I have studied the whitepaper for hundreds of crypto projects and have come to the conclusion that HOLOCHAIN will...

mai aspect is that it doesn't have global consensus whilst also eliminating the potential problems that you can get without global consensus. This technically makes it infinitely scalable. There's a lot more to it, but I cba to go into details now.

kek. but i think thats unironically a possibility. first of all, the boomer team holds 25%+ of total token supply. fuck that shit. on top of that the dynamic supply model and general uncertainity about adoption are further red flags. huge gamble in my opinion.

i'll play it safe for now with NKN and Rchain.

Can someone remind me when is mainnet coming out? Q3?

Tru senpai we goin 2 da moon

Attached: 1532337100215.jpg (767x767, 206K)

Pls moon so I can buy a ps4

nope, this market isn't rigged at all.

bought in when it was at 3sats
feels good to be alive

Attached: 1532627486157.jpg (640x633, 42K)

October or near then.

How the fuck is not having consensus a good thing?

Massively more scaleable. You can have working distributed systems without global consensus.

Scalability of a system without consensus leads to upscaling of the negative effect of lacking consensus. I repeat, how the fuck is not having consensus a good thing?

How? :(

Attached: 1529577155585.jpg (381x349, 41K)

WHERE IS THE VOLUMEEEEE

Attached: 1498440151414.png (225x224, 78K)

Don’t bother asking actual technical questions. .01% of crypto holders understand the fundamentals of the projects they’ve invested in. Don’t worry hologoys, your “not-a-crypto-or-blochchain” coin is going straight to the moon in the crypto market. Oh....wait....

say what you want, but this is exactly why i bought into holo. 99.9% of crypto investors are only interested in surface level details. holo is different in a way that is going to wow the market like iota did. idgaf if it ever gains adoption. this shit is going to pump hard like tron when we go bull.

whithout consensus and one ledger it's totally useless. blockchain was about censorship resistance, cutting out banks and very important public auditability of transactions.

holochain is actually a step back technologically. fuck scalability issues, blockchain will scale sooner or later.

even the founding devs admitted holo has only a small chance to moon. it's not a fixed supply crypto and not designed to increase in value that much, they try to have a stable currency. good lord, did you all fall for the binance pajeets?

have you learned nothing about crypto yet? follow dumb money and you'll make it.

>Literally a project founded by an occupy wall street lunatic who wants to overthrow the government and thinks he's going to re-invent the entire world, but has zero record of doing anything of remote value on this planet
Good luck with your actual shitcoin. I'm sure Joe Shmo used to live on the street guy is a force to be reckoned with and will BTFO every major corporation, bank, and government in the world.

It was $0.0003 on ForkDelta. There's where a lot of us bought in, lol.

ICO was $0.0001.

are you retarded or you don't know how to read? I said it doesn't have GLOBAL consensus. Where the fuck does it say it doesn't have consensus? Read a fucking technical paper before sperging out like a dipshit.
Here, I'll even spoonfeed you:
medium.com/holochain/hashgraph-vs-holochain-eb38d7dc1f8a

>inb4 "neet debunks holochain 5 minutes after reading an article"

local consensus is fucking retarded. how are you supposed to audit transactions on the "chain" for example if everyone owns just a fraction of the total ledger. totally inefficient. almost all real world use-cases of blockchain depend on global consensus. have fun bagholding.

>"neet debunks holochain 5 minutes after reading an article"
you faggots really show up like clockwork

Attached: 123214241512.png (200x200, 91K)

It doesn't need it because its agent-centric and not data-centric like blockchain. Blockchain has a lot of different perspectives that need to come to an agreement, Holo has 1 universal perspective and so it doesn't need consensus, there's never an actuall argument.

>inb4 "pathetic pump and dump pajeet tries to save his shitcoin investment from crashing even further"

the agent-centric design defeats the whole purpose of having a blockchain in the first place. when will you guys understand this. go back and read about the issues blockchains try to solve.

Attached: HOLODUMP.jpg (628x504, 94K)

Wow, thanks for the spoonfeeding, you folks really are alot more friendly than the Skycoin community.

Nice, but holo isn't blockchain

This is reassuring. Its like, centralized, but you use different words to describe it?

No its not centralized at all. Its Agent-centric, its probably one of the most decentralized architectures out there.

>defeats the purpose of blockchain
Exactly

I read your little article. Holochain is apparently based on the assumption that 99.9% of interactions will be harmonious, something that does not square with uncontroversial historical observations. Human history is paved with blood soaked earth, they are and always have been fiercely adversarial. The Holochain soft consensus will lead to a hellish entropic morass, with it follows destructive phenomenon, scaling, scaling...

holochain still competes will blockchain, no matter if the technology is a little different. your argument is fucking brainlet tier.

then read about the role of holo foundation. they control who gets paid for hosting through their reserve account. i call that semi-centralized.

holochain is a less useful data structure than blockchain in case you didn't get it by now.

How do you find out about brand new projects so you can get in on ground level?

blog.openai.com/ai-and-compute/

Why we need to unlock as much compute as we can. IoT and AI will just network hop and get resources as they need and Holo is going to be perfect for that. Please read this if you want to understand why we need compute networks. I am all in on Holo and Constellation and will try to get involved with Perlin & Oasis Labs.

These are the projects actually looking to the future.

You sit behind your computer 24/7 typing keywords into google

This

>buying coins with chain in the name

Attached: its-all-so-tiresome-34354344.png (500x380, 96K)

If OP really believes that he is legit retarded lol.
It's just shitcoin #1879.

For science

I don't really get this project but it has performed pretty well. Certainly better than some of the shit I've bought this year. I might put $100 bucks in this shit.

I read the whitepaper too, the math is clearly made to confuse people into thinking it's scientific, when the proofs provided currently mainly explain other things than holochain itself, majority of the paper is focused on the proofs behind Bitcoin, lmao ok but isn't holochain not anything like Bitcoin? Why go into detail on something irrelevant.

t. Math minor compsci major

ikr, seems like they didn't know what to write about but needed a whitepaper for their charity ico. they just threw some math formulas in there to make it look scientific, they knew no one without a math background would ever read it kek..

it's just yet another shitcoin desu, sorry for the anons who got pajeeted.

It's on binance anyone thinking it won't go up is an idiot, but don't treat it like some long-term moon mission, pure speculation and the whitepaper doesn't ease that feeling imo.

Attached: 1526069550419.jpg (988x721, 79K)

Also the whole section about gossip is ripped from hashgraphs whitepaper. Nothing here hasn't been said before, and if I'm correct hashgraphs gossip system is copyrighted.

wow, didn't know about them stealing IP from hashgraph, could end badly. i didn't really believe their "10 years in the making" bullshit anyways, it's totally obvious they just had a general interest in talking about currencies and decided to turn it into a blockchain project after they saw the hype.

Basically Jow Forums is full of neets who wish they had money and financial people who know jack shit about technology.

The rest of us who, do understand the tech, easily see how blockchain is mostly a scam (altcoins), and that Holochain will actually do what most of these scams wish they could do but much much better.

Attached: 1527131356236.png (716x562, 586K)

You faggots will be lucky if this neet wet dream reaches $.01 ever

it's fucking impossible due to holo's dynamic supply / mutual credit system. this shit isn't designed to moon, that's not even a secret kek.

This. The creators have that retarded "making money is bad" attidute and they're going try their hardest to NOT make anyone(else than themselves mabe) rich.

Holochain (HOT) Review: Making the blockchain obsolete
reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/92bodf/holochain_hot_review_making_the_blockchain/

this is the real deal

A challenger appears...its super effective!

Attached: tezos.jpg (1000x1000, 177K)

Plus holo is literally a minimum of 10 years ahead of sky,, and you dont have to gamble on the level of synth's autism

Completely unrelated as far as tech and goal.

holo shills are unironically more deluded than linkies.

future top 10 coin for sure

that will be a huge dump by that time...the next bull run ends bitcoin at either 112k or 54k

I see no reason why it can't $1 this year. I think it could easily pull a XRP. If it has XRP market cap, we are indeed looking at $.80 - $1 HOT.

XRP was 10x more useless than this, and the logo/team didn't appeal nearly as much to normies. I'd be scared to bet my life that this wouldn't hit a $ this year. If we get another bullrun that BTC even hits 16k, this could happen. Let alone if we have a bullrun that is a bit bigger than last years, if we hit ATH again HOT is easily worth over $1.

skycoin faggots detected

>Cloud storage on blockchain
Shypddt

> imagine being this deluded

you are either mentally retarded or a fucking discord pajeet (pic related). there is no other option.

Attached: screenshot-12.jpg (628x504, 102K)

>I see no reason why it can't $1 this year. I think it could easily pull a XRP. If it has XRP market cap, we are indeed looking at $.80 - $1 HOT.
>XRP was 10x more useless than this, and the logo/team didn't appeal nearly as much to normies. I'd be scared to bet my life that this wouldn't hit a $ this year. If we get another bullrun that BTC even hits 16k, this could happen. Let alone if we have a bullrun that is a bit bigger than last years, if we hit ATH again HOT is easily worth over $1.
Art beock, co founder of Holidays even said it could go to $1 on Reddit.

ok pajeet, how's that 3G cell service working out in your shithole desert?

YOU TALK THE TALK BUT LITERALLY NO ONE IS WALKING THE WALK THE VOLUME IS GARBAGE

What's this picture mean?

trade signal

Holo will definitely test 1B cap sometime soon

yeah sure, hey guys, lets pump bitcoin, or ethereum

>the next 1000x

How much does HOLO COST?

Yeah. I don't get why a shitcoin like XRP can get to 100 million but this can't. It has better tech/better memes/better everything than Ripple or EOS. The difference is HOLO is actually useful. During a bullrun this is a 100 billion dollar coin. $1 is not crazy. Ripple had a similar marketcap.

>studied the whitepaper of hundreds of crypto
>shills HOLOCHAIN

Imagine being this retarded Anons.

Attached: studying.jpg (590x350, 44K)