It's happening
It's happening
crowds make me cringe af
why do you watch this shit
He probably thinks it'll make him smart.
For the coming /lit/ memes
To watch peterson get butt fucked by slavic cock.
whats the point of these you gain nothing
pointless and time wasting even jerking off seems more productive than this shit
Are you talking about browsing this website?
what is this? chat is redditshit
Debate between to prominent philosophers.
Entertainment
yeah but the thing is i cant stop browsing because im lazy
wish i had self control
quick rundown on the richard stallman looking motherfucker please
Meme philosopher debate
>chat is redditshit
those would be the peterstein fans
>wash ya dick and everyone will wanna fuck ya
t. peterson
>you don't rise to a position in power by exploiting other people
I knew Jow Forums was stupid but this is in another level.
why is zizek doing this
he's never gonna change petercuck or petercuck's fanboys' minds
jew vs jew
>people paid to hear these people mumble on about some horseshit
Jordan is the ultimate pseud.
money
"all the evil is with the capitalists and all the good is with the proletariat"
seriously he seems like wiki'd to prepare for this and people are clapping for him
What the fuck is even happening to the US? Like, people say the biggest weakness of the EU is that we don't share the same language. Look at the US. Literally every fucking retard from Canada like Peterson, Gavin McInnes, Lauren Southern, Stefan Molyneux, Crowder and British fags like Sargon and Paul Joseph Watson have massive audiences in this cunt because everyone and their mom speaks english. Why the fuck is a greasy Canadian talking about America as if he were a citizen? Normally a countries public political decision should be debated by the fucking electorate and not fucking foreigners...
sup reddit
Honestly I don't know much about zizek, but lobster freud is totally embarrassing.
>why is zizek doing this
I mean, I'm a pseud, but i would totally do this for the lulz.
Politics are the new entertainment.
>Profits isn't theft
>2 secs later
>oh okay profits can be theft
peter jew sounds like a community college professor, why does he have such a massive following of unwashed plebs
zizek isn't an angel either but at least he's funny and has a few original takes that I've gotten insight from in my earlier twenties. he's at least a true "philosopher-clown"
It's crazy in the US isn't is? Everyone treats their country as the Kadashians show. Public political debates should be held by the people actually being able to vote. This is largely the case in European countries because we all have our own language, A polish guy can't debate german politics because he doesn't know german and vis a vis. But because everyone speaks English everyone can also participate in US political debates and that's kind of fucked for the US, don't you think?
I hate to agree with saudi arabia but he's dumb as shit, im completely mindboggled at the longevity and extent of his popularity
yet europe follows all usa culture
because most of what peterson says is common sense and he is likeable, whereas zizek is basically just a drug addicted slav
American politics have huge repercussions on the world like it or not
PETERSON IS A FUCKING BRAINLET
Zizek is also a pseud, he just wants to appear eccentric and interesting so people think he is smarter
UHH
>and that's kind of fucked for the US, don't you think?
Yes it is, wish people would just forget about us and move on to China already.
>ackchually marx and engels like capitalism
fucking hell, has this guy literally ever spend one second reading marxist literature?
historical materialism?
dialectical materialism??
marx and engels see capitalism basically as a natural force, something that just exists historically...
>muh GDP
>people think he is smarter
He already admitted to having an intellectual inferiority complex.
if you never found any value in any of his talks about ideology, movies, psychoanalysis then you might be a brainlet
*sniff*
ah yes, the typical response of a contrarian brainlet who can't refute an argument. dumb fuck
shut the fuck up
>if you never found any value in any of his talks about ideology, movies, psychoanalysis then you might be a brainlet
>listen to two boomers mumble to each other? Nah bro I have more important things to do like finish my backlog on steam and masturbate to JAV
peterstein on a fucking Mac
zizek paid attention to his entire dumb fucking talk without moving a muscle
marx was an anti utopian so why does this guy act like socialism is about a utopia?
im not even a commie but has peterson even read the books?
heh I see you seething rn
there we go again, I see why you are fascinated by a cocaine addict. maybe you can help him rub his nose
he read up wiki and cliffnotes. he's on a fucking mac right now. probably checking on reddit
Peterson ROASTED himself
jesus christ is he choking on his tongue
he can't even read
"we are in this mess because of the jews" -slavoj zizek 2019
NAZBOLGANGANGANG
"the very liberal gays is also evil"
holy shit z is on a roll
THE LIBERAL GAYS
holy shit, he brought up th elobster. peterson is gonna kill himself
>sniffs
>says everything in our current world is caused by ideology
>"and so on and so forth"
>sniffs
But unironically is a very interesting philosopher
Pretty funny how philosophy in general is hated and mocked nowadays. People endlessly trash you for liking philosophy or saying something remotely "philosophical".
How did it end up this way? There is nothing to ponder anymore? Is it viewed so poorly now because the philosophyfags of the last 25 years have been lame or a certain college stereotype ruined it? All ive heard the past 5 years is "it is useless and very cringe to think about stuff like that"
I can't understand anything what he's saying.
it's like listening to rock or doing art. philosophy is dead, everything has been said. the only way to "do" philosophy is to better yourself
Thinking hard about questions which can not be answered is a waste of time.
we are the same you and I
More like every interesting point has already been made by classic literature and there's new nothing to add anymore.
He unironically said that he read the manifesto and based his "critique" on it. It was at the beginning of the debate.
>I read the Communist Manifesto
>I tried to sort the wheat from the chaff
>I found some wheat but mostly chaff
>in the manifesto
>which I acknowledge is a manifesto, a call to revolution, not a work of theory
>I found mostly chaff and not much wheat in a manifesto
Topkek.
Following philosophy is life's greatest cuckery. Imagine following codes laid out by other people instead of doing as you please.
*sniff*
Peterson is a pseudo-intellectual. Marxism is difficult to debate to begin with. This isn't debatable. Capitalism is a boomer meme that is dying.
>Peterson keep getting BTFO all the time
Am I finally going to stop having this guy clutter my feed in youtube?
he's going too deep epistemologically. I don't know why he's opted for this strategy following peterson's brainlet opening, or maybe he's just falling back on his prepared opening statement
everyone on /lit/ is calling him out and saying that peterson fags will still claim he "won"
It's because of the democratization of the written word and the rise of pop culture. In the past, culture was the realm of the intelligent, created by the intelligent. Now culture is popularized and therefore dumbed down. It's not that philosophy is dead, it's not, it's just that brainlets are louder.
Petersonfags are on suicide watch
cockroach theory
no matter how much you stomp them, like cockroaches they keep coming en masse
seething lobsterphile
>americlapping
"PLEASE DONT DO DIS"
>more claps
based
>virgin peterson on a mac laptop
>attemps lame ACHIEVEMENT MANAGED joke
cringe
>I heard no real support of marxism
>zizek literally said china is the greatest success story in modern history within the first minute
>i dont mean to be flippant
>says another instagram meme truism for incel college pseuds to parrot in their essays
bravo
Peterson first 30 mins: I don't know what I am talking about because I didn't read Capital
Zizek first 30 mins: Let's skip the entry-level faggotry and discuss actual problems like how the SJW is destroying the left, How capitalism is sympthom of pure ideological trahs and so on.
I sincerely apologize on behalf of my entire country
Zizek also said he wasnt praising china, and that he is very afraid that it will turn out like that
t.good ears
well yeah. china is sort of an usa equivalent. both have spun straw into gold but both commit what the other considers human rights abuses.
yeah. I like how he opened with an attack on the leftist-liberals and LGBTs. I remember his article about cleaning house months ago
I used to be a leftie until I opened my eyes to the rainbow-nigger-fem party
Even Louis Cachet is much smarter than these two charlatans
lmao do white liberals have no allies in this debate?
Peterson just doesn't understand that Socialism, similarly to Conservatism and Liberalism has dozens of sub-brands. He is talking about Marxist-Lenininism, or Realsozialismus as it existed in Europe in the second half of the 20th century and China/Cuba of course. But like in Conservatism where you have stuff like Christian Democracy or Neoconservatism or Paleoconservatism, in Socialism you also have very different schools of thought like Orthodox Marxism or Democratic Socialism.
Zizek is fully btfoing the canadian
based anarcho egoist
>communism is not egalitarianism but hierarchy
why won't people understand this?
How does he have fans? I've never listened to him talk before but he is completely retarded.
FOLLOW YOUR EGO
Still waiting for JP to actually talk about the topic of tonight (Happiness) instead of his first reading of Communist Manifest, the disingenuous man
The great honkers of our time...
why is meme centrist debating with install gentoo man
but user, people leave cuba to florida
JP is getting owned. It is like he is attending a Zizek lecture now.
Holy shit, he's grilling JP like a school boy
Peterson: Actually, I'm not a capitalist so much as an individualist.
Zizek: Actually, I'm not so much of a Marxist as a Hegelianist.
Does that sum it up?
Well that's a wrap zizek won
Why does Peterson refer to people in academia as post-modern cultural marxists when literally no one in academia identifies as such. He should call out people probably and not use these nebulous wishy-washy terms no one feels offended by.