>1 fav = 1 vox vote i throw to the trash
is this type of thing common in your country elections
1 fav = 1 vox vote i throw to the trash
Other urls found in this thread:
fee.org
twitter.com
No, people who count the votes can't use the interwebs.
Wow that’s actually pretty based...I don’t know why but I think I’m falling for this girl. What’s her name?
>me gusta
What is vox? If they’re leftyfag, I’ll support
redpill me on the spanish election
Is vox left wing? I’ll support them if they are.
its a boy
in what? economic policies? im guessing you only care about inmigrant policies tho
>Podemos wants to give free healthcare to any inmigrant, legal or illegal
>VOX wants to kick out illegal inmigrants on the spot, and kick out legal inmigrants if they commit a serious crime
>Rest are mostly average european stance on migrants
Hope he'll go to jail
>and kick out legal inmigrants if they commit a serious crime
lol what the fuck? Not even a lefty but that’s fucked up, if they’re legal, they’re Spanish, and thus they should go through the same legal process as anyone else.
he was probably just kidding
theres a few police checking to see if you're voting properly, besides 2 other civilian people sitting besides you to count
Is he cute?
>lower business taxes
into the trash they go
Pretty based tb h. Those Vox guys are one of the cringiest political group I ever saw
obviously immigrants without spanish citizenship
I support VOX, fuck the faggot in the OP. Should be shot for election fraud
Spain I have a question...
i dont know !
what would you like to ask
>American intellectuals
Is Spain a hot country, like is the temperature hot?
based fascismo nunca
(first (you))
I was saying I’d support throwing out a VOX vote if they were leftists, but since it’s right wing I’d rather not
>is this type of thing common in your country elections
Yes, we can actually understand jokes
yes a bit, specially in the south, but its not as hot as florida
the north is green and chilly
>if they’re legal, they’re Spanish
Is this why Catalan can't get their independence?
why do you support vox? genuine question, I find it queer how an american has an interest in yuropoor politics
His heart is EVROPEAN
They want to kick dirty mudslims out of Europe
maybe if his blood pressure and cholesterol levels are uncharacteristicly low.
why is it fucked up? if you were given the chance to live in a country that isn't yours, you should be held to a higher standard. are you fine with criminal degenerates as long as they come in legally?
Lowering business taxes is one of the best decisions any government can make.
fair enough
how so?
>hey we hate muslims vote for us
cringe
Businesses generate wealth.
so does taxing businesses
look at Ireland. We need employment desperately
Vox means voice. (Your voice->vote)
It's literally the opposite.
alright maybe I'm misinformed and dumb. could you please give me a piece of education?
BASED
>Podemos wants to give free healthcare to any inmigrant, legal or illegal
Nothing wrong with that though.
>VOX wants to kick out illegal inmigrants on the spot, and kick out legal inmigrants if they commit a serious crime
That's ok, but they're batshit insane.
Omg bros I'm literally shaking I thought we were gonna destroy the fags and the lefties and they won hold me I'm crying
Not taxing = business has more money, business has more money = more investment, more invesment = more money, more money = expansion, expansion = more jobs
So you can't explain something you believe in by your own words
Lol
rofl MUTTwannabes believe trickledown in 2019
60 trillion dollars in private and public debt Trying to steal venezuelan oil Supporting Franco and Salaza Financing Bin Laden and Taliban Brazil 1964 Argentina 1976 Greece 1967 Haiti 1915 Stolen mexican lands Supporting pedophile paraguayan dictator Paying corrupt jurists and politicians in Latin America War on Terror Patriot Act PRISM Edward Snowden Guantanamo Bay CIA black sites Human Rights NSA mass surveillance Warrantless Wiretapping 4th Amendment violations Julian Assange whistle-blower manhunt Ecuadorian embassy refuge Corporate interests worker's rights healthcare rights free education Police militarization incarceration rate fake weapons of mass destruction Petrodollar warfare Israel "special" relationship ban on boycott Free Palestine USS Liberty attack Mossad cover up false anti-semitism accusations depleted uranium mutinions war crime ignoring the Geneva Convention Agent Orange My Lai Massacre Contras 1973 Chile coup CIA backing puppet dictators Illegal Occupation 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état United Fruit Company Cuban Missile Crisis Bay of Pigs Operation Northwoods Area51 Saudi lobby American Cover-Up of Trials of Unit 731 Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse MKUltra Tuskegee syphilis experiment Suspension of Habeas Corpus Sedition Acts civil rights Martin Luther King murder Cointelpro Bombing of Libya Bombing of Yemen Bombing of Syria Intervention in Yugoslavia Philippine Genocide of 1900 Choctaw Trail of Tears Andrew Jackson illegal Overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii haole invasion Okinawa rapes Jarhead rapists migrant caravan ICE children in cages Russian puppet president
but then who should be taxed?
>2019
>Trickled down economics
BASED
Do you also believe in Santa Claus user?
Which one spaniards prefer?
in america they just "find" truckloads or carloads of votes
who won?
PSOE has twice the number of votes than the second largest party
VOX seems like an ideal party, objectively speaking.
PSOE
I don't understand how people can't just think this through. This lays it out fairly well Ideally the things the provide more people to tax should be taxed less.
No one
Goverment need only fund police, army and courts. Anything else can be easy carried by prvate sector
Why the fuck do you want more jobs? There's only so much there is to do to sustain a society and i'm sure any first world european country has already reached that stage. Newer businesses are not able to compete with the big shots and less tax for them only means more profit to the CEO, same shit salary for employees and less revenue for the state. It's bullshit.
>VOX seems like an ideal party, objectively speaking.
More like retardly speaking because only bumbling inbred retards vote for Vox.
>I don't understand how people can't just think this through.
Because it almost never works that way
Right, because society will collapse if it were not for those secretaries, retailers and telemarketers.
That's a fallacious appeal. You have to demonstrate why their policies aren't excellent (which they objectively are).
Says the person that only progressed when the markets were opened up in the 70s and is the most stable country on its continent
the pp is a nest of corruption, and Citizens is a delusional neo-liberal that would turn spain into argentina party.
No wonder why PSOE that is shit party and another corruption nest won. Podemos is a joke btw.
ay espana.
Nobody, ideally but practically, you'd probably have to tax everyone just a little bit in order to not have complete anarchy. Just a little though.
But you are wrong.
>Not taxing = business has more money
True.
>business has more money = more investment
Why? Business may decide to give money to the investors instead of investing more.
>more invesment = more money
No if the inversment fails.
> more money = expansion, expansion = more jobs
True.
Now, think about this.
Taxing = state has more money, state has more money = more social services, more social services = more jobs, more jobs = more money
Most of the money that the Spanish goverment take go into Spanish hand, when the rich get tax cut they may take their money away.
Only absolute retards like trickle down economy in 2019.
Of course, how else would you win them here?
They aren't, trickle down economics have failed time and time again and only benefits the rich, which is why they are tried time and time again, because rich people invest in politicians and propaganda so people vote whatever fits them.
>Citizens is a delusional neo-liberal that would turn spain into argentina party.
More like into Colombia since everyone there consumes coke.
this meme again...
we produce coke we don't consume it.
>and is the most stable country on its continent
We were one of the most (along with Uruguay) stables in South America long before the 70's
>Says the person that only progressed when the markets were opened up in the 70s
That's because the goverment sold tons of state owned companies, and then having the copper supecycle
Just look now at our goverment, average copper prices and almost no state owned companies to sell and we're stagnating, they have no idea on how to sustain high growth like the past 2 decades
Obviously not, but society is poorer if less goods and services are being produced.
You clearly don't have a very good grasp on reality. It's sad, but then again, I always try to keep in mind that half of the world's population is below average intelligence.
Perhaps less goods. Nobody needs services. Fuck services.
Yes and you are clearly below average intelligence if you believe in trickle down economics and selling public property like Vox proposes, show me at least one good example of that shit working long term, trust me you won't find one.
>implying
Each voting ballot has one president, two vocal assistants and usually several representatives of many political parties.
Are you seriously thinking at least five or six people are going to risk up to 5 years of jail to throw away 30 or 40 votes?
People like you deserve your poverty.
>Because it almost never works that way
Really?
What the fuck man. You're telling me i deserve poverty, what for?
Damn what about if i tell you you deserve diseases and death? You're fucked in the head.
My man, you've stated multiple falsehoods with the confidence of a complete fool and demonstrated a severe lack of understanding of basic micro- and macroeconomics. Not to mention the severe effects of allowing the flood of migrants to continue flooding the your country and the continent. I do not believe you can be reasoned with.
Yes
>>business has more money = more investment
>Why? Business may decide to give money to the investors instead of investing more.
Giving money to the investors is only a thing for S.A., even then its technically an investment since the more momey investors recive the more investors your business atracts, the more investors = more money etc.
>>more invesment = more money
>No if the inversment fails.
Everything can fail, at the end of the day luck and/or skill are allways factors that apply but are out of the reach of the state
>monarchism
>lower business and rich people taxes
The whole party and whoever voted for them should go into the trash.
>Taxing = state has more money, state has more money = more social services, more social services = more jobs, more jobs = more money
I guess the government could just pay people to dig holes. That would create all kinds of jobs.
Theres a very high chance that nothing was thrown away at the end.
>t. assisted multiple times
Extrapolate.
>My man, you've stated multiple falsehoods with the confidence of a complete fool and demonstrated a severe lack of understanding of basic micro- and macroeconomics.
Explain the falsehoods I have said (not fallacies, I have said fallacies here because I never intended to have a serious discussion) and why I don't understand micro or macro economics.
>Not to mention the severe effects of allowing the flood of migrants to continue flooding the your country and the continent. I do not believe you can be reasoned with.
My parents are inmigrant so I will never oppose inmigration, I support inmigrants, and while I hate Islam, I don't think that the proposals of Vox will help anything.
Also, Spanish inmigration has nothing to do with the absolute state of Sweden.
>Giving money to the investors is only a thing for S.A., even then its technically an investment since the more momey investors recive the more investors your business atracts, the more investors = more money etc.
The tax cut would only be noticiable for S.A. and big companies in a way they can invest more, 1000 € difference at the end of the year for a little business doesn't impact as much what they can invest, and many time the owner may decide to save that money one year to another instead of spending right away, slowing the economy in short term.
>Everything can fail, at the end of the day luck and/or skill are allways factors that apply but are out of the reach of the state
When the money is spent in a doctor who take care of people, there's no probability of failing, it will always be better if the money is spent on the doctor than if it's not, because then there's a chance to save people's life, and the money that doctor also goes back to the economy anyway because doctor are not rich enough to move their money elsewhere.
>I guess the government could just pay people to dig holes. That would create all kinds of jobs.
The goverment doesn't have infinite money.
Businesses just can't move enough money to make meaningful impact. In reality almsot all advance was state sponsored.
Most of the time the investors just take that extra money away to other countries. It already happened here a lot of times.
Pinochet already tried that. It was called PEM and POJH.
People could barely survive, creating poverty problems that we still can't solve
yeah people now talk about space x. Without decades of research in the NASA and the soviets space x would be impossible.
>Taxing = state has more money, state has more money = more social services, more social services = more jobs, more jobs = more money
Woah... is this... the power... of socialism?
Pretty much this
>Woah... is this... the power... of socialism?
Yes, with it you can have bigger economies with less economic disparities where everyone can lead a good life.
>Businesses just can't move enough money to make meaningful impact.
In Spain 95% of the businesses are small or middle-sized companies (less than 10 employees).
Fixing the economy of Spain is directly linked to lightening fiscal pressure on them and allowing them more freedom of action.
>>business has more money = more investment
>Why? Business may decide to give money to the investors instead of investing more.
And then investors invest more.
>>more invesment = more money
>No if the inversment fails.
Well it's a good thing that investment in the macro doesn't fail.
>when the rich get tax cut they may take their money away.
Corporate tax cuts are not tax cuts to the rich.
instead of reducing taxes you could do as Trump did: protectionism. So instead of paying for a shitty expensive coffee in starbucks go to yours uncle's coffe/bar.
>instead of reducing taxes you could do as Trump did: protectionism
that only works when you have strong national industry
we dismantled most of it to join the EU and became a tourist trap country
a country that lives off tourism becoming an autarky is solemnly retarded
So Spain's solution to their crisis is higher taxes? Lol
We're talking about lifting taxes to rich bussiness, not those small ones