When someone thinks of cowboys they actually think of outlaw gunslingers and falsely associate them with each other...

...there was no welfare back then
and whites were like 90% of world population during colonization, before poopskins got the polio vaccine

they were pioneers back then, builders, workers, settlers, inventors, explorers, colonizers
we can hardly even imagine such great humans in these days of reckless faggotry

Beta wagecuck serf detected. They actually worked just like feudalism where there is the ranch owner (lord) and the cowboys (serfs). Both of them beta in their own way and they cannot exist without the other. Toiling like a retard is also the mark of a beta wagecuck serf.

t. Albanian

It's like Cowboys' image were created by some Italians in the 60s. WOAH.

>builders, workers, settlers, inventors, colonizers
>same as bandit outlaws
Now I see how cowboys got their reputation, betas will try to leech alpha reputation.

Stay and work and work and toil till you bleed just so your retirement money will be cut in half :)

...how are they servants, when there is no one to serve? they moved into unoccupied lands or took the land from the natives

being a rancher and starting a ranch where there is nothing doesnt make you a farm hand or medieval peasant, people moving into the wild west owned the wild west before and during federal annexation

The cowboy profession often attracted people with dubious pasts. Hence the association with desperados is accurate.

read fenimore cooper or something
these people DID exist and even during their time there was only a very fuzzy line between shit shoveler and badass outlaw

>only a very fuzzy line
No line at all. A gunslinger was a gunslinger and a shit shoveler was a shit shoveler. Proof? If you told the gunslinger to start shoveling shit he would shoot you.

>...how are they servants, when there is no one to serve?
Its almost as if I explained the situation on the post you replied.
no fuzzy line at all*

That's stupid, Bill Hickock worked as a drover

that doesn't even make sense. he would not shoot you, he would have elected to shovel shit out of his own volition. think of anglo pirates for example too. they were just seamen who had intermittent opportunities to go rogue and make profit. they were on the same tier of work as shit shovelers, and they did plenty of that kind of manual work. but they turned to piracy when they could as well.

Ships need manual work no matter what. And the manual work in pirate settlements were done by slaves :)))
>Hickok was drawn to this ruffian lifestyle and headed west at age 18 as a fugitive from justice
Thanks for confirming my thread

>by slaves
aka beta wagecuck serf DNA

settlements need manual work no matter what too. texans had slaves by the way in case you forgot.
anyway this guy (argentine cowboy equivalent) slaved away building walls for a year amongst the lowest of the low and when he finally got his pay he lost it gambling. he chose that line of work because it was what naturally suited his class and environment and person as a cowboy/gaucho. was he a pathetic wagecuck serf? no, he was a renowned conquerer. because in the case of any of these types of people; cowboys, gauchos, pirates, they were all outlaw ruffians AS WELL AS shit shovelers. their reputation as badasses isn't even modern, the only difference is that back then, the reputation was tempered with fear.

Attached: Garcia_del_Molino-Quiroga.png (200x261, 105K)

What's your problem with ranches having employees?

>American flag posts some literally who mexican
checks out

>Early in his life, he became a problem child, and escaped from school
Aka he didnt shovel shit :))) or at least didnt want to, thats why he turned bandit or whatever the fuck he did.

I have a problem with employees in general but in this thread I have a problem with how cowshit shovelers in a ranch are associated with outlaw gunslingers.

Yes its true that the Hollywood versions of cowboys isn't the whole picture, nor was The West a "wild" one nearly as much as is shown in the films etc.

what's your problem anyway? why do you hate cowboys? let me rephrase, why do you give a fuck about them?

>nor was The West a "wild" one nearly as much as is shown in the films
yes I know, but that doesnt change anything from what I said.

>what's your problem anyway?
the existence of your DNA

I didn't try to change it, just a general comment

>texans had slaves
Extremely few did, to be more accurate

fair enough

Wild West was well established in literature before films, just saying. Even Hitler was a fan of Karl May novels.

>Karl May novels
winnetou?

>be greek
>get ass raped
>be actual slaves for 500 years
>be famous for economic incapacity

Yep he's literally why Hitler said Injuns are Honorary Aryans

>i dont like cowboys because modern american dna
t. some greek retard somewhere

america didnt even allow southern europeans as immigrants before 70s
american immigrants were purely from north-western european stock till the 70s

hating cowboys because of modern and progressive genetics makes absolutely zero sense lmao

I dont even mean it in racial terms. But I think you know that dont you?
Winnetou character is a mountainman no? Different from gunslinger but the same concept applies.

>The lurking serbshit found his tongue again after that particular post
You also know what Im talking about.

neither of us know what you're taking about

why do you feel the need to defend the cowshit shoveler so much then?