Oh wew lad. Guess it's time for another episode of "Meanwhile in reality".
>200KB is larger than the 100KB of half a year ago, and smaller than the 1MB+ a year from now.
Delusion. "200KB" was being generous. Most bcash blocks don't even get past 100KB.
>unlike BTC, where adoption is plummeting - both verifiable facts
More delusion. Here's reality:
bitinfocharts.com/comparison/size-btc-bch.html - average block size of Bitcoin VS Bcash, Bitcoin had a dip in Jan and is recovering, Bcash had a spike in Jan and fizzled out since.
outputs.today/ - number of outputs on Bitcoin has been increasing at least since April.
>WAAAAAH
>Miners signalled
Even more delusion. Miners make decisions by rejecting/extending blocks, not by "signaling". Try reading the whitepaper some time.
>Again, majority of the early adopter community, early devs, early business devs, large percentage of the community
Says you. In reality nobody gives a fuck about bcash apart from random anons online. Everyone mocks it in trading discords. Bitcoin has the most cumulative PoW by far. (fork.lol/pow/work)
>More like 6.5x less hashrate, compared to the 15x less hashrate of just a few months ago.
In reality it's 9.5 less right now. (fork.lol/pow/hashrate)
>p2p electronic cash system and not a settlement layer for banks
Vague buzzwords are not an argument Apu. In reality the whitepaper describes it as "A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution"
Bitcoin does allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another (at least as much as BCH can anyway) without going through a financial institution.
>I translated it into 2 foreign languages in 2012 you moron.
Well, it's not showing. At all. Maybe your lack of background in STEM gives you trouble grasping the concepts, who knows.
Attached: baby.jpg (500x333, 49K)