Why do socialists have such a blood lust? Are they evil?

>Capitalism is the epitome of freedom
OH NONONONONONONO LOOK AT THIS DOOOOD AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 1553703976550.jpg (3490x3124, 644K)

i have cocklust not bloodlust

You just want free cum you filthy commie

But the Nazis ain't socialists. They're fascists.

Attached: Unbelievable.jpg (362x346, 38K)

yes i want free cummies im not a commie though just a market socialist

>market socialist
Contradictory terms and nothing is free in any market

Attached: dd7.jpg (600x399, 329K)

>Contradictory terms
false
>and nothing is free in any market
i said market socialist not free market socialist

A вы нeгpoв линчyeтe?

Attached: PPtm21k.png (737x767, 567K)

Fukk consumerism then.

Based

>capitalism has caused more deaths than socialism.
Yes, all those capitalist gulags and starvation plans.

REDpilled

>nothing is free in any market
Actually, many things are free in all real markets. That's why there is such a thing as market failure, you ignoramus. E.g. the air is free, and therefore the market can't price pollution correctly without intervention. No wonder your country defaulted.

>pollution
Pollution caused by the market itself idiot.

yes concentration camps were invented by arch capitalist british. they also caused starvations in india that puts holodomor to shame, check out victorian holocaust.

You are a complete ignoramus without even a basic understanding of supply, demand, and market failure. This is literally economics 101 tier material that you are completely ignorant of. I doubt you even understand what a market is. Good god, the state of you.

they are socialists
combined ideology of nationalism and socialism
they had a german version of stalin's nationalistic, one country socialism

>socialists

Attached: giphy (5).gif (283x333, 745K)

Nonsense. Sure, they put boers in camps, but that's not a death camp.

they died there
it was a death camp

Nah. Even so, incomparable to actual socialist death camps.

i can see you know much about that stuff by your pollution post above

By that definition gulags weren't death camps either. People died there but they weren't supposed to, they just shouldn't have misbehaved :^)

and gulags were just work camps from where prisoners would be set free eventually so not death camps... your point?

duh. Brit apologists like to claim that it was just a peaceful relocation. It wasn't. Brits weren't as autistic and openly murderous as the Germans, they just let people die on their own, like they did to the indians, the irish and all their other victims.
Those camps were meant to break the boers and reduce their numbers. From a moral perspective it was a completely immoral campaign of genocide in the name of pure imperialism

Literal ignoramus. This is a basic graph that you will encounter in any basic economics course. Study it carefully.

Attached: Slide27.jpg (1687x1265, 199K)

This 2bqh

The gulags were definitely death camps. That was the point of them.

there were about 18 million gulag prisoners of whom about 1 million died. for a death camp that's not very efficient number. contrast that to british concentration camps that you say weren't death camps...one in four people died in them meaning they were much much worse places to be than gulags.

yes
that doesn't prove that markets don't fail on their own

Dude it wasn't real capitalism they just enslaved all those people and colonized the world for capital gain and profit but like, not real capitalism okay?