Why are new worlders like this?

>Oh the irony, when a European in New Zealand complains about invaders to our homelands. Well, New Zealand is not your homeland ... it's the homeland of the Maoris that European invaders took from them.

>I am European. My homeland is *Europe*.

>Europe for Europeans.
>New Zealand for Maoris.

youtu.be/D7mf4niAEO8

Attached: varg pepe.png (439x346, 86K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strikebreaker
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years'_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Maoris were invaders themselves.
Overall if the current invaders aka muslims can be repelled then it will be fine, and if they win it is also acceptable cause it will prove that being a muslim means being more strong.

I didn't think Varg would ever say something so intelligent.

>Maori homeland
NZ is rightful Kahui Atua clay. Too bad they were literally butchered and eaten by the maori. Fuck the maori whingers complaining about getting BTFO.

Attached: nz brainlet.png (1296x1080, 209K)

christians attacking muslims in Christ-church why am I not surprised?

Attached: varg.png (463x261, 321K)

>Maoris were invaders themselves.
No they weren’t, stop making shit up.

>New Zealand was originally settled by Polynesians from Eastern Polynesia. Genetic and archaeological evidence suggests that humans emigrated from Taiwan to Melanesia and then travelled east through to the Society Islands; after a pause of 70 to 265 years, a new wave of exploration led to the discovery and settlement of New Zealand.[4] The most current reliable evidence strongly indicates that initial settlement of New Zealand occurred 1280 – 1320 CE.[4][5] Previous dating of some Kiore (Polynesian rat) bones at 50 – 150 CE has now been shown to have been unreliable; new samples of bone (and now also of unequivocally rat-gnawed woody seed cases) match the 1280 CE date of the earliest archaeological sites and the beginning of sustained, anthropogenic deforestation.
>The descendants of these settlers became known as the Māori, forming a distinct culture of their own. The latter settlement of the tiny Chatham Islands in the east of New Zealand about 1500 CE produced the Moriori; linguistic evidence indicates that the Moriori were mainland Māori who ventured eastward.

Attached: DA8F052D-F31D-44EC-BC43-DFF32CFFBD69.jpg (1242x356, 176K)

This schizo has some good points tho.

I knew varg was going to get triggered by this

Attached: ci.png (639x585, 138K)

>the absolute state of mutt education
cool wiki copy paste brah

fat and stupid

NZs are very cucked
I once stumbled upon a NZ forum and they started claiming how their greatx8 grandfather was a Maori savage, similar to what Americans do with native Americans.

If you look further, you will see there's many people like them.

But the world belong to Evropa

Attached: 1545617258427.jpg (1400x946, 231K)

Entire world is rightful European clay
Europeans make the best countries anyway

even on this very board you find ""people"" willing to suck maori dick for free because unlike abos they discovered fire or what not

Attached: unnamed (1).jpg (700x463, 47K)

The whole world is quite literally just EVROPA & it's colonies.

Attached: iu[1].png (1271x845, 261K)

Strong words from the great man
)))Varg((( is right again

Attached: 1513991311673.png (534x586, 487K)

I don't understand this leftist argument. It's on hbomberguy as well, the one video about Lauren Southern.

They say "if you argue that countries have native populations and that white people are declining, that means whites should leave North America, South America, and Oceania because they're invaders."

But that's just acknowledging that might makes right. So if we are responsible stewards of history, should we not look back at what's happened in the past, and avoid making an awful future for ourselves? This necessarily acknowledges avoiding immigration from foreign cultures, especially Middle Eastern and African, which do not mesh well with European or American culture.

This sort of criticism only bolsters alt-righters.

Dunno why Turkey is blue. It was literally part of the Roman Empire

Maoris killed off all the cool wildlife and we're left with is some faggy bird

That still leaves quarter of the world uncolonized. China, Afghanistan, Thailand, Iran, Japan, Saudi, Korea, Turkey, Ethiopia, etc.

Fuck yurotrash

Fuck the an*lo

3/4 of the world is properly seeking revenge on them

>But that's just acknowledging that might makes right.
But then they would just say that might makes Islamic immigration into Europe right

The biggest irony I see is when people start going on about how Europeans are christian. Nigger the Christians erased our peoples religion and traditions

This

More power to muslims

Christianity is literally Evropean culture, stupid neo-pagan
The Greeks and Romans just serve as history, nothing to do with the Evropean way of life

Right, that's the pickle there. If they acknowledge might makes right, and that Muslim immigration into Europe is "natural" by force, that also means that violent European counter-action is also valid. And that's happening. New Zealand, which has virtually no Muslims, just killed 50. France, Germany, and Britain will probably see more.

It's in the best interest of Muslims to go back to their countries before they get hurt. This is the reality now.

Christianity is a sandnig religion sorry. The proper religion of Europe is

>Roman paganism
>Germanic/Norse paganism
>Slavic paganism
>Atheism

It seems like you are a coward. Our country is being taken over by hordes of Mexicans and Black, but your dumb ass is obsessed with another country?

Europeans have been in north america longer than maori in new zealand

yikes

There are ~500 million whites in Europe and maybe 180 million in the USA, and the USA has a "new world" culture of no one being native except the handful of Indians on reservations.

Which do you think is more salvageable? Personally I am thinking of moving to Ireland instead of dealing with the mutt shitstorm that will occur in the 2050s and 2100s here. This place is not befit of my offspring.

Jokes on you I'm Muslim not pagan. I'm not talking about Greeks and Roman's. My people were druidic pagans and we're savagely persecuted by Christians in their own lands.

First, that is not a leftist argument. That is a right-wing argument that people have some kind of divine right to land. That's not how the world works and it never has. You misunderstand hbomberguy (not that this guy should be listened to either, like all Youtube politicians they live in a bubble of retarded arguments).

Might is right, and everyone understands that, even hbomberguy who obviously does not think that people should leave North America because Lauren Southern thinks you can hold territory in your mind like a goblin, he is just showing the fallacy of the argument.

he missed one

Attached: D1gVr07U0AA2ZL4.jpg (960x720, 130K)

southern doesnt even think the new world should be white

I missed him

Yes, because in order to push the idea that people have a natural right to have their own areas defined by ethnicity she is willing to make North America into some kind of free for all zone.

Problems with immigration is one thing, turning the whole world into some racialized hellhole is on another level of retarded.

>First, that is not a leftist argument
Yes it is. The Left = labor unions, and labor unions do not function unless immigration is controlled by the State. Illegal immigration acts as scabs toward working class jobs: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strikebreaker

That is because fundamentally, unions operate on the same economic principles that cartels and monopolies use. Unions only work when they can bargain for -everyone-, which is how cartels drive up prices for their goods too.

>hat is a right-wing argument that people have some kind of divine right to land. That's not how the world works and it never has

No I am afraid you are wrong. The basics of international politics, not even realist international politics, is that a country is 3 things: a government, land, and people. This is the basic definition, and the basic definition of nationalism since 1848 or so. It's not right wing or left wing, because nationalism supercedes petty political differences. Hell, socialism, fascism, and capitalism barely existed in the 1800s like that.

>You misunderstand hbomberguy (not that this guy should be listened to either, like all Youtube politicians they live in a bubble of retarded arguments).

I will admit that I haven't watched too much of him so I may not get his subtleties. From what I have seen, he is all too willing to jump to conclusions and Gish-gallop (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop go figure there's a term for Americans being retardedly disingenuous, enjoy) just like alt-righters.

>he is just showing the fallacy of the argument.

The problem is, the process of showing the fallacy just proves alt-righters right. If you say "lmao native Americans deserve all of the USA's territory because X" and X is the core of the alt-right's argument, you just proved them right.

Never noticed he had a bayonet before. one certainly would have come in handy on the end of his rifle

>"please be a total cuck, i already conceeded that it was okay to be skeptical of mass-immigration"
>"what are you doing with that ar-15?! Noo, DONT COME AT ME!!"

Attached: 1552637197380.jpg (765x801, 55K)

>native Americans deserve all of the USA's territory
they do

Hypothetically they do, but might makes right (as the entire quote chain has assumed)

Native Americans do not, and never had, the power to resist whites with guns and foreign diseases. The only hope for them was the Comanches, who were truly terrifying warriors. They depopulated the entire Mexican Cession (the territory we took from Mexico in the 1840s after the war) with their skill of horseback rifle shooting. We traded them the rifles, of course.

Most other Native Americans just scalped a few of our settlers and then got absolutely rekt. Feel how you want, it's history.

they deserve another round of smallpox

i really don't care what colonizers think.

this is indigenous land

Define "Colonization"

Does Europe belong to Syria, Iraq, and the Caucasus because those people settled Europe?

Or does North America belong to Asians who traveled across Alaska, because those Asians are colonizers?

What is the cut-off point? I'm not asking this aggressively, I'm just trying to get you to think. Is it when a group of people say "we are becoming a country" and set up a government and military? Is it when a people form a language? Is it when a people form a religion? When is it?

If you're not sure, I would recommend reading into some history of the European revolutions of 1848, when the foundations of nationalism were put to paper.

>mestizo
>indigenous

See

"okay, so let me tell you"
>smacks lips
"about how important it is to love you country
>moves to France
"and fellow country men"
>stabs Euronymous
"you must also respect other Juyropeean cultures"
>refuses to learn french
"NOW all this leads to degeneracy"
>spends his youth playing in a satanic black metal band
"You must be STRONG!"
>mouthbreaths and gains weight
"And work hard"
>Makes YouTube videos for a living
"And return to oua payGAN rhuuts"
>Cooks his meat

Attached: varg.png (129x233, 5K)

Yikes

THAT'S A NICE HEAD YOU HAVE ON YOUR SHOULDERS

Based Varg

>our peoples religion and traditions

If you don't care and don't care to discuss, don't post then retard.

Didn't he used to live in Iraq lol

Why are singapoors triggered by rejection of sandreligion?

I can understand Indonesians sure, even though most Indonesians I've met IRL are chill. But Singaporeans? You guys are supposed to be developed.

Attached: 1300166427727.gif (300x225, 332K)

Tfw no maori gf

New Zealand is no more the maori homeland. They literally immigrated there a couple of hundred years before the English. Before that, NZ was terra nullius.

>terra nullius
I'd like to deposit my dick inside of you

>Europe is no more the white homeland. They literally immigrated there a couple of hundred years before the Muslims.

>USA is no more the American homeland. They literally immigrated there a couple of hundred years before the Mexicans.

Yeah and the Indo-Europeans with their languages and gods erased the previous European's cultures. Where do you draw the line as to what is or isn't Europeans
And regardless, Europeans have been Christian for 2000 years, during the period of Europe's greatest cultural flourishing. You can't just ignore that.

Because the entire idea of Europe=Christian has been propagated in the media that to think so otherwise
Besides if Europeans want to larp as the new "Roman Empire" then they also have to realise that Rome adopted and propagated Christianity throughout its existences in which it became deeply entrenched into its society

Except his statement was true, whereas your statements are completely false

But it is the "white" homeland, because we've been here and cultivated and developed it for thousands of years, you see. I am well aware that Swedes are descended from the first civilizations in Asia as well from thousands of years ago, where the muslims now live in fact.

>>USA is no more the American homeland. They literally immigrated there a couple of hundred years before the Mexicans.
This is true however. USA is and should be open to all who can fulfill the legal criteria.

based

Attached: 1540707586126.jpg (644x800, 87K)

Sorry bros but it's been a farce.

Like baseball:

>First strike, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years'_War

>Second strike, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I

>Third strike, you're out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II

The only whites who believe in God after those 3 wars are literal shit-eating retards at this point. The only reason you might assume West=Christianity is because the USA adopted pro-religious themes to differentiate itself from the USSR during 1950-1990, but we really don't give a shit either. The only God the USA and EU worship now is currency. Judge that as positive or negative, whatever, it's what it is.

Attached: 1344909785935.gif (277x300, 1.01M)

>USA is and should be open to all who can fulfill the legal criteria.
Sadly the legal criteria is quite a low bar. Canada has far higher restrictions than us on immigration.

Yet we get called the Nazis instead of those fucks. Funny how it works huh? It's like the USA absorbs all of the West's criticism, ranging from the Libyan War to Nickelback, and all of you dicks get off scot-free. It's absolutely maddening.

God rue the day someone blames the USA for ABBA.

America is indigenous

You say that but you forget one thing and that is christianity is deeply entrenched into western society's foundation and growth.Hell your country even glorifies a group of puritan christians that sailed from Britain and Netherlands just to worship God

What the fuck am i reading

Attached: 1495576706303.jpg (865x640, 176K)

Population replacement.

the whole fabricating framing of this situation is that white people are angry because brown people exist in our countries

that's not it at all. People are scared that the rate of new immigrants from the third world coming in will be so high in contrast to our fertility stagnation that our entire cultural and national identity will be erased very quickly.

There also are no restrictions on what welfare benefits these people are entitled to, and as they bring the unemployment rates back up, they put the brakes on the entire labor rights dialogue.

Anybody who isn't a billionaire oligarch should naturally be against this. We should want to make people American, not to make America into a Latino country.

>and as they bring the unemployment rates back up, they put the brakes on the entire labor rights dialogue.
this is what identity-leftists don't realize

being left wing means left wing economics, which means supporting worker's rights. you don't support worker's rights by flooding the county with workers who don't have class consciousness.

identity-politicians need to be forced out of the left wing party like the utter retards they are