Why are they having so many kids?

Why are they having so many kids?

Attached: Africa.png (1200x1200, 399K)

Because they have a high death rate and high infant mortality.

there ain't any kind of knowledge about preservatives, and even if they were, the high mortality and low natality would lead those countries to their ruin

Basic demographics.
got it partly right, they are in the middle of the demographic transition, modern medicine and better nutrition is temporarily leading to a massive growth in population like that Europe experienced in the 19th century or Latin America did in the 20th, it's normal, no, the world won't turn black, most African countries will most likely stop growing in population by 2030.

>most African countries will most likely stop growing in population by 2030.
top lel

Attached: population-projections.gif (884x784, 1.22M)

You do know that these projections normally use logarithmic growth projections and they are rarely adjusted to take the demographic transition into account, right?.

Oh wait, I didn't see you flair, excuse me, I forgot most Americans in Jow Forums are retarded, don't mind what I said.

they don't have the technology to spend their times with useless things like we spend our time on Jow Forums, so they fuck instead plus not enough knowledge about preservatives

Although, to be fair, 2030 was probably too optimistic, 2050 or 2060 seems more likely.

you can see the reverse thing in Japan

Because many of them die,

You also have to take into consideration expansion into new areas for habitation or improvement in technology. The continent is far from being utilized to it's fullest.

>The continent is far from being utilized to it's fullest.
The same could be argued for The Americas though, most countries in the continent are not really very densely populated either, and I don't see how it would be possible for the Congolese jungles or the Namibian desert to be inhabitable in any moment, regardless of technological development.

I dont think North Africa has a lot of kids anymore.
That's false. Many used to die but with modern medicine and food aid from the west they basically just die from war now. It's why their population is exploding.

The Netherlands used to flood every 12 hours. The Romans called us crazy for living here.

So you have a swamp, where buildings sink into the ground, that gets flooded twice a day. How can you live there?

Well, by not being a bunch of lazy niggers and fix your country.

It took years for you to reach that. Also the whole fact that environmentalism was not a thing back then.

> I don't see how it would be possible for the Congolese jungles or the Namibian desert to be inhabitable in any moment, regardless of technological development.

Look at the desert regions in America for an example.

>desert regions in America
Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada are not really that heavily populated, other than the cities that grew up alongside the important rail/highway hubs leading to the west.

every single population in history has had the same pattern. Have a few kids as hunter gatherers. With agriculture have an absolute fuckload because so many people die. When industry and medicine come keep having kids for a generation or two making the population go off the charts and then settle back down into eventually being below replacement level.
The only difference is le niggers

Because they're having an economic improvement. Malthusian trap it's called

>The Malthusian trap or population trap is a condition whereby excess population would stop growing due to shortage of food supply leading to starvation. It is named for Thomas Robert Malthus, who suggested that while technological advances could increase a society's supply of resources, such as food, and thereby improve the standard of living, the resource abundance would enable population growth, which would eventually bring the per capita supply of resources back to its original level. Some economists contend that since the industrial revolution, mankind has broken out of the trap.[1][2] Others argue that the continuation of extreme poverty indicates that the Malthusian trap continues to operate.[3] Others further argue that due to lack of food availability coupled with excessive pollution, developing countries show more evidence of the trap.[4]

It'll slow down in the future.

People were having 5~6 kids here in the 70~80s and then it suddenly stopped nowadays we have a birth rate of
>1.73 births per woman (2016)

This is normal.

Because they are BLACK BVLLS and not wh*te sissies

That applies to the Namib desert too.