ALL DOWNHILL FROM HERE

ALL DOWNHILL FROM HERE

Attached: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAA.png (1920x1080, 300K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/2017/03/10/business/dealbook/winkelvoss-brothers-bid-to-create-a-bitcoin-etf-is-rejected.html
sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbzx-2016-30/batsbzx201630-20.pdf
cnbc.com/2018/07/26/winklevoss-twins-bitcoin-etf-rejected-by-sec.html
twitter.com/jchervinsky/status/1021795224958455810
sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1579346/000119312516786685/d302498ds1a.htm
sec.gov/rules/sro/cboebzx/2018/34-83520.pdf
google.com.mx/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/07/26/winklevoss-twins-bitcoin-etf-rejected-by-sec.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Here's to you Nicola and Bart

SEC has always rejected ETFs by the Winkles. This is not surprising. The real one is the CBOE ETF. Get with the times OP. Shit tier FUD.

Attached: 9879849847.jpg (517x307, 69K)

rejecting ETF's is similar to attempting to block out sun

Attached: 1530738108283.png (779x534, 794K)

>Discord
>Chrome
>Spotify
>Steam

kek found the zoomer s,0yboy

Am I the only one that thinks that anyone buying a bitcoin ETF, instead of the bitcoins themselves is a retard? I'm not saying this is a bad thing, a big rush of retard money would be great, but if I'm buying a commodity, I want access to it.

Tethered at $8,300 once I saw volume going nuts.

>t. absolute brainlet

Millionaires and billionaires are too busy to learn about private keys and cold storage. They rather have regulated experts take care of that.

Nah, you're retarded.

fake

bullish

what does this have to do with a BTC ETF being denied?
CBOES ETF won't be decided on until 2019 SEC has already said that.

you wish

nobody expected these etfs to get approved.
It's all about the solidx etf with cboe. Talk about dumb money.

>nobody expected these etfs to get approved.
i hope as fuck they never get approved. etfs and other derivatives suppress price.

S

wrong, try aug 10 nigger faggit

You are fucking retarded. The solidx etf literally buys and sells otc and from the market.
Kys

>Repost the non korean FUD from one year ago as breaking news

Attached: 1527364742163.jpg (768x605, 77K)

i just market sold at 8075 and now it's back up to 8119 REEEEEEEE

Blatant manufactured FUD. Other ETF gets approved next month and everybody who sold this shit gets caught with their pants down. Textbook fakeout.

dont fall for the fud pajeet

And bitcoin dumps. We had a nice small bullrun guys, time for a healthy correction.

Attached: fae.jpg (600x630, 21K)

ETF was rejected though

Priced in

>nytimes.com/2017/03/10/business/dealbook/winkelvoss-brothers-bid-to-create-a-bitcoin-etf-is-rejected.html


Yeah, back in fucking march faggot.

This isn't the one everyone hyping about

...

can you guys dump it down to 8010 so I can make .002 btc by selling at 8075

based this is when thelast bull started

agreed fucking boomers need to stay the fuck out of crypto!

Wrong ETF dipshit

YES SPREAD THIS FUD

if we have some panic selling from this'd it'd be a good chance to buy before the real ETF comes in

reminder that the Stolfi Doctrine is still in full power: sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbzx-2016-30/batsbzx201630-20.pdf
hundreds of comments from Rakeesh and co. in favor of the etf will not suffice to alter it

CNBC strikes again. Wow I shouldn't be surprised but just wow. This network is scummy as fuck.
>This is not the ETF we're excited about
>This is old news
>This level of FUD confirms the real ETF is a guarantee

>dumping because of this shit

this fucking market

Remember boys, these fuckers ran a segment on how to short Bitcoin at 6k. Just opened 10k more in longs.

>Yeah, back in fucking march faggot.
No, they resubmitted after making changes and were rejected again!

Not entirely. With bitcoin being a fixed supply. If 1 etf=50 bitcoins and over 420,000 ETF were sold some fuckery did happen. Unlike gold where no one actually knows how much exists bitcoin is harder to do fuckery with.

You are fucking retarded. Stop posting.

Yah that will get me to comply. What is actually wrong with what I said. You cant have more derivatives or etfs that equal more than the actual amount of bitcoin that exists.

It's not though, the ETF doesn't have to reply in 45 days.

if you guys are here to make money you should start a new thread to compare the content of the now rejected Winkelvoss proposal to the CBOE one.

You retards this isn't old news this happened today
>cnbc.com/2018/07/26/winklevoss-twins-bitcoin-etf-rejected-by-sec.html
this whole thread wreaks of COPE

Doesn't matter. In 10 mins when people realize this is fakenews shorts are going to shoot us up to 8.3k. Buy buy buy.

>Reads the article
>CNBC talks about the old shit
>Nothing actually happened today, no one was rejected
>BTC crashes either way

Thanks CNBC, thankfully I got my short in at 8240.

How? The proposals aren't public.

Quoted from the article
>Last year, the SEC rejected an application for the "Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust" but in June, the group submitted a proposed rule change with the commission.
It's like you guys read the first paragraph and skip everything else, weird. They literally tried to appease the SEC but still got denied *Thinking*

have fun holding bags faggot I sold and will rebuy at the bottom

THIS IS THE ONE WE ARE COUNTING ON GETTING APPROVED FAGGOTS. BEARS GET WRECKED NOW

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-26 at 2.39.36 PM.png (547x63, 19K)

YOU BETTER BE READY TO WAIT UNTIL 2019 PAJEET

*ALSO TO NOTE*
winklevoss twins ETF got denied because there isn't enough market oversight. WHAT IS CBOE DOING THATS GOING TO CHANGE THIS?CBOE will get rejected as well august 16th or 2019 like i keep saying

lol cope harder. Do you even read? Just lol that they purposely threw in a Warren Buffett ad in the article too. Just wow.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-26 at 2.43.49 PM.png (592x499, 131K)

No i just read more then the average Jow Forumslet
twitter.com/jchervinsky/status/1021795224958455810

Attached: wow.png (1920x1080, 552K)

Attached: wow2.png (1920x1080, 563K)

They are public.
Winkelvoss filling: sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1579346/000119312516786685/d302498ds1a.htm
VanEck-SolidX filling: sec.gov/rules/sro/cboebzx/2018/34-83520.pdf

From the PDF linked in the Bloomberg article (that's dated with today's date):
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 30, 2016, Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (“BZX”) filed a proposed rule change with
the Commission, seeking to list and trade shares of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust.
1 The
Commission, acting through authority delegated to the Division of Trading and Markets,2
disapproved the proposed rule change on March 10, 2017,
3 and BZX then filed a timely petition
seeking Commission review of the disapproval by delegated authority.
4 The Commission granted
BZX’s Petition for Review, seeking public comments in support of or in opposition to the March Disapproval Order.
5 Today’s order sets aside the March Disapproval Order, and, for the reasons
discussed below, disapproves BZX’s proposed rule change.

Wtf? Could this actually be a sham article to generate fud?

Attached: reading.png (1920x1080, 519K)

Okay so what? Even if that scenario does happen this article is pure manufactured FUD by a national news network. The ETF is still coming dumb ass.

google.com.mx/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/07/26/winklevoss-twins-bitcoin-etf-rejected-by-sec.html

Bulls btfo

why can't anyone tell me how this is fud? they got rejected TODAY! 2017 they got their TRUST rejected not their ETF

Because the etf we are counting on getting approved is not the one referenced in the article. This fakenews was calculated. The whole article is a fake and it was pushed out purposely the day that futures for the month close.

ANOTHER FUCKING SHOAH

FUCK THESE KIKE COLLABORATOR TWINS

I will dollar cost average down buying this dip if it goes any lower

I don't know. The pdf makes it seem like it was rejected today. It's 92 pages. Link to it on a Bloomberg article about this.

so a decision prob in sept?

what does your opinion have to do with anything so᠌yboy

I didn't realize my opinion was attached to the wilklevoss bitcoin ETF being rejected after 0 extensions

We are counting specifically on the VanEck SolidX one because of the security they are guaranteeing to investors. The headline of this CNBC article is referencing an ETF that no one gives a shit about.

SHUT THE FUCK UP

THIS IS A FUCKING WINKLEVOSS HATE THREAD, HATE THESE TWO FUCKING KIKE TWINS NOT THAT DUMB RANDOM

Yes. I shouldn't be shocked but it's disgusting to see a large network like CNBC do this.

Hasn't that been delayed until 2019?

>Large network is just a euphemism for Jews.
Say exactly what it is nigger, stop being shabos goy

No. Unless there is a delay the SEC need to respond in August .

ctrl-f manipulate
Wink
>11 found
CBOE
>37 found

See my post here.

>Here's to you Nicola and Bart
WHY DID YOU POST THAT? WHY THE FUCK DID YOU POST THAT? WHO ARE YOU? FUCK OFF OUT OF MY LIFE

Politicians are a bunch of lazy cocksuckers. Only place where they can get paid outrageous sums of money, best healthcare on earth for free and work "when they feel like getting around to it".

Bump so other anons can be informed. Read my posts. Do not fall for this FUD. Stay safe anons.

Its dumping because of the future closes

see my post here.

i've already debunked what you've had to say this isn't fud this is the winklevosses getting btfo
unless CBOE can somehow provide more "security" or "supervision" they are doomed to the same fate as the winklevosses. That twitter thread is very telling and i believe it will be the measure of what happens to the CBOE ETF's Seen here

The CNBC article is manufactured fud. The fact that there is a Warren Buffet ad placed right before they briefly discuss the VanEck SolidX ETF (and state that it has not been denied) should be a sign for you. I encourage you to re read the article.

ETF's for bitcoin have been rejected over the years. The market has reacted favorably specifically for VanEck and SolidX ETF for the reasons I've already stated. Stay safe.

I encourage you to eat a dick and get adblocker. you haven't refuted the fact that just because it's not the winklevoss twins that somehow CBOE and w/e companies are going in with them are going to make the market more supervised. if you really believe that the government wants to legitimize crypto this early you are a retard.

i sure hope it doesn't get approved.

>gets his news from CNBC
YNGMI

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-26 at 3.37.53 PM.png (582x743, 157K)

Last bump for other anons to be informed. I love this place. Read my posts. Doing what I can to help you guys.

(((SEC))) says market manipulated so how the fuck does anyone fix that.

If that's the reason they rejected then what chance is there for the other ETF's getting approval?

slim to none

Thanks for helping me try and explain what "unsupervised" means to the SEC. The next decision WILL be delayed and you wont see a decision until 2019