Why does this make sudacas seethe so much?

I not familiar with the term and it sounds like an offensive term (latin+stinks), but it probably is another case of feminists trying to make language gender neutral.

That would be USA, Chile, and Uruguay

it's really big in Argentina and Spain, it's rather divisive actually.
neither of which are socialist countries btw.

I know I know but they are very leftie and I wanted to mock them for trying to make a romance language gender neutral

First time I ever hear of this term,what is about ?

Stallman's suggestion of using e instead of a/o for gendered nouns is way better.

uk is a shithole

b&r

It's a bourgeoisie invention that's never gonna catch on the mainstream. And I if you are gonna try to make Spanish gender neutral at least use the actually pronounceable "e" instead of a fucking x.

Using an e at the end of words in our country is the stereotypical ignorant native accent, culturally we see it as offensive. Why do people care about a language being gendered?

It's some dumbshit invented by Californians, therefore trash.

It's a quicker than having to do "latinos y latinas" or other deviations of that. The "x" is a weird fucking way to do it, but using e or i as a replacement makes it more practical. The problem isn't so much the language being gendered. The problem is that defaulting to male genders isn't accurate. For example, if you're addressing a crowd of mixed gender architects, using "arquitectos" ignores half your crowd, "arquitectos/arquitectas" is long, and "arquitectxs" is unpronounceable.

No it does not, plural is masculine in spanish

>wanting to rape a language just for having to say an extra word
fuck earth
fuck jannies

But a rape language for rape babies seem like a good fit T B H

it sounds more macabre to speak properly and be a rapist detbhsu

>The problem is that defaulting to male genders isn't accurate

Attached: 1530446594320.png (644x740, 11K)

Languages evolve to meet the needs and wants of the people using it. You're right that plural is masculine but this is a way to be more precise.

Extremely high quality and informative comment, thank you for your great contribution.

Languages evolve because people are too much of a fucking crybaby or stupid to properly use it.

because it's a word that mutts came up to classify all hispanics.

you're welcome bro, here's another

>Languages evolve to meet the needs and wants of the people using it. You're right that plural is masculine but this is a way to be more precise.

Attached: 1518521327077.png (866x812, 240K)

>The problem is that defaulting to male genders isn't accurate. For example, if you're addressing a crowd of mixed gender architects, using "arquitectos" ignores half your crowd,
that's fucking stupid fuck off
you default to masculine because men are more important than women so you talk to them first
god made adam and then eve ok ?
kill yourself american trash

be careful, here they infected us with "inclusive writing" , pic related
fucking disgusting

Attached: DMQRA-eWkAAeu9F.jpg (739x670, 82K)

because everything in this cunt is based on appearance and first impressions

seriously be ready for leftists to force some bullshit like
"latina.o.s"
"elloa"
"amigo.a.s"

Attached: casta_pofession_foi.jpg (640x505, 116K)

No actual American cares about the Spanish language. It's some trigglypuff tier 2nd generation Mexican

based

I like Spanish

>Americans come up with a new LARP term

It' ONLY really a movement in Spain amd Argentina (and maybe Uruguay who knows) but still not as big as in LOS EE UU

As bad as that is, just wait til you guys see LATIN@

Think in y'all, ebonics, redneckism, broken English and all the things that ruins English.

Well, those X stupidity is the same thing but in Spanish and Portuguese.

god is fucking dead

Why the X? Why not just say latin american?

so it's neither male or female, latino-latina

Latin american is a gender neutral term already
Why reinvent the wheel?

please dont lump me with chicanos and latinos living among white people

Because that's not how Spanish works

>The problem isn't so much the language being gendered. The problem is that defaulting to male genders isn't accurate. For example, if you're addressing a crowd of mixed gender architects, using "arquitectos" ignores half your crowd

BY USING SOMETHING THE GRAMMAR OF THE LANGUAGE SAYS YOU ARE REPRESENTING A WHOLE GROUP YOU ARE IGNORING HALF OF THE CROWD???????

Are you trying to push the "moron 'murica" meme? Cause if so you are doing a good fucking job. Godspeed, idiot.

because spics are fucking retarded

youtube.com/watch?v=6AbzMSKnZCc

Attached: Lenguaje.jpg (1586x1646, 189K)

>Flag
How is Nicaragua? Sorry for stopping a bunch of you at the border.

what is the difference between chicano and latino? You don't actually call yourself latino in the south?

OP is a burger CHI with a proxy

I think any normal spanish person will beat you to a bloody pulp if you refer to them as LatinX.
We use "Latina"& "Latino" only to refer to LATIN Americans, not to spanish. Because we dont treat the spanish like subhumans as you do with mexicans.

Stop believing that bullshit, women in Latin America support the proper usage of the language.

muh latinx inclusion

sorry guys, our fault. or well, the judeo-spics in this country. it's like an LGBT thing. For a place to be really trendy it needs to be latinx and lgbt inclusive, black lives matter

The economy needs to tank for a good couple of decades until people stop giving a shit about muh inclusiveness that's just a sign of late stage markets running out of shit to sell to the people

no this just has to do with america being crazy. latinx is really trendy, I thought it came off tumblr.

initiate communism (the real marxist thing, not the post modern lefty liberalism)

>"latinx"
>not "latine"