought for your rights
>Wat is 1517, wat is 1813, wat is 1848, wat is 1918, wat is 1989

>Giving "the citizen Louis Capet" a rightful execution after he has been condemned of treason after a fair trial in which he was even given a defense lawyer is the same as a genocide based on the rumor of a conspiracy
Germans: not even once.

>Wat is 1517
Yeah, what is it?

>Wat is 1813
The betrayal of a liberal regime to restore the Ancien Régime

>Wat is 1848?
The rejection of German unification by a king who thought being limited by a constitution was "too liberal"

>Wat is 1918
One of many instances of Germany getting liberty rammed down its throat by foreign elements

>Wat is 1989
The same as 1918 and 1945

Yeah right, because i totally don't see UK doing the same if you were on our shoes at that time.
I don’t disagree but I don’t see why you’d think those strong-armed countries would like France afterwards and wouldn’t switch sides ASAP

>Crazy leftists tell how you want to kill you
>Mass riots and looting
>want to preserve your personal and your family's safety
>try to move to a safer place
>"oy vey he wants to bring down France"
>write some letters to your family members
>"hon hon this is treason! He can't send letters to his in-laws! Freedom of speech isn't okay for kings!!! He is a traitor!!!"

Because you have to be a Fucking Honorless cunt to violate Peace Talk and treaties. Especially when we already made not one but a BUNCH with Austria and Prussia after several war prior to the Russia Campaign but no, they were STILL asking for war again. This is legit Autism and being Stubborn and Entitled.

Then why the fuck would you sign Peace Talks if you Don't want to Sue for Peace and backstab on the first occasion you have?

>Crazy leftists tell how you want to kill you
Nope

>Mass riots and looting
Prior to this? Nah. That's later stages.

>want to preserve your personal and your family's safety
Which could've been easily done by simply obeying with the constitution, not insisting on attending sermons by non-juring priests, not veto-ing any attempt to create a military force in response to the Duke of Brunswick's threats and not vetoing any attempt to reform the oudated economic system.

>try to move to a safer place
Abroad? In a country that has already proven hostile to the existing regime?

>write some letters to your family members
Yeah, "some letters to family members" that were bad enough to lead to a near-unanimous vote for treason in the national assembly. "Some letters to family members" that also involved the king's ministers. Of course. "Some letters to family members" that also happened to prioritize his father in law who by sheer coincidence happened to be the same Holy Roman Emperor who had already vocally expressed distaste for the new regime.

You can twist the revolution as you will, you'd have to be retarded (or worse, a royalist) to believe Louis did anything but incompetently bumble from one scandal into another. For fucks sake, you can at least stop twisting facts and simply use the Divine Right line of reasoning that makes it impossible for a king to be a traitor even if he invites a foreign invasion.