Which one of these hangul fonts do you find most aesthetically pleasing?

which one of these hangul fonts do you find most aesthetically pleasing?

Attached: Geulggol.png (200x300, 4K)

Other urls found in this thread:

googlefonts.github.io/korean/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It's all moon runes to me

also: which one's the worst?

1 and 3 = pure soy
2 = movie title font
4 = looks official
5 = religious or old moonrunes

The second one is the best. The first and fourth ones look like crap.

The last one, second one is neat too

4

>The first and fourth ones look like crap.
I personally agree with this

궁서체

last one
style look more like chinese character
second one is trying too hard

4

The first one looks the most aesthetically pleasing.
But the fourth one is the best for reading

all disgusting insectoid speak kys

>t. mutt
kys

Attached: 1552989798406.png (1280x720, 885K)

1

the google korean font thing is aesthetic as fuck googlefonts.github.io/korean/

I like the last one because the "jiot" looks the way it's supposed to instead of the others where it's like the two sticks meet in the middle of the horizontal line. "Jiot" is supposed to look like the Japanese katakana "su", that's how Koreans write it in their handwriting. I've only ever seen "jiot" written like that in computer fonts.

Attached: 75623652345352756256432.png (225x225, 2K)

ㅈ

>typefaces are supposed to look like handwriting

Attached: 1509014772329.png (403x448, 53K)

It's ugly
Fuck me for having a preference right? Ah ha ha.
>replying to this thread

2 looks great but i don't think it is viable as handwriting
1st is probably most realistic

𝓪lright I will, f𝓪ggot

Writing: Chinese > Japanese >Korean
Sound: Japanese > Korean > Chinese

The second one, feels less blocky and I'm not a particular fan of the circles in hangul.

The second one is unironcially the North Korean font.