Dividing to two categories of 1.decentralization and security (i'll take into account their code base solution and practically (mining pools in ether for example) 2.scalability.
*I rated a lot of them based on theory, some of them don't even have a testnet running / aren't open source, I took into account how they're functioning rightnow and how they potentially could be in the near future.
Ethereum:9-2 (potential to be 10-8/9 when/if state sharding implemented) Zilliqa: 8-9 Eos:3-9 Dfinity:7-9 Cardano:7-7 Radix:8-8 Neo:2-5 Kadena:9-6 Quarkchain:3-9 Solana:3-10 Tezos:7-4 Icon:5-4 Rchain:5-8 Nuls:5-6 Pchain:4-6 Thundertoken:4-9 Block collider:8-4 Cosmos:5-6 Skycoin:7-6 (surprisingly good, cood looks pretty decent according to my coders friends) Vechain:3-5 Ontology:4-7 Nem:3-1 Holochain:4-8 Iota:3-6
>Neo:2-5 misinformed. Neo shat itself at 5tps. This proves your ratings are based on marketing rather than reality.
Robert Thomas
>1.decentralization and security >EOS: 3 nice effort user but EOS gets a big fat ZERO for security and a 2 for decentralization and a 10 for totalitarianism (which doesn't count in your scale). either way who gives a fuck about scalability when everything else about the project is a total incompetent clusterfuck with a dash of totalitarianism. >EOS: 1t-9c >t for totalitarian >c for culsterfuck
Ian Garcia
It's in comparison to other platforms, i can't give it zero when neo/vechain/.. exist.
They can do much more than 5tps, doesn't matter when they sacrfices security/decentralization this much. we are searching here for the platform who find the best balance between both.
Parker Bailey
it's not a platform
Jason Wood
>i'll take into account their code base solution >cood looks pretty decent according to my coders friends Why would anyone listen to some random shitter like you?
While I don't agree entirely with all of these, it was interesting to read and think about why one might rate them as you did. Normally I don't respond to threads like this, but I want you to know that there aren't only haters who read threads like this and that there are people who do enjoy stuff like this.
It also encourages discussion about specific items on the list, which is good.
Thanks bro. which specific ratings you don't agree with?
Jack Moore
BTW, I'm not an expert at all, informative guys are always welcome..
Jack Jackson
Have to agree with this user. It's nice to have good discussion going.
I've only been following Ethereum and EOS and I would have to agree with the ratings you have given them. I'm personally hoping Ethereum sorts out it's scalibility issues.
Benjamin Jones
bump
Andrew Rivera
Want to hear more about your opinions on zilliqa
Isaiah Morgan
Really great imo, i think it's one of the best options to use while ETH is working on state sharding. my concerns is that scilla is not turing complete, i think developers won't like the inflexibility aspect of it. also they have storage issues (something that state sharding could help solving it)
Jayden Edwards
you're a moron
ethereum is the most centralized joke of a project on par with onecoin
only thing centralized ethereum supporters should think about is how to commit suicide fastest as that's the only positive thing you can do with your worthless lives
ethereum is 0 and 0
fucking morons
Lincoln Jackson
Zilliqa purposely avoided Turing conpleteness. Unless you're modeling something like gravity or requiring something that could be infinitely repeating, ZIL will be fine. Turing Completeness is a meme.
Isaiah Baker
then how are people building on it
everything built on ethereum has been built on bitcoin before just fine
seriously, centralized ethereum promoters or w/e other centralized premine scammers are pushing these days don't know first thing about decentralization. these morons are calling centrally premined shitcoins like eth decentralized which proves their stupidity.
ethereum isn't turing complete either. it's exactly same as bitcoin script half decade earlier in computation.
the only thing scammers promoting ethereum like vitalik deserve is being raped and killed
Hunter Brooks
You sky scammers are creative, I'll give you that
Adrian Brown
elaborate
Justin Martinez
top fucking kek newweeknewacct detected kill yourself, nigger
Camden Jenkins
no
Christopher Flores
Neblio?
Michael Green
kek
Jaxon Myers
This kind of old platforms (aka "ETH killers") are dead imo, if they didn't make it big on the last bull run they'll probably never make it, new projects with much better tech will try their luck.
90% from here are still very early, some don't even have a whitepaper.
But i'll rate some of them:
Credits:0-9 Hashgraph:5-9 Ankr:6-3 Qtum:8-4 Fusion:6-6 (tho i really like Fusion)
Samuel Anderson
Hahahhaaha
Nothing beats ETH for any of it. The only reason op THINKS those other pieces of shit are more scalable than ETH is the fact that NO ONE uses them. ETH gets high fees some times because every man and his dog is actually USING it.
Kys OP
Jason Wilson
Lots of them have a whitepaper and code on github, some even have a testnet
Xavier Lewis
btw invested into edenchain, fantom and blockcollider which keeps delaying and having problems. Elrond Network looks really good with their prototype
Justin Walker
Butthurt much? Face facts faggot. The entire world will run on the Ethereum blockchain in the future.
Whatever shitcoin you invested in will become an ERC20 or plummet straight to zero.
Maybe there will be a niche for BCH and XMR in the future but 99.9% of blockchain usecases will run on Ethereum.
ETH already won, just waiting for low information third worlders to wake up and smell the coffee.
99% of blockchain developers 99% of blockchain entrepreneurs Soon 99% of all crypto value
ETH to 3 trillion dollar market cap in 3 years.
Andrew Foster
ethereum is like a 2012 macbook pro, nice low barrier to entry but you can also do complicated things with it
Eli Edwards
Why did you rate nem 3-1? Its has decentralization in it along with decent scaling. You also can't rate Tezos scaling like that, they're self evolving platform, it depends on how they implment scaling. Holochain is only not decentralized in terms of supply inssuance, the 4 should be significantly higher.
Josiah Perez
>ADA doesn't exist >7-7 what did he mean by this?
Sebastian Ortiz
I'll look into elrond soon
averaged potential with actual functioning product (of course i rated highly projects i believe could pull it off, very subjective)
Matthew Gutierrez
> Spends 6 months developing product > Spends $150k marketing product > ETH chain congested with cats Platform risk is too high at the moment.
Daniel Rodriguez
Hmm looks like no one gives a fuck about that. People are still developing like crazy on Ethereum because they know it’s the only blockchain worth giving a fuck about
Caleb Lewis
>altcoins >decentralization Pick one
Hudson Morris
As a developer I care quite deeply about ETH's inability to scale. It's prohibitive. Hope there are some solutions coming soon, otherwise I'll just switch to EOS or KMD or something.
Aaron Allen
Or ZIL you mean? >to EOS No.
Evan Bailey
I don't give a fuck as long as it won't interfere with my user experience. EOS is fine, fast and free. Don't know much about ZIL.
