How did this neet fraud manage to fool so many people?

>said interesting things
No he didn't he said stupidity without private property you have no social organization or culture, communists weren't elected anywhere

Second brainlet

>culture
>social organization
I'm inclined to ask you if Americans have ever experienced either

>communists weren't elected anywhere
Yep, killing anyone who disagrees with them is their "election" style.

>imagine believing that people have innate connection with you to fulfill social desires that you wish
Communism is complete nonsense and without private property you will have no civilization.

>without private property you have no social organization or culture

Even with private property in the case of your country

I take solace in the fact that the Zizek vs Peterson debate made many former marxist communists as myself realize how misguided they were by leftist marxist dogma and see the merits of right wing thought. I'm no longer a fan of Trotsky and Stalin and regret being one.

Private property is our culture and social organization. I think it's a valid induction from that anons post.

>a fan of Trotsky AND Stalin

Attached: thonking.png (512x512, 24K)

FACTS and LOGIC saved you

Based and REDpilled
Why are classcucks such pathetic weaklings? You must be drowning on soy. All wojak posters are affeminated

>Hello, I hate right, but aren't leftists retarded
>t. Totally a real marxist, honest

user, Moscow was a city during the soviet era too.
I mean, do you even know what the word "civilisation" means?

Yes it is, just like every extremist fringe political view. If I ever had to choose a political posterchild though I'd rather take Marx over Ayn Rand.
And without socialist and marxist movements you'd have as little private property as possible.

Leftist movements back then advocated for worker's rights and democracy instead of being a monarchist and corporatist puppet.

>communism is invalid because clean your room and find a job

Attached: 4fb.jpg (680x680, 69K)

Soviet Union used state force and didn't have communism.

States are a creation of private property

Ayn rand is an anti social lunatic.

Simple people belive simple things.

>Soviet Union used state force and didn't have communism
>States are a creation of private property
>this is what anarcucks actually believe

>people conflating private and personnal property once again
private property designates specifically property designed to produce capital

???
i was wondering how one could admire both stalin and trotsky
every commie i met absolutely hates trotsky

I'm glad we agree that extremists should all fuck off

>Leftist movements back then advocated for worker's rights and democracy instead of being a monarchist and corporatist puppet.

And still becoming a puppet to the commie party, killing millions without a trial.
Also read about soviet (forced)collectivization and "пpoдpaзвёpcткa".

>Marx over Ayn Rand

Fucking debil

"Atlas shrugged" actually serves as a warning to the US. If you failed grasp how exactly - i feel sorry for you.
(i'm not her fanboy tho)

>Fucking debil

Attached: Morozov_Dmitry[1].jpg (1280x960, 285K)

Yeah we get it, Stalinism sucked but don't blame any ideology for retarded ruskies

>beh-meh dat wuznt ril kamunizm reee

Pol Pot, Mao, Che and so on

Marx had his role in history. His revolution was utopic, but his ideas helped improve capitalism as whole.not concerned only with profits for the high class. Nowadays expecting someone take weapons to take down the system instead of watching porn is dumb.