Wtf I hate capitalism now

wtf I hate capitalism now

Attached: 902D647C-7A59-4675-AD96-35CC66227F21.jpg (500x294, 78K)

Other urls found in this thread:

finance.yahoo.com/news/billionaire-ken-langone-income-inequality-driver-happy-181123092.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

So by one picture you are convinced kek

then gtfo

>what is satire
>takes everything literally as read
Stick a 12 gauge into the roof of your mouth.

Attached: 1519158360084.jpg (250x250, 5K)

>OMG empty houses should be tots hosting Syrian refugees

Attached: 1531654950489.jpg (183x230, 18K)

Depends where you live bruh. If you live in the USA thats actually a 3rd world country for everyone earning less than 200k a year. If you live in an actual first world country like; the netherlands sweden norway etc you wont see this shit. Lived in 8 countries for 5 years atleast.

>TWF
>Did not buy silver

Attached: SilverBoomer.jpg (678x547, 76K)

finance.yahoo.com/news/billionaire-ken-langone-income-inequality-driver-happy-181123092.html

The USA should calculate the real costs of homeless people, getting people of the streets actually save government money . If you then allowed opiod addicts to get alternative fixes they even can become productive members of society.

Win Win

your life is satire

Just send all homeless and drug degenerates to hard slave labor . No money spent on welfare and it’s unlikely those degenerates will ever become productive tax paying members of society anyway. Problem solved.

They're living the care free tent life, 90% of them are homeless for mental reasons, dropping them in a house with bills++ will just fuck them up more.

That shows the imbalance of demand and supply. The built buildings for the middle class even tho they could sell lower class homes easier. They just invest in better quality homes because the ROI is better, but they built to many of them. Actually these people are bad capitalists.

Why stop at whole houses?

I'm pretty sure the artist has vacant rooms in his house. Just shelter a homeless person in it.

Do you really *neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed* that many vacant rooms?

This. Empty houses are more valuable than houses with niggers in them.

>productive tax paying members of society anyway
Good Goy! user, you have zero clue what you are on about! Check out 'the grace commission' about taxes.
t. you have no idea how bad it really is

Giving free houses to the homeless solves the homeless problem is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Anyone who has ever encountered homeless people know they are almost all mentally ill or drug addicts and if they are given free homes they always just turn into dens of drugs, crime, and prostitution because this is the only lifestyle these people know and it's why they are homeless in the first place

Libshits outright refuse to understand this. Or maybe their limited mental capacity does not permit it. I'm not sure which.

It's because most of them live in a bubble and have this idea that homeless people "are just regular people who fell on hard times", and it's a view that doesn't match reality. Just like how most white liberal's views on blacks are formed while keeping a safe distance from them and never encountering them in their daily lives

because gov sets interests rates subsidies people who should not be able to afford children breed down the iq gradient also misallocate into realestate what do you expect?

Let the people move in and breed more lower iq people?

long geo group

No shit, OP capitalism was a failed experiment. It worked okay when it was the most efficient way to distribute scarce resources, but that's no longer true. It'll be over in less than 50 years.

no sane libtard actually wants to put homeless people in vacant houses, only mentally ill sjw onionlords would ever suggest such a retarded idea, mostly because they are the homeless ones. go back to your containment board and stop watching infowars cucklord.

This isn't a result of free market capitalism. This is a result of central bank market manipulation, which is against capitalism. State control like this is more socialism.

>government has hands all over industry, industry has hands all over government; rules and regulations made to block out competition and protect cronies from ever being faced with real competition
>successful individuals who aren't a part of the corporatocracy charged in excess of 50% of their wealth annually
>free market capitalism
uh-huh, tell me more about how "free market capitalism" has failed and how we need even more socialism and even fewer corporations in any given industry

You are getting it

it's the result of retarded home buyers fomoing limited supply in the same manner pajeets on biz fomo into shitcoins. they both end the same way. the banks share fault though because they are letting people borrow enough money to keep it going including taking on sub prime borrowers and 3% down payments.

>invest millions in building houses for tent people
>as expected, more than 50% fall behind/default payments
>have to declare bankruptcy because you tried to help unhelpables

Great plan OP

>Bunch of welfare leeches and burger flippers surviving on mom's allowance trying to discuss the finer details of capitalism
TOP
KEK

literally every internet forum talks this way about capitalism because only poor or middle class folks talk on internet forums and can never see the big picture. also you're not offering any sophisticated ideas yourself so we gotta assume you are poor too.

too bad homeless people tend to destroy things they've been given for free anyway.

This
2008 collapse largely happened because the government forced banks to give loans to minorities too. Why the fuck does noone ever talk about that.

Attached: 1461568247376.jpg (318x359, 34K)

>peopleless homes generate revenue for the home owners/banks some how and they don't want people in it to pay mortgage with interest
Do they unironically think the banks don't want to generate money?

>having to pay for things you own

Wow, what a terrible idea. What dumbass thought of this? What if we all shared everything?! That way we would all own everything and no one would be unequal! What do you think Jow Forums?

The homeless aren't people though.

yeah it really sucks in canada right now theres tons of vaccant houses that just sit empty, owned by chinks as a long-term investment. they would rather let it sit vacant and keep the bill high in order to not drive down prices for their peers.

which in turns drives up rent for everyone else because there's a smaller pool of places to live.

i legitimately want to become a fire bug and burn these places down to the ground 1 by 1. our government has failed us.

unironically, crypto made me realize how psychotic, irrational and psychopathic markets are

Attached: EpTTgLlKAWuICXnCIcIJa6eCHL4ANAKcyNRPrjcIiMY.jpg (640x672, 89K)

Attached: D5ZouibupKfb4whmZcQd9VdY3AI1Kfu8yjK6-YGmLMw.jpg (640x473, 67K)

You really don't want niggers ruining your neighborhood.

>housing as a human right
How do you even implement this? I'm not saying it's wrong but seems like you have to be post-scarcity to materialize this.

Attached: oiFvHKe-hSeiYgwwOhEMZRXk_GBo3BiO3Seumy2eYQI.png (640x574, 230K)

Define "homeless" in that image, and who would deserve it more?

>person A who works hard, pays tax, but can't afford a house so rents
>person B who doesn't work, doesn't pay tax, and sleeps rough because of whatever circumstances

Realistically, giving person B it makes less sense since they are basically worthless in a capitalist society.

Newfag

They'll just get a check from the insurance company and buy another property. Not worth the risk.

Attached: 1520300562985.jpg (346x302, 8K)

they are unironically a smaller cost on society if you give them small 1 room apartments, allowance so they can buy a rice and beans, and access to legalized drugs

If the homeless would compensate the builder and the land owner they could live in the homes they worked on and invested in.
>logic

what a fucking gratingly, seethingly arrogant sack of being-gay-is-my-only-defining-trait shit
small business owners who are in industries that can hire immigrants who are over on (expensive as fuck) government programs and work below minimum wage would literally be run out of business if they didn't do what their competitors would inevitably do, given the same conditions, to remain in the game
forcing immigration on people (at the expense of the taxpayer, no less) is just another way to make society more dog-eat-dog—so, DON'T GO FUCKING BLAMING THE BUSINESS OWNERS for trying as hard as they can to not operate at a net loss as you force them to perform one more trick in an endless series of retarded financial and legal gymnastics so that your bureaucrats can retire at age 40
these are the kind of mentally stunted chimps who think that jeff bezos is an example of a capitalist, for fuck's sake

Those people are homeless 100% by their own choice.

Anyone financially responsible can bring themselves out of homelessness in a matter of months.

das wacist

So what is the argument here?

Companies should stop hiring immigrants?
Immigrants should stop coming?

>if i type kek instead of lol every time, no one will know im new

But remember user we can't just recreate mental institutions and place them there because Jews need yet another wedge to fuck up white society :]

What are they gonna do when they run out of letters for LGBTQIA etc. Start on the numbers?

bro canada sucks. we were fucked so hard by baby boomers and faggots in quebec