Was the British Empire a force for good or evil?

what about egypt, sudan, lesotho, benin, botswana, kenya, somalia, ghana, cameroon, gambia, nigeria, zambia, malawi, south africa, namibia, zimbabwe, swaziland, tanzania, uganda

Kenya is a nice place, and the people friendly

most of those are actually not to bad compared to surrounding countries with the exception of somalia

kenya is remarkably safe for an african country, much more so than any french one
belize has a lot of british retirees, it must be pretty safe
youre being an obtuse spastic and i shan't be entertaining it
i admitted not every colony is going well but, on the whole, they're still going better than any of their portuguese, spanish or french neighbours
name 5 colonies from the other european powers where you would feel safe to live in for a year. not in some expat conclave, right next to the locals

All better thanex African French colonies hmmm
Also somalia was more Italian that British

>conclave
enclave

It was good but if it had colonized lithuania it would have been better

Yes kenya is great
Until you get beheaded by shababs.
And Belize is an utter shithole, delusional aussie retard

British Empire still exists until the 29th

Better than any frog colony in Africa

Hong Kong and Singapore are fine. You're right about the others.

to follow to previous principal. Places were the native no longer exist are good places.

Like, quebec, the souhtern cone.
Actually Greenland is a good place, even with natives, just showes brits wern't the best at civilising, the danes were.

What about Malaysia?

>name 5 colonies from the other european powers where you would feel safe to live in for a year. not in some expat conclave, right next to the locals
Tunisia
Uruguay
Guadeloupe
Costa Rica
Macao

t. kenyan

Shouldn’t surprise me, no british flag is actually british

seething frenchoid
>b-belize is a shithole
a statement alone isn't an argument. it has a tourism sector, it has a pretty large british expat community. parts may be shit but it wouldn't have anything if it was a total shithole through and through. you don't hear about moors retiring to guatemala or honduras do you

>it has a pretty large british expat community

it's actually worst than I thought

didn't read the rest

>Hong Kong and Singapore
>Both likewise built up from nothing
Maybe the problem wasn't the people, but the existent cultures?

bit funny that the only major french colony worth anything has been ruled by anglos for longer than france had it

Ah yes the famous ad hominem, you have to resort to name calling, when in fact Kenya isn't a bad place for Africa, there are more Africans in France than in the UK so think before you type

3 of the past 4 prime ministers in canada have been french

and how about you go back to your country
you have no arguments

Québec is successful despite anglo pigs, not thanks to them

I am in my country, and i have no argument? You don't you are just resulting to insults, that is the mark of a mong. I am waiting for you to prove me wrong about better sub Saharan African ex frog colony

this pro-british australian seems to be forgetting one thing

modern day britain is a product of france

Attached: 1531055428474.png (300x384, 172K)

Colonial empires are pure self-interest. Saying they built infrastructure doesn't matter because it was used to facilitate the extraction of wealth.

One thing I like about it is that you never forced xtianity. Despite being under pressure from the missionary lobby

@102682786
>I am in my country

no you're not

don't @ me cringelord

Muslim shithole

/thread

doesn't change the fact that the only way they were able to achieve such prominence was by taking advantage of the system established by anglos

GOTT STRAFE ENGLAND

Its very rich

This.

I am more white than you will ever be m'boko, you have no argument or points

Attached: 1552306971997.gif (280x280, 2.89M)

what he said

If it weren’t for mass murder and downright villainy, the empire could have stayed even longer. The majority of India(Pakistan inlcuded) never wanted to cut ties ENTIRELY with Great Britain, but Gandhi and co had to fuck everything up.

All the Raj has to do was appoint more Scottish viceroys towards the end, things would have been handled a lot smarter. Instead they put everything in the hands of Lord Mountbatten, a literal cuckold who had his wife seduced by Nehru. Imagine being such a cuckold that after so many years, your great granddaughter releases all the love letters your wife wrote to her Indian lover.

which is redundant in a place like Africa where there would be no infrastructure naturally because they're all dumb apes

>french empire

based post

What were the outcomes of the British empire for India?

They did some messed up shit,in the long run tho it ended up benefiting the locals and natives. They were also really smart when it come to colonization since they actively replaced the local populations with their own European British people(Australia, Canada etc) instead of what we did of trying to create some diverse collaboration with natives, completely fucked us over In Africa and India where we were crushed by the weight of their population.

Learn from the brits how to colonize land properly

Lord Mountbatten got killed by the IRA

tiocfaidh ar la

>>french empire
was the most redpilled empire to come out of europe post-rome

How so?

Attached: mega anglo.jpg (800x400, 31K)

Grant independence BUT govern India the same way they did with Australia. Which would have turned out mighty well.

Modern educational reforms, law reforms, postal reforms, societal reforms, railway reforms all were founded by Lord Dalhousie in the late 1800s and were practised pre-independence BUT only to the elite classes like Brahmins or landlords simply because they needed them to act as intermediaries and give them an illusion of being “equal” to the Brits. A jury in colonial India always had at least two Indian barristers, even the judge had the chance of being Indian. Gandhi and Nehru were highly educated abroad so the British gave their words priority over the peasants.

All of this went to literal shit once the British fell completely for Gandhi’s tricks and in the end, the only outcome was washing their hands off a country that was on literal fire before the split. All because they fell for Mohandas “lol don’t hit me guys I’m non violent but you can hit my friends though” Gandhi’s lies.

It wasn't good or evil. It was good ( and bad ) that you brought civilization to so many savages, but you also meddled in the affairs of Europeans and fucked a lot of things up. You made a mess of Scandinavia by financing our enemies when you could have just let nature take its course, that would have saved a lot of lifes.

based.

they weren't ruled by jewish bankers for one

Belize has one of the highest murder rate in the world tho

Who is that politician who is white and his last name is gandhi. He's a politician in india.

Nazi Germany with good PR

How does the average indian feel about the UK?

European colonialism as a whole gave random ooga-booga people all over the world access to science, education, medicine, hospitals, universities, public infrastructure, christianity, agruculture, etc. This cancels out any bad it may have done imo

Can't wait until Putin blocks all you Russians from the internet.

>parts may be shit but it wouldn't have anything if it was a total shithole through and through
what is it with runts and an inability to understand basic sentences
how many tourists visit the congo i wonder

Attached: images (3).jpg (259x194, 4K)

Fuck the brits. Every young anglo girl raped by a rapefugee is a debt paid for her ancestors.

you ready for the simultaneous brexit rape and mixed race royal baby?

Attached: ca4031dc907908d483e8c88c72b35ca6-prince-charles-rothschild.jpg (735x991, 105K)

nice damage control bruce
isn't it getting too hot in your trailer?

not going in for this piss poor bait now, you've shown your hand

>tf
>tp
ngl you probably are a rapefugee

Gandhi is a surname. If you mean Rahul Gandhi, he’s not a direct descendant of “The” Gandhi. He’s a descendant of Nehru. He’s half Italian.

The average Indian includes nearly a billion people m8. Resentment, gib reparations, muh Kohinoor etc etc all of that aside, I really doubt there are any Indians who hate le Britishers or would kill any British tourists on sight. Colonial history aside, Indians usually root for England in the ashes and root for them in football so there’s really no hate(not counting the genocide). I even have relatives living in the UK.

Attached: D0CCEF5A-65B2-43D0-86E7-B5501272ABA8.jpg (650x447, 30K)

g o h o m e c h i n k

Attached: 1518645752177.png (2000x1200, 3.6M)

Nigeria is the best African country

can't imagine being part of a billion people on the planet, hell a few million is a lot

truly staggering numbers, what do you feel when you see these puny states (in comparison) with massive landmasses like Canada / Australia ?

I don’t get you. Size of Indian states compared to Australia or Canada? They’re not that massive desu

The distance from London to Moscow is still shorter than the distance from Kashmir to Kanyakumari. The map doesn’t do justice.

they brought good architecture here. but also invade us later. idk some in between

Attached: 1549741729541.jpg (512x422, 78K)

I meant like population wise, just 2 - 3 of your most populous cities can engulf entire nations like Canada / Australia.

What's it like to be part of nation that large (population wise)?

Morality is relative.

Good and evil are subjective concepts. They killed millions, but at the same time made a great contribution to the development of mankind. To say unequivocally that they were evil or good = to be an idiot.

>What's it like to be part of nation that large (population wise)?
You should ask this on Quora t b h
To answer your question, I have no idea. I’ve travelled about maybe 2% of India, only to Hyderabad, Karnataka and Goa.

fpbp

it's objective if i kill everybody else that doesn't agree with me

Good
End of discussion