If you are not all in on XLM, you are really fucking up.
Benefits of Stellar:
- ICOs - Smart-contracts - IBM running the world-wide network nodes and shilling Stellar - Stellar consensus protocol: 1000s tx / second (global scale) - Inflation distributed weekly to those who own XLM (lumenaut.net/)
- Lightning Network "State" Channels, 01 AUG - Lightning Network mainnet, 01 OCT - Lightning Network LIVE, 01 DEC
SDEX Capability:
- Stellar enables arbitrary extensions of the “tether” idea, meaning you can digitize any off-chain asset—pork futures or Zcash or SkyMiles or USD or whatever—and the protocol itself will handle redemption and compliance. Stellar therefore unifies disjoint economies (and blockchains) into a single market.
Why XLM actually has value/utility:
- XLM is Asset-to-Asset Bridge for exchanging anything-for-anything on the SDEX
The list below will be fully operational by year end, ask yourself the price of XLM by then:
>FairX >Central banks onboard >Other assets trading on stellar >FX across Asia >Pure Stellar ICOs >ICOs bailing on ETH for Stellar >New SDEX >Lightning near roll-out >Keybase projects (stellar.org/blog/keybase-and-stellar-partnership/)
Why are you still buying shitcoins (that are securities) with no growth again, nigger?
the main point of FairX is to implement trading pairs that'll attempt to decouple coins from BTC, ETH, etc., as well as to allow fiat-to-crypto trades on altcoins. they're taking their time because they want it to work flawlessly before coming out and trying to be one of the first to do it. nothing worse than shitting out something that's supposed to be all grand and it's a steaming dog turd
>for the record I hold millions of XLM and am very deep rooted into the community - i highly doubt anybody in this thread is as deep into xlm as i am congratulations? you must be new here
>implying a graphic talking about workplace diversity isn't going to be diverse >implying these aren't the people implementing XLM into real world applications while you all sit around accumulating coins on an exchange >implying that you're new enough to not realize that this is my job, and my offer letter
Angel White
>no mention of paid market makers >no mention of market maker incentives on both upcoming sdex but from lightyear themselves >no mention of StellarX rewards >no mention of NASDAQ >no expanding on what Chain actually means for Stellar
this is some subpar shilling - the price will probably dump into the 3100 range on the short term the next red day
"whales will eat it up" OK
Jack Allen
>i understand this is your job >i also understand that diversity is code for white genocide and that diversity harms productivity >implying i want poc females and trannies working on anything
Aaron Barnes
that IBM letter has been floating around for ages
Thomas Morris
I can only cover so much in the pasta user, its literally at max length.
>there is no NASDAQ relationship with Stellar. are you confused over nasdaq.com news reports mentioning stelllar? its not equivocal >chain is still unconfirmed, but, its covered in the pasta
Blake Foster
this is how i know you aren't in the know
Austin Lopez
then it's ironic for you of all people to start the XLM general thread if you feel this way
for ages? you mean since december when I first posted it, numbnuts?
Landon Jackson
if you are connecting chain, who has some relationship with nasdaq, to stellar, then you are making unconfirmed leaps
>then it's ironic for you of all people to start the XLM general thread if you feel this way >implying this isnt commonly felt by most people who do not subscribe to globohomo gayplex. you do know where you are, right?
> Hold stellar since mid last year > Notice all of the good news/partnerships/development on the network > Watch the 2018 crash chill af knowing that I'm hodling one of the few non-shit alts
Julian Gonzalez
Dumped mine a while ago, these lawsuits are a big chilling effect
> Can't handle trusted nodes concept > Can't handle a non-profit foundation with defined distribution and under federal regulation holding coins to drive adoption > Can't handle open source code base where nodes trusting one another just have to agree on what version they have adopted
True decentralization is going to have transaction speed issues, true centralization doesn't make sense in this space. Finding the right balance is where people will create good products which will be adopted.
Basically what i'm trying to say is - stay poor faggot
Nathan Myers
ripple looks more decentralized to me
Robert Reed
What coins are you buying then?
Evan Parker
Use link to get free airdrop: wysker.com/s/23
Camden Long
then you are really a low-iq fucktard - do a tiny bit of research
Austin Foster
Unfortunately the Stellar Dolphin thing is a coordinated FUD to drop the price. Sell before the news and rebuy about 4 hours later
obvious kike shill bait, but let me blow you out real quick.
stellar is the literal maximization of decentralized. the SDEX lets you trade, literally, without using a fucking exchange. you trade from your fucking wallet
Landon Gomez
Main differences are that ripple has to validate/approve nodes, and they are a for profit without true defined accountable distribution plan for xrp they control - leading to lawsuits around it being a 'security' aka selling a stake via xrp.
Stellar, node trust is dictated by nodes at hand and network consensus - thus not require SDF to validate it/control what lands in the network. Also SDF is a non-profit with a well defined ACCOUNTABLE distribution plan to drive adoption. This plan's accountability is driven via regulatory agencies and it's non-profit status. Proof of these claims can be seen with the new york department of financial services approved trading deciding that it wasn't a security.
So key difference is ripple has central governence/a way to drive final control of nodes - and while they both have a decent bit of the currency not yet distributed, stellar is far more accountable to follow their distribution plan around driving adoption and not selling stakes.
Leo Gray
this is the only correct answer. there is a reason that africa is a total shit hole, and it is called >low IQ you can't import western civilization into africa, it DOES NOT WORK. look at the fucking distaster that is south africa since blacks have taken over, it is fucking tanking hard and is one of the shittiest places on the planet to live. >be a san francisco SJW >create a SJW coin called XLM >imagine that you will transform the lowest IQ population on earth with airdropped XLM or, look at what happens in South Africa when blacks were given the option of reclaiming land that they could make a preposterous claim to or take the cash... hint, they take the cash and buy a mercedes, then they are back to being poor and back on welfare. FUCKING KEK - XLM airdrop to XLM market sell pathway ... ENGAGE.
Elijah Ramirez
this is going to go on a xrp run over the next year
Chase Richardson
> Going to let racism stop from making cash
Get the fuck out of Jow Forums and go back to Jow Forums poorfag
Liam Martinez
>ripple has to validate/approve nodes but other domains can approve nodes too xrpcharts.ripple.com/#/validators at the right of your screen in the domains* column you can see that many validators have been approved by non ripple domains >node trust is dictated by nodes at hand ripple trusted nodes list (unl) is referential, you can trust other nodes or trust those that are in the unl
Colton Foster
and many non "approved" validators are participating in the network with more than 99.9% agreement, further proving that validators dont need to be aproved by ripple to participate in the network
Bentley Rodriguez
they have pulled away from this concept, but it is otherwise sad that more people not woke on race and iq
Remember, the only reason anyone would ever FUD any coin is if there's a way for them to profit.
Aiden Butler
Based
Nice try. We're not as stupid though.
"50% for distribution via the Direct Sign-up Program 25% for distribution via the Partnership Program 20% for distribution via the Bitcoin Program 5% held by SDF to support operational costs"
once xlm reaches final form in q4 2018 there will be no use case for any of the following: - market coins - value transfer coins - muh speedy transfer coins
basically buy xlm and something in the privacy niche, maybe some components of advanced smart contract architecture and youre guaranteed to make it.
comfy af
Jason Miller
this has been superseded by:
Liam Martinez
>- market coins >- value transfer coins >- muh speedy transfer coins
What are market and value transfer coins?
Joshua Gutierrez
market: binance coin, bibox coin, aura etc. value transfer: "muh digital gold/silver" btc, ltc, bch
Easton Morgan
Got link and JNT. Waiting btc to hit $2k before I put in the rest of my fiat.
I just don't understand how xlm can be successful when it's centralized, and it seems like, even if it's successful, I'm only looking at a 10-20x, instead of potential to "make it" with a 100x like from link and JNT.
Is xlm for people who want a balanced portfolio with a decent shot at a 10x?
I was considering dumping my fiat into something with lower upside like a mix of eth and BTC. Maybe xlm should be included there. Stuff that won't make me retire with the $25k fiat I've got, but will be nice to have if link and JNT fail and I have to continue 401kucking.
John Campbell
>got link and jnt just kys now, why wait
Austin Torres
>2016 >Buy the top 10 coins on poloniex >Put $100 in this thing called XLM along with all of the other coins traded with USD >Now worth like $8k
Did poloniex know ?
James Rogers
Whoahhh, that's crazy, that you think xlm can be a store of value.
BTC has first mover advantage and a credible shot at maintaining that advantage. I suspect there will be one value token to replace money / gold and that it will be the one that can be the hardest money, with the least inflation. As xlm inflates, even if holders get the inflation, I wonder if it can take that mantle long-term.
Still, I guess a small xlm bag to hedge a."store of value" bet might make sense.
Seems like JNT is completely insane, "can this team build this product?", Link is "will decentralized oracles be huge?", and a mix of BTC/ETH/(maybe bch, xlm?) might be a worth file way to bet that one crypto will be a store of value, but I worry that hedging by buying too many different coins for this bet dilutes the effect of making such a bet.
If I could just bet that "some cryptocurrency will be a store of value" without picking a specific coin and still get paid off 10-100x, that would be great.
Kayden Sanders
the other user is misinformed. btc is going nowhere and will remain king. xlm can fill in the gaps for pretty much everything else though.
Julian Diaz
The Jibrel team seems one of the most genuine in the space, with some of the best connections as well.
If Jibrel releases a product with the specifications they provide, this will defiantly be game changing. Not to mention the tokenimics means anyone holding the token is guaranteed to see insane gains once people begin to tokenized financial assets.
Yeah, they seem like a legitimate team with actual connections, even though their goal seems completely crazy.
Like, they seem to have an ultimate goal of building a *decentralized, central bank*. What the fuck is that? How does that work for anything, since it can't print money, which seems like the main function of a central bank?
It's just completely bonkers. It's like, 90% chance they fail, 10% they make me a multi-millionaire.
I just want to take as many mostly-independent 10% bets like this as I can.
I figure if I can make three such bets, I will have decent chance of escaping wagecuckery.
.9 * .9 * .9 = about 73% of failure or about 27% chance to make it
Colton Flores
>ERC-20 token dropped
The ether network cannot handle anything in real fucking life. (((Sharding))) is estimated MAYBE in 2020/2021. The only network that can work, today, and in the future, is Stellar.