HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI WERE WAR CRIMES YOU MONSTER!!

>HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI WERE WAR CRIMES YOU MONSTER!!

Attached: 1554672558753.png (231x218, 8K)

>YOU CAN'T JUST KILL THOSE CHINESE CIVILIANS AND EXPERIMENT ON THEM! THEY ARE PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND I!

Attached: 1554319088753.png (647x778, 17K)

this is the worst meme i've ever seen

hiroshima and nagasaki is just a proof america is dick haha

>USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS ON CIVILIANS? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU

Attached: 1554486384461.jpg (456x429, 34K)

>NOOOO STOP YOU CAN'T BEHEAD AUSTRALIAN POW'S

Attached: 1554674896820.png (644x800, 198K)

America should officially apologise and beseech them for their forgiveness for their hideous war crime. Millions of innocent civilians were wiped out due to their inhumane use of nuclear weapons.

>LITERALLY ANYTHING LOL IM MAKING MEMES ON THE INTERNET

Attached: soyak.png (674x720, 141K)

>America should officially apologise and beseech them for their forgiveness for their hideous war crime. Millions of innocent civilians were wiped out due to their inhumane use of nuclear weapons.

Attached: 1554290551245.gif (413x243, 51K)

>this is the worst meme i've ever seen

Attached: 1554097763449.png (782x758, 127K)

>America should officially apologise and beseech them for their forgiveness for their hideous war crime. Millions of innocent civilians were wiped out due to their inhumane use of nuclear weapons.

Attached: 1553275721506.png (928x608, 218K)

Absolute state of Western world

>Agent Orange in Vietnam was a crime against humanity

Attached: _1553932928478.gif (800x371, 193K)

>Nukes
>Killing millions
There were tens of thousands dead from the nukes and maybe a couple of hundred thousand from the radiation.

We aren't going to apologize because it was necessary. Would you want us to apologize if we nuked Pyongyang off the map during the Korean War and ended it there?

It wasn't necessary you fat low iq fuck. Americans are just faggots who can't fight fair.

The 2 nukes only killed only about ~200k. They didn't do that much compared to the firebombings which absolutely crippled japan.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were literal state terrorism
Show the other party that you cancause so much chaos and kill so many civillians that they accept your demands
Surd, it might have been necessary to win the war by their terms. But how does wanting to do literally anything necessary to end the war on your terms justified?
By that reasoning anyone could just nuke anyone and justify it by saying that they just wanted to win.
Also, Japan was getting kicked out of the mainland and could no longer pose a threat to other countries' civilians

>T-THE JAPANESE WERE TRYING TO SURRENDER, I SWEAR
All of you schizos denying actual history always say this but never provide any evidence of your claims. Unless you somehow provide a source, I will not believe you. Nukes were the best option.

War isn't clean, you sissy. You have to be willing to do WHATEVER it takes, regardless of how immoral it may be, to win.

No
Confining them to the islands and putting them under sanctions until they are willing to talk peace (or go back to the stone age in their pigheadedness) was the best option
Killing hundreds of thousands of civilians just like that can't be justified

It's better to frighten an enemy into submission than to beat him. Nukes saved lots of lives on both sides since troop invasion would be a bloodbath. Collateral damage, m8.
>Also, Japan was getting kicked out of the mainland and could no longer pose a threat to other countries' civilians
They didn't surrender, which means they were a threat.

> it was necessary
you are told like that. show me you think of that way yourself.

Nothing wrong with nuking subhumans.

The whole world, including you is going to get wiped out at some point because you opened the nuclear pandora box
Be edgy all you want, but the odds of you ending up a smoldering pile of bones or at least dying from hunger or radiation once nuclear winter kicks in are probably in the double digits

You know what would have caused zero lives lost?
This

That was an option, the Japanese wouldn't surrender and everyone back home wanted to war the ended. There were only two ways this was going to ended: an invasion of the mainland, which would have cause an estimated fifteen million more deaths, or nuclear bombing, which only killed around two hundred thousand. The first option also includes the execution of the Japanese emperor, which would have destabilized the entire country.
It's basic history. Okinawa had been captured and all that was left was the mainland. The Japanese government wouldn't surrende and the Japanese people were prepared to fight to the bitter end. The estimated caulities of a mainland invasion was around fifteen million, so Truman took the other option: nuking Japanese cities.

War is hell

War never changes

Attached: IMG-20180315-WA0003.png (683x489, 270K)

Quite a few countries were independently researching nuclear weapons. Germans had 7 independent operations and could have created the first atomic bomb with some luck. Soviets would make their own only a few years later.

>STOP THERE ARE RULES TO WARFARE
>THINK OF THE GENEVA CONVENTION

Attached: discord is for soyboys.png (1200x800, 74K)

It's not our fault we filled up our special meter first. Better luck next time, Japan.

It wouldn't be a problem if we invaded the USSR like churchill wanted to. China should have been destroyed during the Korean War but Truman was weak.