Bitcoin | 10 | 0 Ethereum | 10 | 1 Zilliqa | 6 | 10 -> validators, cheats with shards (x ETHs) Harmony | 0 | 0 -> Nothing tangible Chia | 0 | 0 -> Nothing tangible Kadena | 0 | 10 -> Quorum / Fabric Kadena | 10 | 2 -> Tendermint Thunder | 2 | 8-10 -> Accelerator (dpos) Oasis | 2 | 2 -> TEE & slow state Solana | 2 | 10 -> max dPoS I think he was very biased on ETH side, in theory it's very decentralized but in practice not so much (well not enough to give it a 10). I think he was hard on oasis, ZIL should be rated higher on decentralization imo (I think he didn't want to make ZIL look very attractive, he's ETH fanboy, even tho he admitted Zilliqa is the best overall platform currently on the market because ETH can't scale), Kadena (Tendermint) should be rated a little higher on scaling.
I agree he was very hard on some. which one do you think he was wrong about?
Matthew Rivera
I think ETH with state sharding is going to end the scalability debate.
Nathaniel Collins
>state sharding
ETH isn't even close to achive it, good luck waiting minimum 3 years.
Personally, i think another new innovative platform will come up with a solution to it
Wyatt Rivera
There are no shortcuts to implement this with the spec Ethereum wants to use and so far it looks to be far superior to anything else out there. I'd be more wary if a new innovative solution pops up and somehow circumvents all the research the Ethereum foundation has at the groundwork of sharding technology.
Bitcoin had a rollback and is ran by a corporation now. Go fuck yourself
Alexander Harris
I think he was a bit hard on Zilliqa considering they're the only ones with a public testnet trying to push sharding forward while eth has basically delivered little to nothing despite sharding being the future of crypto, unless eth finds a way to solve scalability it won't be able to solve the issues it's proposing to solve.
He's the one who caused holo run 3 months ago, he really liked it even tho it has its own disadvantages.
yep, i think ZIL deserves more than 6 on decentralization too
I agree that ETH isn't taking any shortcuts in their research, but do you really think that they have anything substantial atm? i know they're making progress but they even warned us it'll take longer than the community believe it'll take (2020 at the bare minimum, high chances it'll take longer)
Ethan Sullivan
This
Xavier Harris
Zil could be hyped up too, I'm not a programmer so I can't make much sense of much of their GitHub, but one thing is running a tesnet and a very different thing is running your own blockchain with malicious actors. Either way can you imagine if ZIL develops sharding before ETH on their own platform. wew lad
William Brown
They are still a good bit off, but my main point is that the competition doesn't have anything substantial either, at least not something that respects the decentralization or the security part that the Ethereum spec is trying to achieve. People are not going to switch off the Ethereum platform, at least not in the long term. I can see some companies using ZIL in the meantime, but even if it takes 2 years developers are just going to sit it out if nothing comes out that just instantly fixes all the problems.
I've been keeping my eyes on Taraxa a bit since it's essentially a smart contract fork of Nano, which might work or any of the other DAG smart contracts, but even here you're sacrificing a lot of security that people don't want to part with like the attack vectors that Nano is exposed to with penny spam attacks etc.
I just can't see a traditional blockchain project to overtake what ETH has in terms of research, developer support and work done (even if it's not much), the whole pipeline is there, which isn't something you could say about other projects.
Levi Rodriguez
((((((((((((You))))))))))))
Blake Green
what braindead idiot created this bullshit list, they are fucking ignorant and pathetically stupid. op you are gay. why did you come here from reddit you stupid cunt?
