“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.“
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.“
(eng.) kill yourself
>No you can't say mean things about that group of people! They had a bad thing happen to them 80 years ago!
"Dang, I thought this country was supposed to have free speech."
>“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.“
How is this a nu-male meme?
>what do you mean my jingoistic genocidal totalitarian ideology should be banned? And you're supposed to be the tolerant ones!? Yeah, right...
>I can't say "nigger" on twitter? THAT'S LITERALLY CENSORSHIP!
>The US military needs to get out of other countries! Close the overseas bases!
>i will tolerate objective evil and shittiness because my fee-fees compel me to
Yeah you will probably need a license soon to say anything at this point
Does it bad?
>Centrists are cowardly scum! And the horseshoe theory is false!
>we rove you america, prease nuke us again and we'll suck up to you even more
>"Israel can't bulldoze the houses of arab terrorists. that's mean!!!"
damn...
woah...
Holly fuck you have no capability of comprehension nor every read philosophy, right?
The claim says that its defends the liberty of the one to speak, but it doesn't hold what is said as true nor defend it neither say that you don't the right to reply or have to agrre with wath is being said. De only thing being defended is the right to speak freely, you can defend it and against the speech of someone, give contrary argumentation etc
>defends communists and fascists right to freez peach
>one of them gains support and take away your right to free speech
Nothing personal
In order for it to be true you have to believe that liberalism is right, I don't believe in free speech because I'm not a liberal
The possible rise of an authoritarian government is another authoritarian Police State, that would prohibited any type of association and etc, China, Belarusian and very other "republics" formed from the previous USSR.
As I said, letting they speak do not blocks you from doing the same, i would say that is better to know who has Nazis tendencies than let a Trojan Horse getting on power places and screwing things over.
I do agree that in practical applications it has flaws, cause that you require a critic, well informed and mature society (That we do not have in any places of the world), but is the best we have for now, even the very on democracy is very flawed in practical there, cause of example Venezuela got to the state it is now by democratically, and than from the position of power the changes were made by the book to perpetuate a person in power in a "democratic way".
kek imagine replying like this to an obvious shitpost
>objective evil
no such thing, you cuck
>I'm not a liberal