1. Country

Civil law is only used by frogs

civil of course. common law is fucking retarded, especially precedents.

civil law is used by everyone besides anglos

Civil law seems inherently unstable

Common law is the greatest system of law on the planet
I thank the anglos for creating it

Common law.

You're a fucking brainlet if you actually think legislatures are smart and thorough enough to actually spell out every single circumstance a given law applies.
>But this anecdote has common law doing something bad!
Well then the legislation can still swoop in and amend it later. This is also a requirement if something is ill-defined in civil law, so it isn't really a strong argument against common law imo

>law states that murderers get 30 years in prison
>dad beats his son's rapist to death
>30 years in civil prison
>1-5 years in common law with sympathetic Judge and jury

>Son's rapist
If this happened, I would beat my son to death instead

justice is served

We have a mixed of both thanks to angl* influence

how the fuck is it your helpless son's fault if some guy pins him down and gets his way with him? Kids can't protect themselves

Redpilled
abcnews.go.com/US/charges-texas-father-beat-death-daughters-molester/story?id=16612071

if you don't have based mixed law, fuck you

Attached: world-legal-systems-01.png (1080x630, 198K)

there are always brackets and in that situation the father could be found not guilty, propably depending on psychiatric opinion. civil law is about establishing facts, not putting on a show to a bunch of local niggers with no legal education who were randomly assigned the task of deciding someones fate

>You're a fucking brainlet if you actually think legislatures are smart and thorough enough to actually spell out every single circumstance a given law applies.
Who actually argues this? And if legislators can eventually amend a law to make it more precise, why is it good to rely on certain judges' rulings to mold future rulings?

It wouldn't be my son's fault.

But I wouldn't be able to be his father anymore

>hurrrrrr leave the decision up to corrupt judges and not the common man

you're a shitty person

Because legislatures ride around DC in limos and get paid by lobbyists to do things. They're useless and entirely detached from real life situations.
>And if legislators can eventually amend a law to make it more precise
My argument is that they typically don't.

Attached: 1416156175007.png (1198x1200, 93K)

they're chosen randomly adn always from a different court than the case is.

yea but ummmm i thought a bunch of niggers and old people is better than a judge that actually studied law for almost 10 years??

And?
Niggers don't show up for jury duty in the first place you brainlet
>a judge that actually studied law for almost 10 years??
Appeal to authority isn't an argument

If giving judges more leeway because you think they are more in touch with the common man's reality or whatever than legislators is what you favor, why bind a judge's ruling to previous rulings? I imagine part of being in touch with the common man's reality is being more in touch with their social/historical context and older rulings may have taken place in different social settings.

fuck your shitty bait

you don't give judges more leeway you give it to jurors

>judge having to study 10 years of law and knowing all insides and outsides of the law to judge whether someone is guilty or not
>meanwhile in the US
youtube.com/watch?v=vj4xAlCWKg4

Attached: 1550360871433.jpg (645x773, 46K)

Elder Scrolls imperial law
>$1000 fine for murder
>prisons are easily escapable
>cannibalism, slavery, and necrophilia allowed in certain provinces

Injustice doesn't justify other injustices.

The man killed his son's rapist, that's justice in itself

State has a monopoly of murder.

The State has a monopoly on all kinds of violence.

Reality is doesn’t matter what legal system is used, if the country is a corrupt shithole nothing will ever get done properly.