Why did this thread get shit on so much? Seems like a great idea to me

There always has to be a leader. A final word for any split decisions. I think this concept goes back thousands of years. There has to be compensation for this. If there is not better compensation then nobody will fill that role (except for a power hungry numb-nuts that will self-destroy the organization).

It sounds nice but it's really just a fantasy that would never come to fruition, as many or most of the adults wouldn't want to risk their livelihoods if they don't trust the user running it with money entirely, plus organizing and operating with such a structure probably wouldn't be easy.

look at the way his trust fund is being set up at that level the difference between $100 million and $1 billion literally doesn't matter it's likely no one in the family will even think about money and the leader will be elected from within. leadership compensation won't even be in their vocabulary

>implying some people dont want power just for power's sake

>literally doesn't matter it's likely no one in the family will even think about money

Good luck with that user. People care about money. It is never enough, especially when a group gets larger.

Maybe we're reaching an era in which comrades and culture are seen as more important than money?

...

lol you got it spot on
his business tier list is interesting implys multiple leaders

No, just no user. People try with communes and disconnected communities but those always end up with the leader fucking all the women and children and drugging the men. People are fucked up user. The grass is always greener on the other side as they say.

>Implying a fraction of a fraction of a % of the human population isn't capable of banding together for the sole purpose of cooperatively sustaining themselves in order to overcome any environmental threats and hardships.
just do low-key eugenics man

>banding together for the sole purpose of cooperatively sustaining themselves in order to overcome any environmental threats and hardships
Any time there is concentrated power there is corruption. Disprove this.

fair point user, but you know what they say...

Attached: 1529604400402.jpg (1227x1037, 125K)

Shitty meme, I know, but they got pretty close...

Attached: Screenshot_20180516-203233.jpg (1280x720, 278K)

If at first you dont succeed...

Attached: 1529433603595.jpg (657x527, 38K)

Try try again.

Attached: 1526505150734.png (796x588, 92K)

Seriously though you could make it law that the leader should abstain from that degeneracy because the only thing that should be motivating a leader is near-blind love for his people.

Yes, balkanize the power. Create the corporate-state!

Small scale could work no?

it wouldn't work unless you have billions of dollars you need to eliminate desire from their lives so you can play hitler and direct them

>would only work with billions
>80 people

Attached: Screenshot_20171216-102728.png (720x1280, 226K)

>all have 2 kids

>you need to eliminate desire from their lives.

So either pray for treaty of Versailles 2.0, Eugenics... Or use genetic engineering?

>abort the kids
>invest in SENS meme
>????
>profit

not even sure what you're implying here but money is what i'm talking about all desire stems from lack of money

Honestly this desu. The jews have a good thing going for them. The #1 reason why WE cant is because we dont exist in a strong enough tribe, and it would be very difficult to build one from the ground up.

The jews got their start thousands of years ago AND they had religion to command the rank and file members.

Gangs do this on a small scale, but they successfully recruit youth that need a sense of belonging, which isnt exactly our target demographic

Frats and sororities are another example

Money is merely a trusted proxy used to facilitate trade. Once a man has the necessities to live, all other forms of value are relatively subjective.

Wanna start a tribe(s) wit me?

Attached: 1530815314741.png (502x446, 80K)

You make it sound simple:
We establish a crypto tribe.
Even the eldest of tribes will have to buy in and membership is simply determined by wallet age / transactions/ smart contracts.
>our tribe shall worship a mysterious being known as Satoshi

Attached: 1531119588108.png (337x613, 246K)

Someday capital will be replaced by the folk being held to a standard of greatness and meeting that standard. For now those of us with IQs over 115 must use it as a means to navigate this capitalistic society, until, one day, they'll sell us the rope we'll use to hang them.

Attached: 1530838368885.jpg (367x500, 26K)

Was just about to respond similarly. All financial aspects of the tribe are handled via smart contracts. Decisions handled via voting on blockchain (representative governing though ie head of individual family vs pure democracy). And on and on.

I would agree with this, however some aspects of action (ie. subversive factions, non-auditable transactions) could be the downfall of this system. Plenty of people pencil whip their numbers to look good and even more people outright ignore documentation - probably why industrialized societies are teetering right now
>t. pharmacy technician (sees a lot of pills going to people who just wanna get high)
We'd have to establish an entirely trustless culture, wherein every aspect of life is audited or justifiably punished for infraction - slaps on the wrist for selling pounds of fentanyl to junkies shouldn't occur and possibly all recreational drug use should be sanctioned as long as it can be shown such pastimes aren't a detriment to individuals. We're gonna need FAP tokens and DRUG coins to keep this sort of thing from becoming another trans-Mormon cult.