I want a union with England. The East Coast is quintessentially European and we have been here from medieval times

How about Philadelphia

Attached: ElfrethPanorama2.jpg (1565x883, 280K)

This. We were proud Englishmen but we hated the British Crown and the British Empire. Just like how Han Chinese settlers in Taiwan hate communist China and Mao

shithole, piss off

I hope you mean that your mum died and he made a mistake in his depressed state, as opposed to you being a hapa goblino

>Goblono
rude. I'm a mixed-race Anglo American

>americans
>in any way european
made me chuckle

All you NEers are scum.

>UK this close to americas

Op would have made a better god than god himself

Based, love England

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

Based and Anglopilled

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

you're next, fren

Just delcare independence.. Only a cuck would want to join a new country.

Next? Please state your case clearer

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

The British empire served the royalty and nobility only they exploited the english people let alone people who were nowhere near the crowns residence.

>attempting to mock superior nations
how quaint

>those dixie states that would slaughter any Brit trying to claim authority ove the bright sunny south

>medieval times.
I mean we haven't really
failed settlements include the French Charlesfort (1562) in South Carolina and Roanoke (1585)
continued habitation extends from the settling of Jamestown (1607)
I like brits and wouldn't mind seeing closer political ties but our governmental structure is quite different

my ancestors arrived in 1650, that's like 200 years before germany existed

I recommend the dissolution of the British nation and resurrecting an independent England with the 13 colonies as countries of England.

in 1660 13 colonies had 75,058 population.

in 1670 111,935

in 1690 210,372 that's huge.

O czym pierdolisz jebany anglo śmieciu?

Nie gadam po angielsu i nie rozumiem cię.

>I want a union with England. The East Coast is quintessentially European and we have been here from medieval times.

>We are not Amerimutts like Cali and Texas

Attached: 45966638-CAB8-4967-95BD-C414566D2320.png (1217x1015, 708K)

1730 629,445

population of britain in 1730 The population of the UK exceeds 10 million for the first time.

I'm quite aware of the population growth rate from high birthrates and immigration which I'm not denying but north America was not settled during the medieval era (not including Greenland and Norse in Newfoundland)

>Unironically wanting Westminster to rule over you

Attached: 1550173509242.jpg (955x960, 93K)

The South was the most loyalist portion of the colonies to rebel, recieved British material support during the civil war, preserved more features of British English than any other Americans, and the white population is mostly Scots-Irish or English ethnically.

What exactly is your reason for thinking this?

>Westminister

no. I want an ENGLISH king to rule directly. Not your current Germanoid monarch

Attached: 800px-Athelstan.jpg (800x1127, 346K)

All of the "USA" is English clay.

Attached: 1555471659993.jpg (334x334, 88K)

in 1690 kings, dukes, and feudal system existed in europe, the same in 1730

the south received no cultural development and were created without civilization.

>17th century
>medieval

>17th century
>renaissance
a century too late

>17th century
>enlightenment
a century too early

Why can't Americans learn proper history?

The South is the only region of the United States that even has a culture.

Most of England's best died in the World Wars or moved somewhere else. Why would anyone want anything to do with us today?

>The South was the most loyalist portion of the colonies to rebel
No it wasn't
>recieved British material support during the civil war
Not as much as the north who most Brits preferred
>preserved more features of British English than any other Americans
You just made that up based on nonsense that southerners claim snd actual linguists and historians outside the US south laugh at
>the white population is mostly Scots-Irish or English ethnically.
Almost as much as places like Maine or Utah
>What exactly is your reason for thinking this
Education

That's absolutely not how you define "medieval", and feudalism was very much dead in Western Europe by the 1600's.
English serfs were freed in 1574.

Sorry vut you'd need to drop all of these but Maine, Vermont, and Massachusetts. And even then you'd need to drop Boston, and anyone who is more than 2 generations in, or black. That leaves few left.

There weren't rail roads and industry therefore part of the same cultural development of the renaiscance and rebirth of pagan culture and thinking as opposed to christian dogma and theology.

imagine believing that
>rebirth of pagan culture
my fucking sides

1. Yes it was
2. Nobody cares what illiterate 19th century factory workers thought about a foreign war.
3. That is something linguists agree on. Southern English was traditionally rhotic and spoken from the mouth rather than the throat, as is British English.
4. Never claimed other states weren't.
5. You don't know dick about what you're talking about.

>We are not Amerimutts like Cali and Texas

Attached: 1508603468233.png (820x1020, 377K)

You’re embarrassing us worse please fucking stop and go jerk off to the queen or whatever it is you do

I thought a great motivator of the American Revolution was the ban of slavery on the British Isles by the British parliament, which was feared would be extended to the colonies. Why would the south be particularly loyalist in that case?

before steam power = renaissance where reality and natural philosophy plays a larger role than theology and fantasy thought.

the indo-european worldview survives in America

The intellectual basis of the Renaissance was its version of humanism, derived from the concept of Roman Humanitas and the rediscovery of classical Greek philosophy, such as that of Protagoras, who said that "Man is the measure of all things."

>le renaissance was christian
the renaissance was opposed to christianity and any thought or phiolosophy that came from the bible, MAN was the measure of all things not the bible or theology.

what the actual fuck are you babbling on about?
it's so readily apparent you've never cracked open a book on the subject, or any subject really

Feudalism was very much alive in Europe until WWI. The emancipation of the serfs in various countries was part of the long and slow decline of feudalism, for example. The South became fairly medieval and feudal thanks in part to how the plantations worked.

I assume he means vikings and then other fisherman in Newfoundland, the first full English claim to eastern North America was in 1497 so if you count medieval as 5th-15th centuries then eastern North America just makes the cut. That said, it was in Canada, not America, and there wasn't a permanent English colony until later.

To be more explicit, I see growing on the horizon the greater peril than Germany or Japan ever were; and if the present hostilities do not actually merge into a war with our terrible enemy, America, it will remain for those of us who have the necessary knowledge and insight to do what we can where we can to help Britain be victorious again in her next crisis.
—Enoch Powell

I laughed at you, I couldn't be less angry
Now I'm laughing again

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_tree_of_English_and_British_monarchs

Attached: gallimimus meets a t-rex.jpg (1024x622, 326K)

I don't think there's such a thing as "the Indo-European worldview"

Imagine believing that. Russia and the East were very feudal until quite late, but absolutely not the Hanseatic countries, nor the colonial powers (France, England, Portugal, Spain and the Netherlands)

because you have an arabic world view, no clue why you're not in MENA general.

You're embarrassing to America

researchgate.net/publication/284922847_On_the_Indo-European_worldview

Weltenshaung.

Are you a Basqoid subhuman

Feudalism ended in France with the French Revolution, Quebec didn't completely kill off feudalism until the late 20th century.

you're embarrassing to morocco by claiming to be white.

>when you hate "commonwealth" immigration to Britain but are fine with Canadians, kiwis, and Aussies, immigrating in but it's totally not racist or anything

Attached: politics-european-referendum-national-referendum-on-the-common-market-enoch-powell-london-390x285.jp (390x285, 25K)

this.

The French revolution ended absolutism, not feudalism, which was already dead.
>Quebec was feudal until the late 20th century
Most retarded thing I've ever read. Just because feudal institutions remain doesn't mean the country is feudal in itself. Japan has an emperor, is it a feudal country? Is Sweden? Are the Netherlands? Is Spain, or the UK, or Belgium? Denmark, Norway? They all have a monarchy with roots in feudal Europe.

Monarchy does not make feudalism. The French still had a landed nobility class that collected rents from lands that they owned. Absentee landlords are often considered one of the driving factors in the French Revolution for the more rural people. The UK could still be considered feudal due to the royal family, in theory, owning most of the land in Britain with rents being one of their major sources of income.

He's not entirely wrong, Québec had the seigneurial system until the mid 19th century which was a type of fuedalism. Prince Edward Island had a somewhat similar system too

That ended in 1760, revenue from Crown estates was passed from the Crown to the treasury. In 2012 they passed a law granting 25% of revenues to the institution of the Crown (not the Monarch directly). Prior to that it was the dicennial civil list

That doesn't make it feudal. There were vestiges of the feudal era, and there still are, but the northern part of North America was mercantilist, and later capitalist/industrial during colonisation. Not feudal.

>The UK could still be considered feudal
just no

You are right, except in Québec which was predominantly seigneurial, which isn't a vestige of late fuedalism, it's just straight up fuedalism. It was mostly an anomaly though, as you said most of colonial North America was economically mercantile/capitalist/industrialist, even charter or Crown colonies weren't really fuedal, just Québec. CZivics, language, aristocracy, economy, and religion, were too intertwined there and Britain didn't want to rock the boat too much so some archaic systems persisted long after they died everywhere else.

My mistake. Though as I said, in theory, and it does seem more like a formality since it is all held on behalf of the monarch.

I think you're taking my saying that the South was fairly feudal as an absolute where everything was 1:1. It wasn't. The South shared many aspects with feudalism and had many other aspects that were not feudal at all. New England wasn't feudal at all, but it was also settled from a different part of the UK than the South was. Part of the reason that the US is so different from Europe is that feudalism never really took hold here.

Any reason you didn't dispute the Spanon's rebuttal about the fact that the idea that we could still be considered feudal is fucking retarded?

>Quebec didn't completely kill off feudalism until the late 20th century.
roflmao what

New York is a hive of goblins so I don't know what your talking about

Because he didn't present an argument.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seigneurial_system_of_New_France#Final_steps_(1936–1970)

I don't need to present an argument, the absurd and extraordinary claim that the UK is still feudal was spouted by you. The burden of proof is on you.

>Because he didn't present an argument.

Attached: 154567736734.jpg (400x300, 32K)

The seigneurial system was formally abolished in 1854

It's not really taught in America because it goes against the American founding narrative. At the same time King George III was being called a greedy tyrant in colonies he was giving up much of his income and power to the state on the condition that they give him only enough to live like a King.

that's America proper, nothing but a barbaric version of Canada

>the crown still owns lands and collects rents while maintaining some governmental power even if there's veils in the way to make it less transparent
>wow this is so unlike feudalism
You're just fucking retards.

The last rents were collected in the 1970s. Seems like that's the real date.

Makes sense. The crown still indirectly controls those lands since, again in theory, the British monarch does have quite a bit of power over the state.

>Owning property is feudalism
Absolute fucking brainlet.

It's like you're reading every other word. The part that makes it feudalism is that they are collecting rents and acting as nobility. They should be fulfilling other obligations to the people but they aren't.

>The East Coast is quintessentially European

The only "white people" on the East Coast are Irish, Italian and Jewish. So, a bunch of potato niggers who are responsible for white trash being a thing, a bunch of greasy wops who are Arab rapebabies, and a bunch of kikes who are the enemy of white people.

Plus there's a lot of spics on the East Coast too, from Puerto Rico and Cuba.

Be gone, Mutt, you will never be Anglo no matter how desperately you claim to be.

>We are not Amerimutts like Cali and Texas

Sure, whatever you say, Seamus Luis DiShekelberg.

Attached: mutt.png (1440x747, 369K)

>We are not Amerimutts like Cali and Texas
Are you sure about that?

Attached: 1531597847006.png (3000x6500, 3.07M)

The UK actually does have an island that still had fuedalism. Sark island, part of the balliwack of Guernsey.

>we have been here from medieval times.
Are you high or just retarded?

*Has

>It's like you're reading every other word.
No, unfortuntely for both of us, I am reading the shit you're posting, although I wish I wasn't.
>again in theory, the British monarch does have quite a bit of power over the state.
When you're saying shit like this, all you're doing is showing how little you know about what it is that you're talking about.

See
Technically thd lands of eastern North America were claimed for the British Crown (by an Italian) in 1497 and technically 1497 is late medieval. It's a bullshit stretch to pretend that has anything to do with the U.S. Atlantic states now though.

WTF DELETE THIS AZTELAN WAS ALWAYS MEXICAN

When a system is phased out legally it takes many decades or even centuries, because it’s not violently removed or made illegal with the stroke of a pen or sword
Canada got its full, unconditional independence from the UK in 1982 but has been functioning as a sovereign country since 1931 and as an independent country since 1867. It’s not like Canada was a British colony until 1982 because there were legal vestiges of such

Come to the south and ask anyone if they feel british and would advocate for a political union with Britain.

The south is the most 1776 BABY it gets

We still don't know if we have full constitutional autonomy from the UK thanks to HRH Prince George Cambridge. It's a minor constitutional crisis