>He is a terrorist. He's a criminal. He's an extremist. But he will be nameless.
Lmao
>He is a terrorist. He's a criminal. He's an extremist. But he will be nameless.
Lmao
Other urls found in this thread:
What does she mean by that?
women cant lead countries
Who is this noname lady by the way
Naming him would immortalize him
He doesn't deserve to be known publicly
Yeah, but she has no power to change the situation though.
His name is already wide spread, and that's the reality.
Denying the publicity.
They'll make it illegal to mention his name imo
The boy uploaded the shooting video is now about to face 17 years in prison
It's to reduce the impact. Nothing can rever the events but refraining from giving opportunities to glorify it will be a better solution for the long run. Making him a public figure would fuel all possible cults forming around him.
His name is Brenton Tarrant and he did nothing wrong. God bless
I think restricting too much would backfire.
Someone needs to tell these career politicians that Harry Potter was not a true story.
>He just mentioned the name
Good luck with your life in prison
Only martyr I worship is Saint Elliot, all others are coward little bitches with nothing to contribute to the world
It'll reduce him to something you'd have to look up on youtube or creepypasta instead of a legitimate public person named on newspapers first pages. Same has been done for many others throughout history and it works, which is why it's used.
His name is Robert Paulson.
>Blessing an atheist terrorist.
Spot the cathocuck
No, Actually his name is Christopher Pole. Ecen his fucking name has Jow Forums in it
not saying his name won't reduce the impact at all, are you kidding me?
just the fact that he did a mass shooting and makes a big impact in all the world will make psychopaths adore him, even if they don't know the name of the shooter
Yeah, I think he will be remembered as "the guy".
Based and Incelpilled
>psychopaths
i think you meant patriots.
>glorifying something doesn't affect the public opinion
ok whatever mossad
This desu. Elliot Rodgers at least fought for something real.
Women can't lead anything
Based and anti-roastiepilled
he'll be remembered as "the Christchurch mass shooter" and no matter what the media or everyone do to prevent it, fucked up individuals that want to commit atrocities will look up to him
I didn't meant that at all, what I said is that not saying it's name won't do shit to change things
What he did was big, it's known in all the world, you can't hide it
Psychopaths will still adore him no matter what you do
>killing invaders
>atrocities
Fucking snowflake
Don't you have some goats to fuck you subhuman shitskin?
It's worth a try, unlike shootings in burgerland where the perpetrators get their obligatory 15 minutes of fame and media circus around them
>Dude lets just ban and block everything because of a graphic video
this is your mind on leftism
>It's worth a try
no it's not, it's pointless and people that made something big should be known if you ask me
Defeatists like you make me a sad polar bear. Just because it happened doesn't mean you can't do anything to try to make the best of whats left. It happened, true, it can't be undone, true, but you can still try to minimize the impact it will have GOING FORWARDS from here. There is a future and that's where "damage control" like this will show their impact.
>he who cannot be named
I though this was a Lord of the Rings type of thing but looks like shooting some scenes in NZ got to their heads irl.
the damage control these red star aussies are doing is unbelievable
why are they doing this?
Yeah, ok. Maybe a few countries would consider making it illegal - and that's being generous - but he would still be notorious outside of that; please consider that tactics like these were only effective in the pre-printing-press era. Ever since then the flow of information has been increasingly out of the hands out countries - these days it's practically impossible to exile someone from the pages of history. In-fact, their attempts to do so is only making him more notorious - people are becoming more interested in him, not less. If they really want this stuff to blow over they would have just treated him like any other terrorist in the past few years. Does anyone remember the names or faces of the concert hall terrorist attack in France - the one with a much higher kill count than this one? I did a few years ago, but for the most part it's been forgotten, and, I would presume, the same holds true of most people. We know the event by heart, but not the perpetrators. Details naturally fade from memory, especially these days, in an era where the flow of information is in constant flux. This guy? He's going to become a meme like Anders. And it's primarily the fault of the governments involved, the press, and the moronic sheep on all over the internet falling for the shooter's plan. What's ironic is that he spelled it out in his manifesto and yet people still haven't caught on.
Everybody knows his name, Sam Hyde
>tfw you know the name of a terrorist but not the premier of New Zealand
Why the fuck do you koreans post a lot here? You people are boring.
>Just because it happened doesn't mean you can't do anything to try to make the best of whats left
true, but doing that won't do shit and it's wrong
>you can still try to minimize the impact
doing that won't minimize it, and I'd argue that trying to minimize this type of things it's wrong, news like this should impact the whole world
exactly my thoughts
youtube.com
>people that made something big should be known if you ask me
But that's how you get copycats and insane cults tbqh
Great, immortalize the idea not the man
BASED
The event impacts the world. The person doesn't have to, he can be reduced to "that guy".
It's a very simple consept and it's beyond me how it has to be explained so many times.
I feel like a lot of these people are secret converts
Look OP, heres a big brain colombian, he gets it. Try to be like him.
>he can be reduced to "that guy".
He can, but they've already botched it.
How does it impact the world?
Just another shooting in most people's eyes
Funeral cover and financial assistance is already provided to everyone (even tourists) who dies in NZ from non-natural causes.
You can tell this image was made by some craptivist on Twitter.
copycats and insane cults will adore them anyways
reducing his an me into "that guy" won't make it less impactful or make psychopaths adore him less, it's pointless
yes, yes you are right
we know
>copycats and insane cults will adore them anyways
Yeah, and ideally you work to decrease the likelihood of that happening
>reddit
>r/worldnews
Seems like no one can lead your country
Why do these people always have the same dumb facial expression? Angelina Jolie already did it. It's like the female version of the soy face.
She's not personally covering anything or setting aside public funds. It's already covered by the ACC. Stop spreading this retarded shit. She hasn't done anything to deserve this much publicity.
Ah yes, because that worked so well the last time.
That's so brave. I have no words for how brave it is
Brenton Tarrant.
Brenton Tarrant.
Brenton Tarrant
Brenton Tarrant
Brenton Tarrant.
Brenton Tarrant.
Brenton Tarrant
Brenton Tarrant.
Brenton Tarrant.
Brenton Tarrant
Brenton Tarrant.
Brenton Tarrant
Brenton Tarrant.
remember thy name
>HALP ME! HALP ME!
>*BANG* *BANG*
Anonymous?
This is what happens when you elect cunts to pretend to be leaders
he already did the impact, he did his shit, it became a global phenomenon
not saying his name, not showing pics of him, or even not saying his gender, won't do shit to make it less impactful or decrease the possibilities that another similar attack happens
psychopaths will still look for his name
>what is accessibility
No wonder MX is such a hellhole.
what do you mean with that?
if I ever shoot up a mosque I'll start quoting Duke Nukem one liners as I do it
Voldemort
Information is only valuable when it's accessible. Like, there is a ton of information out there that you'd want to know but you don't because you havent been exposed to it yet. That's why erasing his name from the headlines is a good thing to do, people in the future will be less likely to get exposed to the person. Sure, whoever sets their goal to research this will be able to do so, but the likelihood of stumbling across will be greatly reduced. Also it'll make it less appealing to copycats since they'll see that they wont be instantly famous and immortalized in headlines if their names get erased instead leaving only the atrocities behind. If you're still missing the point, then you're beyond salvation.
Is she jewish?
Do you know what the Streisand effect is?
What are the chances that you will shoot up a mosque?
But why would you want people to not be exposed to him? People should know these things, his history, his motives, how he looked like and his name
And what makes you think it would make it less appealing to copycats? You think mass shooters only do it for the fame? As far as I am aware, this guy hated immigrants to the point that he wanted to kill them, that's his motive
>Worshipping a virgin loser crybaby
Holy fucking incel. So this is the kind of people who then brags on Jow Forums about being chads, right?
Ofcourse. The event isn't being hidden from anyone, the atrocities are well published and repored about. It's just the shooter that's getting dehumanized and his claim to immortality through headlines revoked. No information about the event is being hidden to make the Streisand effect apply.
The biggest problem you seem to have is that you believe the person = the event. They are two separate entities and should be treated as such.
It would still be a Streisand effect
Not saying his name in the news will make people think: "Hmmm... I wonder what's his name" and they'll look up into it
What's the point of vilifying him to this point but not naming him? It only makes him more immortalized.
To this point I had hoped that there was a slight chance you might be just pretending to be retarded. To my disappointment you've now convinced me otherwise. I regret wasting so much effort on you.
I mean we already saw that happening in our own fucking country, remember that kid that shot up his school 2 years ago in monterrey? He fucking spat out the "you guys are alright, dont come to school" garbage meme before he went and did the sinister, he fucking got inspired by that shit
>american school shooters are a cancer on the world
His names is Robert Paulson.
alright whatever you say man
Sure I guess, but to say that his principal motive was fame would be wrong
That kid was bullied and hated everybody
They are so terrified of this guy it’s a bit surreal
I think it’s because he’s something totally incomprehensible to the average giganormie/boomer
His name is Brenton Tarrant
in jail her name will be Brenda Tarrant
I jail he will become Al'Branad Turrani
Since their are onl muslims in jail anyway.
Elliot did drive a cooler looking car.
Im reinforcing what you said, someone is gonna get inspired by that shithead and do another hit fueled to the brim with Jow Forums memes from 4 and 8 chans respectively and the media will be non the wiser while we sit, clap and laugh at it like the numb monsters we are
It's an interesting strategy. I imagine we can expect to pass an article 13 tier internet speech control bill and probably knee-jerk ban all semi automatics despite the fact that the same politicians did literally nothing for a decade about a well known loophole that was made known to them, that the gunman used to get 30 round mags.
Why is his head so low vaulted?
That can hardly be avoided, though.
You gotta ask the haplogroup autists for that
Censorship in this age will only build solidarity in rebellion against that censorship and hamper legitimate unbiased discussion of subject matters like with nazi Germany.
It upsets anyone with interest in the subject matter only to provide a placebo solution to calm irrationally scared brainlets like yourself. Stop fueling "progress" based on emotion, you faggot.
Be honest, how badly is he going to get raped on his first day behind bars?
hablogrubs won't tell you about that. Vaultedness is much more complicated than small mutations on sex chromosomes that almost certainly don't determine brain height.
He’s like room temp-IQ and couldn’t even make it into college.You really need more of an explanation for his head shape than that?
The event isn't censored, neither is the person. His name is just removed from headlines to remove the sense of getting "immortalized". Event ≠ person.