Edition: best Emma
/brit/
Iest Ind itt
innit but that's all that was left
recycle this one after
me? for lunch? yes it'll be salmon sandwich, pistachio éclair and iced tea
aah yeah the old evening tesco route
daily reminder: If your boomer parents didn't get some considerable assets under their belts between 1960 and 2000 it's over for you and every subsequent generation of your family. thanks for playing x
whats your tranny name?
heather
have an email address set up for when I hit 30 and become a hon
So have you got the guts?
Been wondering if your heart's still open and
if so I wanna know what time it shuts
Simmer down and pucker up
I'm sorry to interrupt it's just I'm constantly
on the cusp of trying to kiss you
I don't know if you feel the same as I do
But we could be together, if you wanted to
If this feeling flows both ways
(Sad to see you go)
Was sorta hoping that you'd stay
(Baby we both know)
That the nights were mainly made for saying
things that you can't say tomorrow day
feel a bit bad for the delivery lad bringing me my stuff because parking round here is a bloody nightmare
half the time he just plonks the van in the road and gets a move on
don't recognise this but i bet it's either libertines or arctic monkeys
the drivers have an easy job, they have a cheeky hour break between afternoon deliveries and evening
ahahaha i googled it and i was right it's arctic monkeys
@tismomick
>Wrong
not wrong.
inherent things must be permanent, if they weren't they would be subject to change.
how can an inherent thing change? if an inherent thing changes it would not be an inherent thing, it would be something else. eg if the idea of a table changed, the idea would be of a chair or something else not of a table.
next an inherent thing must be able to be defined/understood as independent of all other things. if an inherent thing has other things in its definition, then other things also have other things in their definitions and all inherent things will be just a mush of a regress of different definitions and things would not be able to be sensibly distinguished from each other. for example if a table is defined as the result of a carpenter and wood, wood would need to be defined as the result of a tree and etc etc etc - until you cannot make sense of anything by their definitions and this is a big problem for an 'inherent thing'.
this includes inherent existence and also inherent inexistence. in fact i don't say that objectivity objectively doesn't exist because it would require objectivity to exist to support its nonexistence (nonsense).
notre dame caught fire because they were forced to do affirmative action hires for the builders so they got sub par workers
quite fancy a succulent chinese meal
if it changes its not inherent but if it has never observably changed then we have no reason to believe it should other so until then its inherent
simple as, virgin
>succulent chinese meal
You mean bones with potatoes and MSG
DID YOU THREATEN TO OVERRULE HIM?
DID YOU THREATEN TO OVERRULE HIM?
DID YOU THREATEN TO OVERRULE HIM?
DID YOU THREATEN TO OVERRULE HIM?
DID YOU THREATEN TO OVERRULE HIM?
no i mean a succulent internet meme
youtube.com
singing a song about milk
I support: man u, liverpool, chelsea, man city, barca, real madrid, juve, bayern and Dortmund
problem?
hungover and hungry
what food should I get lads?
porridge and coffee gang
porridge and coffee gang
porridge and coffee gang
mac and cheese
Not arsed
*quotes jurrasic park*
so yes mathematics and logic are practically fine to construct arguments off because they are reliable. but they are not essential nor are they objective/inherent because we cannot guarantee against their change.
let me show you what the problem of thinking of mathematics as an inherent essence is. mathematics comes into and out of reality whenever things partaking of it arise?
so when my mind starts trying to do a sum, mathematics inserts itself into my brain and attaches to the numbers my mind forms - but before that there was no mathematics?
How can a permanent unchanging thing come in and out of reality? does that have a cause? is it my mind? am i the creator of the eternal maths?
>justeat wont deliver for another hour
corrrrrrrr pengalicioussss
Long weekend
I honestly don't get how someone, for example, can support a top team like Barca, but then hate another top team like Real - or vice versa. Imagine the amount of mental gymnastics one hast to induce.
yeah after friday prayer you mong
stop redditspacing and I might read your next post if I'm arsed
Oh I see
quite the elegant move, Australia
Very peng train indeed
>Please checkout by 13:34
waheey I'm in this picture
imagine that smashing into your bollocks at 130mph
It's Passover lads
Say something nice about Jews
just want to wake up as my character in my fallout game
so yes mathematics and logic are practically fine to construct arguments off because they are reliable. but they are not essential nor are they objective/inherent because we cannot guarantee against their change. let me show you what the problem of thinking of mathematics as an inherent essence is. mathematics comes into and out of reality whenever things partaking of it arise? so when my mind starts trying to do a sum, mathematics inserts itself into my brain and attaches to the numbers my mind forms - but before that there was no mathematics? How can a permanent unchanging thing come in and out of reality? does that have a cause? is it my mind? am i the creator of the eternal maths?
mad how he recovered from this and went on to become leader
anyone here like JAV?
Interesting lack of children itt, given the state of the rest of Jow Forums
dave? you there?
mr toilhmed just texted me saying 'r we a bank? wer r u?'
Nu match, seems wholesome
maths is a persistent objective reality
when you calculate using mathematical logic you're using the same maths used by all mathematicians, past, present, and future
I noticed uncensored JAV have a different type of japanese looking women compared to censored. Censored JAV seem to have full on native japanese women, like they can barely see out of their eyes they're so squinty. Bu censored have shaved women who are more whorish
all women should be arrested and then forcibly put into tights and released on probation
Love me some peng trains
evil bastards celebrate the death of our lord and saviour
imagine being the first guy to see a banana and being like
ooh I'll eat that
qt
PENG
thread didn't show up for some reason in the filtered threads list
could unfilter the south african gimp but i dont want to
need to see her HAMASSED
eating a lidl pretzel
what? The maths was always there whether you thought of it in your mind or not.Just because you are not aware of something does not mean it does not exist
Not sure why girls love wearing tights on Easter weekend.
the peng tings
youtube.com
If jeepers was cuxifyed today.
Kill the chicken burn the egg
i hate JAVs like this one because i never know where to look
I'd make her gaza strip
I'd colonise her west bank!
I'd send rockets into her territory
I'd claim her land for my people!
I'd smash that for seven days
I'd make sure the mother was Jewish alright
Eden Chanel is pretty peng name, ngl (2bqh).
it's really just too much, not at all a fan of threesomes-and-up
they looked nothing like they do now
most foods have been selectively bred to give a high yield of tasty, convenient food
some brainiac once said that if they could go back in time to roman days or whenever and take back technology to blow their minds, they'd take a bag of seeds
pic related is (i think) what bananas looked like when they were discovered
all womyn shuld be arresded : DDD
swag
youtube.com
oli sykes vocals have improved massively
actually better than 2013 shadow moses Reading renaissance Oli
objective things require unchangeability, permanence and to be defined in isolation of all things. no thing can logically fit this definition and it becomes agpparent when you start to deconstruct what universe where objective concepts come in and out of existence would look like, that it is clearly not tenable.
take motion, is motion a persistent objective reality? all things that move are doing the same as all other things that moved (save for speed and direction) - but if they were imbued with an inherent objective reality of motion they would be carrying motion along with them as they move and hence motion would need motion (or numbers carrying maths and maths would need the maths of maths to emanate) - which is a meaningless regress.
A second problem when does motion start and stop? how can a permanent, unchanging thing stop and start being the character of a thing? when does a thing technically start moving? when does it technically stop? is it the same thing?
Mathematics at its core, like motion, is a posteriori descriptive characteristic we use to describe the phenomena we perceive. it is reliable because it describes these phenomena (including mental phenomena and feelings etc) with regularity, but it cannot stand apart as an inherent ideal because that defies logic (another one of our useful descriptors for phenomena)
I am not denying that subjective things can be for all intents and purposes unchanging (but we can never guarantee that they will not change).
why is the nazi obsessed yank posting jew women
i read that one strategy the jidf use to get sympathy for israel is to post hot idf babes
looks like it was true
chebs
The goal GF.
How do you know he's a Nazi? Never seen a Nazi do something like this before.
I'd show the romans fortnite
see
lol
once the yank is done posting his IDF girls he'll start posting the Brexit girls then maybe that trap he posts..
what a pathetic whelp
>Mboko, ‘tismo and Jow Forumsizen
An argument between these three would be priceless
Danger - Lijadu Sisters
need her number STAT
these are all inventions of trinity.
I starting to find a lot of inconsistences in the Holocaust. It seems as though the stories, and the facts of what happened keep getting added to it as time goes on and the survivors die out. Recently, feminist writers and historians are claiming SS guards raped and sexually assaulted jewish women before going into the gas chamber. But this wouldnt be the case by this stage the physical appearance of the women made them untouchable, on the verge of starvation, riddled with disease and viruses.
this didn't happen