Is this an opinion you would agree with?

Why is it so hard to not fuck responsibly?
Just use protection or birth control or don't have sex if you can't afford the consequences

Yes.

Argument is that the fetus has no right to use someone's body against their will in the same way that people can't be forced to give up their bodies for others against their will as it is illegal.

This whole argument is retarded. The left tries to get everyone to ignore the fact that you are killing your own baby, a human being. Politicians argue over how many days, months, until it's a 'human'. It's a human being the second it starts developing and killing it on purpose is killing a baby

However, the right is retarded and wants people to have babies that are shit and it's heavily fueled by christcucks who adopt african niggerspawns and even want rape babies to be born. If you really decide to kill your baby go ahead, but don't act like you didn't kill a human being, killing your baby because you fucked someone you aren't comfortable with, or risked having a baby when you're financially insecure is something you'll have to live with if you decide that

I'll tell my conjoined twin that he doesn't have a right to live.

Attached: Nuremberg_chronicles_-_Male_Siamese_twins_(CCXVIIr).jpg (1350x1668, 730K)

Well said

the infant is not a party to what has transpired in their creation, they're there by the fact of biology, you can apply intent to a party without a concept of it

except that's not how the real world works
adults have the right to vote and drive
children have special protective measure in place
also, spreading your legs for raw cock IS consent

can *not apply

I bet a catholic wrote this.

I bet a faggot posted this.

I support abortion, not because I care about any dumb slut, but because I enjoy killing babies.

Attached: 1530253481563.jpg (334x506, 22K)

t. single catholic pro-lifer mom whose life was ruined by paying the toll and their backwards religion told them to continue making bad decisions at the tender age of 16

we'll decide the outcome on nietzschean principle

t.progressive ethics

How is it backwards to not kill a baby you’re pregnant with?

>>>>>>>>>>

Attached: pepeis.png (529x554, 59K)

WIth all of this projection you're doing you might as well change your name to imax

This wouldn't even be an issue if sex with women was limited to procreation while sex with women (male) was used for pleasure.

Attached: interested greek philosopher frog.png (624x434, 103K)

Cope.

>no argument
Epic

Yes. Late term abortions should be legal, and easily accessible. The damage associated with forcing someone who isn't ready to support a child, to care for a child, is far less "moral" than some stupid religious reasoning.

I can't take a post like this seriously and presume it's a troll reply

>we should just kill innocent babies because the parents are inconvenienced.
Do you have no moral compass at all?

Hey, what do you want me to say other than Abortion is a choice. Life is not important. Always keep out for #1. No amount of autistic screaming about dead babies will change this.

so you would murder someone else at the drop of a hat? sociopath

I have no issues with it in the slightest. So many people's lives get fucked by accidental pregnancies. It isn't fair for the kid, or for the parents. Termination is by far the best option

What’s not fair for the kid is murdering it in the womb. How can possibly say murder is the best option when there are other options?

Yes? The weak will always be at the mercy of the strong. Mercy is the privilege of the strong. You may not like it, but this is what peak society looks like.

Name one society that has thrived with this method you are describing.

if that's your attitude then the United States is not a country you want to live in

Based

creeping inhumanity I'm afraid