Redpill me on nationalism vs globalism

Is nationalism or globalism better for the economy?

Attached: nationalismglobalism.jpg (1429x907, 697K)

Anarchism

Well done globalism is better than poor nationalism.

who cares

get money

organize your community

One is not better than the other

Full globalism has flaws, full capitalism has flaws. A good balance ideally gets the best of both. Kind of how two party political systems balance each other so as to not go too crazy in either direction

>hatred towards others and white genocide on two twidderent sides

t. green corner

Attached: retardedlibertarianleft.png (2300x2499, 536K)

By economy do you mean better standard of living for the "average person" or rich getting richer? Globalism seems to be better for rich people(not trying to sound socialist here).

Who would nationalism make the average person better off? If manufacturing jobs were brought back to America, wouldn't that make the average Chinese person, for instance, poorer?

There is literally nothing wrong with rounding up and executing communists.

Larger market size it's always positive, read fucking Adam Smith..

this

>correct views
that should read
>What do you mean, we can't just 'let them eat cake'?

Globalism is a side effect of increasing energy per capita, but this plateaued since the 2008 financial crisis and is falling, and the fall is accelerating with the collapse in oil investments since 2014. Every nation that has peaked in energy per capita is reverting back to nationalism, the UK, America, and Italy are recent examples of this. Unless a new miracle source of energy is found, globalism will continue to collapse. With the thermodynamic oil collapse looming, globalism will most likely be completely dismantled by 2030.

Attached: Thermodynamic oil hypercollapse.jpg (952x8657, 2.69M)

accurate

But is it positive for the average person or just the elite?

Because lower energy costs makes international shipping cheaper?

Dirt poor third worlders and the ultra rich benefit, everybody else in the middle gets fucked

You dont weigh in know how enough into your equation. The explosion of the internet also means the explosion of the labor market and the available talent pool. Whether it will be cheaper to fly in a chinese team of engineers to build your pool is debatable but scyscrapers in today's third world countries will be and are being built by teams of engineers from all over the world. Globalisation as a global market will not stop but accelerate, imo.

Therefore nationalism is pointless unless you want to go to war.

*Know-how

*Nationalism not cap

what if I don't care about capitalism one way or another? What if I only care about personal and local autonomy?

Capitalism has effects on personal and local autonomy, m8.

Without the state there's nothing to stop workers from laying off their bosses or tenants from evicting their land lord. So land lords and bosses would have to prove their position to be mutually beneficial to all parties involved.

>he thinks that the government acts in the interests of the people instead of big corporations
Without the state, there's also nothing allowing big corporations to enact predatory regulations in order to form oligopolies/monopolies, and nothing allowing big corporations to hold patents.

Without the State, corporations would fill the power vacuum as the new "state".

Peasants would have to play along with it. Wouldn't rule it out, since we're current populated by brainless zombies. But the whole idea is to wake the sheep enough to undermine corporatism.