Think about it logically, is this bad?

incels are an extreme minority, most guys have relationship options but choose not to do anything stupid like marriage or knocking a girl up at a drunken house party, inadvertently these are both now the main ways that fertility is sustained meaning only the ultra-low class is reproducing

see: maybe in HUEland all you monkeys have kids before your lisenced to drive but in first world countries that actually have chads things are different

>sex
>children

>inadvertently these are both now the main ways that fertility is sustained meaning only the ultra-low class is reproducing
again this idiocracy myth of low class reproducing more than the rich is no longer the case. Most of the childless men in developed countries are low income men.

Attached: Fertility-Rates-Between-The-Rich-And-Poor-Have-Narrowed.png (1214x842, 65K)

Nice anecdotal evidence, men, you destroyed me
low income is related to ugliness, but ugly poor women can still get a normie

The real question is; what are woman doing wrong?

Anything that shrinks the worlds population is a good thing

thanks for confirming my point and also that you're too low iq to read a fucking chart correctly.

For some reason I think these two things are connected

>tinder basically started in 2008 and is owned by the clinton foundation
wat