>protestant work ethic
Protestant work ethic
>mediterreanean lifestyle
>something HAS to be done about low productivity, people just CANNOT sit around doing nothing at work!
There is no Protestant work ethic, there is a Calvinist work ethic.
Martin Luther said to accept ones station in life, and do good work, nothing of get rich or die trying (Calvin).
What probably made "Protestant" countries more successful was that:
- Most of them had Atlantic sea access.
- They had a high literacy rate
- Swiss cantons dominated by merchants became protestants (not Swiss cantons dominated by protestants became merchants).
I do believe whites got rich by stealing labor and resources from others.
trillions of wealth taken from Indonesia now in hands of dutch banks.
trillions of wealth from africa now in hands of the French,
labor and resources have a price and whites took them without paying anything.
so whites are not smarter, they are just more violent and better at stealing. a barbarian behavior.
World domination was a consequence of Europe being better.
Europe being better was not a consequence of world domination.
Europe had hundreds of universities by the 1300s, all communicating, sharing and storing knowledge in Latin.
Europe invented the printing press before Columbus.
Etc.
Europeans nations got rich more or less independently of imperialism. No one earned more from conquest than the Spaniards and the Portuguese, thousands of tons of gold were brought over the atlantic on their ships. Yet they went from world powers to poor backwaters in a little over a century.
In any case it is only in the modern world under systems of morality only really taken seriously BY Europeans that conquest isn't a valid way to gain wealth.
Why aren't pathetic butthurt third worlders like yourself complaining about the Aztec empire, the japanese or the fucking MONGOLS?
>World domination was a consequence of Europe being better.
I disagree, world domination started because europe was a hell to live so europeans started to think about find new places to go and live.
if europe was a paradise then why they needed to go to africa, america?
>Europe had hundreds of universities by the 1300s, all communicating, sharing and storing knowledge in Latin.
Europe invented the printing press before Columbus.
all that knowledge didnt prevent the massive wars inside europe. even with all the university people in europe was still suffering.
euros needed to destroy hundreds of different civilizations around the world to realize they were wrong.
instead many other civilization were peaceful since their beginning.
so euro morality means nothing for civilization that never were as aggressive as whites. europe has been under continuous 3000 years of wars, Is that the famous euro morality?
>Why aren't pathetic butthurt third worlders like yourself complaining about the Aztec empire, the japanese or the fucking MONGOLS?
- the aztecs in their 300 years of history never killed as many people as whites nations did.
-the japanese got evil after copying euro customs
-the mongols did evil only once and their empire was divided and collapsed after 50 years , instead whites did evil so many times and their colonies existed for 400 years.
if protestants are so productive then why are they so poor?
Also the church considered loans as usury, so merchant class in catholic europe was non existent
>instead many other civilization were peaceful since their beginning.
>all that knowledge didnt prevent the massive wars inside europe. even with all the university people in europe was still suffering.
Perpetual war was a facet of all civilizations not long ago.
>many other civilization were peaceful since their beginning.
AHAHAHAHA
>- the aztecs in their 300 years of history never killed as many people as whites nations did.
>-the mongols did evil only once and their empire was divided and collapsed after 50 years , instead whites did evil so many times and their colonies existed for 400 years.
So they didn't lack the will, just the ability or opportunity.
lmao you know literally nothing about history.
en.wikipedia.org
You're like a stereotype of leftist history depicting muh magical pee-oo-cee as peaceful idealists and Europeans as bloodthirsty savages.
Maybe Europeans were just better than everyone else in doing what everyone did, war and conquest? Infact considering that NO ONE except Europeans ever owe up to "historical crimes" and the fact that ONLY europeans got rid of slavery or inventing concepts such as human rights and equality, Europeans are uniquely moral.
What Arabs are talking about their slave trade in blacks?
If it weren't for Europeans your people would most likely be toiling as slaves of a stronger group of Indians. A group that would have absolutely no reservations about it.
Don't know why you're so eager to accept the flawed view of history which depict your ancestors as a bunch of pussies anyway.
Quite redpilled post
>if europe was a paradise then why they needed to go to africa, america?
To gather resources that weren't available in Europe such as rare metals, spices and other stuff
Dunno what you guys are talking about. Religious people make for the perfect work force because they’re basically trained slaves without a master.
>Dunno what you guys are talking about. Religious people make for the perfect work force because they’re basically trained slaves without a master.
Reminder that Europe is going to go extinct in our lifetimes and the center of Western civilization is the US and not Europe. And those are good things.
>I disagree, world domination started because europe was a hell to live so europeans started to think about find new places to go and live.
So you're just ignoring violent Asian expansions west? MENAs militaristic attempts and successes into Europe? Not to mention all of the wars in both, Africa, the Americas, Polynesia, etc. that involved related peoples?
Just look at the composition of the military, or police force even. A shitload of them are fundies.
Do mestizos not realize how pathetic their eternal butthurt towards Europe is?
He’s right. I for one, look forward to you all becoming a chink colony in the near future.
>Europe is going to be extinct
In what way? We are going to be more diverse you mean?
If diversity is extinction, then the US is a desert already, and Mexicans is the scorching sun.
How the US can be considered the centre of Western civilization when there is a hobo in every main street and there is no work protection (you can be fired at a whim) and no social security net (temporarily bad health can ruin you).
based, euros are warmongers pretending to be civilized
>How the US can be considered the centre of Western civilization
because the US is the only relevant western country along with germany, UK and france, and even those are just american vassal states
>Dude, don't worry about sins, you can just buy your place in heaven
kek, at cherrypicking your pic.
more than 500 entries in the following list.
en.wikipedia.org
also those chinese wars are internal wars , almost never against a foreign nation.
>and the fact that ONLY europeans got rid of slavery
this happened not because whites felt compassion for the slaves, this happened because economic reasons slaves already were so expensive to maintain in the modern world.
>inventing concepts such as human rights and equality,
this only happened after the birth of communism, so whites started to talk about human rights to exploited peoples to avoid let them support communist ideas.
whites gave freedom to their colonies not because good will and compassion, whites gave freedom to their colonies in order to prevent them get aligned with the communist world and then fight for their freedom.
>Europeans are uniquely moral.
whites needed morality as key to keep their nations stable, instead morality was never developed by other races because they were already stable without the need of the morality concept.
>If it weren't for Europeans your people would most likely be toiling as slaves of a stronger group of Indians.
slaves didnt existed in the pre-colonial Peru, search about it on google.
amerindians love to work hard instead lazy whites are always in need of slaves. its their barbarian mindset of stealing from others as the vikings did and never developed civilization in their homes countries.
>Don't know why you're so eager to accept the flawed view of history which depict your ancestors as a bunch of pussies anyway.
destruction is always wrong, and whites are the masters of destruction, they destroy they own continent, europe, each 50 years.
and then they need to waste natural resources to build again their cities. this is not an efficient use of resources,
norway , the whitest country on earth, burned most of their oil reserves in just 40 years.
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT BE VIOLENT