What do you guys think about immigration policy of your country?

...

Nope. I'm just not racist and I understand economics.

You're brown too.

I'm brown too?

Based

Please enlighten me on your knowledge of economics.

That's not even what I implied

t. shekelberg bootlicker trying to help the 1%

They can just come here and legally live with no problems, I think we should genocide all of then desu.

yes

>More and more people are coming in to fill a shrinking pool of jobs

>argentina
>not white

>Small island
>Limited resources
>Large population
Thinks it's a good idea to bring in net 300k plus people a year.. every year.

It's killing our country. The cities are wastelands of pakis, chinese, indians.. on and on. No one talks to anyone. Every third worlder comes here because making min wage here is 100x better than living in Bangladesh. There's been a ton of negative consequences but no one wants to have that conversation. My guess is crime rates will start to rise and young people will start to leave the country (myself included).

Ex: met a dutch man that came to Vancouver in 1960's as a sailor, stayed, worked in a lumber mill, made enough doing that to live in the trendiest neighbourhood, car, vacations, savings... today he's worth 20M he said. He has a grade 10 education from Holland....

Labor is a resource, dumb fuck. Immigration means you are importing more resources so you can produce more goods and services.

my mistake

>infinite growth is possible
>infinite density is desired
>land is infinite
So this is the power of the 85 IQ chicano. Did they behead you before you crossed the border?

Attached: columbo.jpg (337x425, 36K)

Try leaving your home, loser. Yesterday I went to a meetup consisting of whites, Asians and Latinos. We all got along fine.

More Muslims= bigger vote bank. Politicians like them , people don't

we shoulda never let that nigga pass the immigration act of 1965, it has only hurt the true Americans (whites, blacks, natives)

Attached: DOnKVr2_d.jpg (640x789, 21K)

I'm not Chicano, retard.

We have an excellent migration policy.
The country's population is declining and we plan to attract 10 million from donor countries: Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and others.

Your ancestors probably weren't considered "true Americans" either.

Post the profile of your nose with a timestamp, white man.

You are a dumb nigger. You are the blackest retard gorilla nigger I have ever seen.

based

>government putting more and more restrictions on natural resource extraction which is a massive chunk of especially my province's economy
>giving contracts to Chinese run businesses that truck in Chinese workers
>more temporary foreign workers coming in
>more people coming from elsewhere in the country and abroad
>fewer jobs in our major industries than in 2010 and the level of people coming in is still projected to increase
>labour is a resource that just produces goods and services automatically
Real life isn't a game of Civilization
I don't even know why I'm replying to a post so blatantly retarded

they were white so they were, your asian-hispanic shit is not though

>The unemployment rate in Canada stood at 5.8 percent in February 2019

Canada is at full employment, you retard.

Less white folx
More PoC

If any of your ancestors were non-Anglo, they were not considered true Americans at some period in America's history.

It's pretty good.

Most people like immigration and have no problems with it.

Only Natives and Blacks are true Americans

>Canada is at full employment, you retard.
>full employment

Attached: 1536228640365.png (437x400, 65K)

I think is awful, the majority of uruguayans are also against the kind of immigration we're currently getting.

>You're not white

Attached: white in america.png (971x690, 668K)

Generally, around 5% unemployment is considered full employment. Have you never taken an economics class?

>Full employment means that everyone who wants a job can have work hours they need on "fair wages".[1][2] Because people switch jobs, full employment means a stable rate of unemployment around 1 to 2 per cent of the total workforce

I am talking of today though. Beaners and bugmen arent true Americans now or ever

>For the United States, economist William T. Dickens found that full-employment unemployment rate varied a lot over time but equaled about 5.5 percent of the civilian labor force during the 2000s.[5] Recently, economists have emphasized the idea that full employment represents a "range" of possible unemployment rates. For example, in 1999, in the United States, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) gives an estimate of the "full-employment unemployment rate" of 4 to 6.4%.

You're literally retarded.

>I read a wikipedia article let me tell you about your country
This must be from the same psychological apparatus that motivates "muh heritage" posting

Attached: my nose.png (96x122, 23K)

I'm all for it. I'm not russian and it's mostly central asian migrants which i have more culture to share with and they similar language, caucasians like georgians, azeris, armenians which are into crime sometimes but overall like their culture and ukranians which are basically ruskies.
I live in Ufa which is already russian/tatar/bashkirs/finn ugrics so i really don't give a crap

>the words "in the United States" twice in his little copy paste
What did the mutt mean by this?

>concept with no clear definition
>you're retarded
You're retarded for taking this seriously.
You still haven't posted the profile of your nose.

>no timestamp
>hides the hook

You're retarded for declaring that the pool of jobs is shrinking when Canada's unemployment rate is around the full employment level.

Canada's full employment rate of unemployment should be comparable to the US's, retard.

You're retarded for assuming you're talking to the same poster just because we have a Canadian flag. I did not claim the pool of jobs is shrinking nor have you explained how "full employment" implies anything given how there are contradictory definitions of the concept.

Just stop posting now

Full employment is a concept established in any Econ 101 course, dumb fuck. Even in that wikipedia article, they refer to the widely used NAIRU measurement.

Attached: my nose2.png (508x477, 421K)

Islam will rule the world.
Your Governments will be take over, and we will rightfully take all women, lands and luxury goods.

You have been warned. Stop resisting - You cannot stop us.

Attached: Muzzie 08.png (1166x1171, 1.26M)

The page acknowledges there are different definitions:
>Whatever the definition of full employment

>Full employment is a concept established in any Econ 101 course, dumb fuck
I took economics and I don't remember this being taught in the first year course.

Do you even understand what it means? What is the formula and what does it imply given the current context?

Where's the timestamp genius?

I don't need one.

>I don't need one.
Said the 85 IQ spic who doesn't understand what he's posting.

none comes here

lol

>wasn't taught about full employment in economics

If Canadians are this stupid, then Canada really does need immigrants to come teach them economics.

on an individual level sure. Everyone is nice in person. I sold my spare car tires to an ex con that slashed his wife's throat, he was super polite straight up dude. I guess all murderers are awesome people.. we should welcome them all into society.

>burgerlogic.bin is corrupt or not working

Says Pedro the shovel operator who does not understand what he's typing. Post the formula for "full employment" and explain to me how it contradicts what the other Canadian poster said.

Attached: PISA 2012.jpg (589x907, 179K)

Thankfully we're a s-hole so we don't get much immigration, but there are many s-holes far worse than us and I'm always seeing more foreign blacks, and it's not like we need more of that. I think bolsonaro said something about making immigration harder and I hope he acts on it.

AHAHAHAHAHA YOU BELIEVED THAT??

>A 2014 study found that immigration reduced the crime rate in Canada: "new immigrants do not have a significant impact on property crime rates, but as they stay longer, more established immigrants actually decrease property crime rates significantly."[172]

have you ever heard of labour force participation rate? have you ever taken a stats class? Go back to your dorm room and jack off Ted.

This is from one of the most widely used macro textbooks in the world, retard. Either you lied about studying econ or your econ course was trash.

Attached: natural rate of unemployment.png (583x504, 83K)

yea and they're all multi billionaires that displace us.. hard to commit petty theft when you're bill gates' chinese cousin. I meant poor canadians will commit the crime dipshit

OK

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-03-19 02:21:36.png (1140x549, 822K)

What does the steady state of unemployment have to do with "full employment"? I bet you are a high schooler and have no clue what you're talking about.

I wouldn't be here if it weren't for the lax US immigration policy so I like it

The natural rate of unemployment is the rate of unemployment at fully employment. If you don't accept the idea of full employment, the idea of a recession makes no sense, retard.

The natural rate of unemployment is not the same as the steady-state rate of unemployment. You're just googling random words Paco.

It's the same thing, retard. You're a legit uneducated brainlet.

Then how do you feel about that your government give a 3-year visa to international student in canada who graduate canadian colleges/uni?
It will encourage the let the educated peoples come in to your cunt, isnt it?

I heard that your PM is pushing that kind of policy since he become a PM

fuck syrian niggers, go back to your desert shithole

Attached: 20190317_004111.jpg (446x571, 126K)

Literally defined as steady-state unemployment in the glossary. You're fucking retarded.

Attached: glossary.png (330x99, 13K)

only a few thousands non-jewish migrants here
cant say im displeased

>borders syria
>occupies golan
>takes pretty much zero syrian refugees
how did israel get away with this

So how does 1/(1+f/s) relate to what the other Canadian wrote, where s is the percentage of people who lose their jobs and f is the percentage of unemployed who find a job?

I ask myself this question alot these days

Attached: 20190317_003747.jpg (505x595, 152K)

He's a turbocapitalist sellout with no backbone