How can London compete with new York?

How can London compete with new York?

Attached: download.jpg (300x168, 13K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-45971226
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>300x168

Attached: jokukuku.jpg (223x225, 7K)

How often is it used as a setting in British TV and film?

Just zoom in, wait, are you not a phone poster?

I've been to London and I find it better looking than what I saw of New York although I've not visited the latter.

Default

Just like New York

Way more powerful thanks to the city of London

The streets are better in London, but NYC wins skyline-wise.

They both have their awesome areas, london was goofier though, which i liked. Top three cities ive spent time in
Chicago>london>new york>>>oslo

What made it goofy?

Freeway entrance into single european market

Skyline doesn't matter when you're walking around, i.e. 99% of people 99% of the time.

Exactly, which is why I think London is more aesthetic. Skylines make nice postcards though.

everybody kept trying to stick their fingers in my ass

Bank > Canary Wharf

It might not be New York but the skyline in London is becoming pretty cool. Seems like there's a new high rise building every month. When I was a kid the only skyscraper in the city was "One Canada Water", the tower at the right with the pointy blue roof.

Attached: 45788.jpg (1600x1066, 610K)

One Canada Square*

Attached: 44284.jpg (2048x1536, 838K)

They're all getting knocked down when Charles ascends to the throne.

Attached: 40213012273_6bf430f694_b.jpg (1024x819, 517K)

Awfully short aren't they?

They should close city airport and get rid of those "viewing" rules

What kind of archaelogical stuff gets dug up whenever they prepare the foundation pit for one of those skyscrapers near central London? They must be digging through layer after layer of historical sites and structures.

london is built on clay whereas new york is built on granite
it's why tunnels can get built really quickly in london but take a long time in new york

Photos never really do it justice, in real life they seem huge. Even every other American city seems short compared to NYC.

Idk man, I always thought they looked bigger in photos.

I've walked in those areas and they just looked like big flats. Underwhelmed.

They are equal in terms of being filled to the brim with ethnic trash from the 3rd world.

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-45971226

Have sex.

Si let's bang ;;;;))))

They're both miserable shitholes unless you're working at some multinational making upper class income.

If you make anything less than you're either losing too much of that income to taxes to be able to live comfortably or you're a shitstain making jack squat so the govt gives you subsidized housing, food stamps etc.

Just be wealthy bro

Pfff, How can NY compete with Rēzekne ?

Attached: Rēzekne.jpg (1000x541, 217K)

both is gay

Attached: 1024px-Sealandafterfire2.jpg (1024x593, 87K)

big cities are too much for me.

Attached: tokyo.jpg (1920x1080, 976K)

Too much fun

It cannot and does not.

Both are the same internationalist culture less shitholes

By acting as the financial hub to an enormous economic union.

Attached: Screenshot_82.jpg (600x600, 33K)

By not stinking like piss on every corner