What plans is your country implementing to make it less white?

based NH will give me relocation NEETbux to replace the wh*tes and conquer their women

Cohesive communities with a strong sense of community are more resilient. Its easier to control the divided.

>noooooooooo stop replacing us you evil minorities!
*replaces native population*

Attached: 6B4111B9-4B9D-432B-9C36-872B99BA69D8.jpg (1080x1020, 72K)

I read the OP as plans that are taking place right now or in the future, my bad

decades of massive immigration
criminalisation of dissent
projects of Afro-EU collaboration that could multiply migration flows
western europe will become minority european in our lifetime

It doesn't have any big cities and it's far from Mexico

You can say the same about almost all hispanic countries, they are not real natives.

>projects of Afro-EU collaboration
Like what

by that logic no one's a native. native americans migrated from Asia when there was land connecting it.

It's just a matter of time
Racial composition 1990[39] 2000[40] 2010[38]
White 98.0% 96.0% 93.9%

Bolivia is and Paraguay is 100% mixed and still speaks native lingo

But was there people before the natives?

Post face

Yep, the only native people are the ones who built their country. In case of the US it's european whites.
That's why i said almost, they are still mestizos tho.

>native americans migrated from Asia when there was land connecting it.
What does that have to do with anything
>and still speaks native lingo
Well, I speak English but I'm not British

there's already been a pact to facilitate migration signed in marrakesh, some EU guys are already talking about the benefits of join markets to rival China and America

>>and still speaks native lingo
>Well, I speak English but I'm not British
You aren't anglo though my point is The landlocked counties are still very native culturally

>The landlocked counties are still very native culturally
Perhaps Bolivia. You're just assuming about Paraguay

What's the name of the pact

The people and their culture is what essential. You can kill all the ethnic germans in Germany and replace them with africans, and it will be a completely different country.(shithole)
When whites become a minority in the US and white culture will stop being mainstream the US will not be the same. You can compare this process with actual romans and gemanics who larped as them in the Dark ages.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Compact_for_Migration

Have sex

>have sex with non white woman goy

>still speaks native lingo
Only in meme rural communities where they eat unironic monkey soup.

The only correct vision of history desu

>in the case of the US it's European Whites
That's absolutely untrue. African peoples contributed as well (and not only as picking cotton slaves), as did Chinese men on the West Coast, and that's only taking into account pre-1914 development. A very substantial chunk of the US development has happened since the 1970's, and in that you'll find people of all ethnicities.

Before 1940's US was literally an ethno state. Black people were segregated and didn't affect american culture much, beyond music.
> A very substantial chunk of the US development has happened since the 1970'
After WW2 in 1950s US had 54% of world GDP, it was at a peak of its power.

First of all blacks weren't segregated everywhere, second of all they still took part in building the country.
>After WW2 in 1950s US had 54% of world GDP
Point being? Do Americans today not use infrastructure built by people of pretty much all races? Is the tangible wealth of the current USA not a result of the collaborative work of people from all backgrounds?

I did it was disappointing, now why are those in power doing everything they can to make it seems like Jow Forums is right

Thats not a EU-Africa arrangement (god I wished it was because that would limit its application to Africa).

Freelancers hired by the New York Times to write opinion columns are, as far as I know, not part of the people with power in the United States of America.

If you remove blacks from the US history, the country would still be the same. Probably even more peaceful.
.>Point being?
Point being is that americans had industrial capabilities and economy to build pretty much anything they wanted. Without third world immigrants, who only useful as a cheap workforce. (except for the few specialists)

>If you remove blacks from the US history, the country would still be the same.
Same as if you removed an equivalent amount of whites, which is to say, not the same.

No one hates white people(specifically white men) more than white liberals(mostly the women)

>After WW2 in 1950s US had 54% of world GDP, it was at a peak of its power.
dumbass, the rest of the industrialized world was in shambles after two world wars. Domination of the world economy came because of the wars not because of meme ethno-nationalism

>he actually thinks that blacks and whites have equal impact on history
This is completely retarded and you know it.

It’s not an opinion piece it was literally a meeting government officials and activists to diversify the area
nytimes.com/2018/07/27/us/new-hampshire-white-diversify.html

he's not wrong, in states like Maryland and Lousiana blacks had a major part in the industrialization of those states. Even in the west a signifcant part of cowboy culture came from blacks because out in those territories slave laws either didn't exist or weren't enforced

I never said it was because of ethnostate. I only pointed that US was an economic powerhouse before diversity.

we aren't 100% mestizos, after the triple alianza war most of the true mestizos men were killed arround 90% only kid and elder man suvirved to repopulate the country but this role was replace in the postwar by massive inmigration from Spain, Italy, Argentina, Brazil, Poland, Germany, Uk, Korea and Japan

Attached: ItaliansInParaguay.jpg (595x579, 48K)

and the US grew even more after immigration laws were reformed to let more people in. The reason the US was so dominant in the 50s was because of the consequences of the two world wars

North was much more industrialized and they didn't have slavery.
> blacks had a major part in the industrialization of those states.
They just did what whiteys told them to do.
> Even in the west a significant part of cowboy culture
nah
It's mostly from symbiosis of mexican and white cultures.

>a russkie thinks he knows more about american history than an actual american
clown world

>and the US grew even more after immigration laws were reformed to let more people in
Almost every country had grown. If US would still be 90% white with 400 million population, it would be much more powerful and safe.

So europeans arent native because they came via turkey ?

Moderd Europeans came from Caucasus and Eastern European steppes.

>american education
>black "history" month
No thanks.

Aside from the fact that it's not necessarily true, what you're saying is, non-White Unitedstatians do indeed have an effect on what the USA are and thus an integral part of the country?

>Almost every country had grown.
but the US grew the fastest. this coincides with having a more diverse population
>If US would still be 90% white with 400 million population, it would be much more powerful and safe.
highly unlikely. Russkie, learn to read actual trends before coming up with dumb hypothetical scenarios

>Russian PISA scores
yikes!

If you actually read the article they say it's because New Hampshire needs to be able to attract skilled workers, and they think it being 94 % could be harder in a country that's scheduled to become >50 % nonwhite in the next decades.

>Aside from the fact that it's not necessarily true
Somalians sure contributed a lot to the US.
Aside from East asians and few indian specialists those "minorities" are only good for being used by the capitalists to make more profit, because they are cheap.

What do they have to do with the influence of black people?

>and they think it being 94 % could be harder in a country that's scheduled to become >50 % nonwhite in the next decades
so they're saying whites are dumb.

Russian education is shit, simply put he doesn't know what he's talking about

>but the US grew the fastest. this coincides with having a more diverse population
This is complete crap. China is literally an ethnostate, and their economy grew much faster.
>highly unlikely. Russkie, learn to read actual trends before coming up with dumb hypothetical scenarios
Despite being only 13% of the population...

Poe's law

No, they're saying they'll have a more limited access to human resources if only whites are willing to move to NH.

Even the poorest euro nationals are much more desirable immigrants than spics and africans.

>This is complete crap. China is literally an ethnostate, and their economy grew much faster.
not because it's an ethnostate but because of the reforms of Deng to lay the foundations for Xi guide chinese state companies
>Despite being only 13% of the population...
still generate more wealth than the average russkie

And how does that negate what I said?

Why don't they trying to diversify black or latino neighborhoods?

Reads like an Onion headline.

>muh economy grew because of diversity
china is almost 100% han Chinese
>b-but that's because of reforms
Leftists are truly retarded.
>still generate more wealth than the average russkie
Still have about 80 IQ.
Average russian 97
White american 100

>Even the poorest euro nationals are much more desirable immigrants than spics and africans.
not true, education matters more than anything else. Educated africans will generate much more wealth than poor euro immigrants. Even poor hispanics do better since the remittances they will send back to relative to poor euros is much less when you account for the weakness in their economies meaning more money stays in America

I do, every day.

doesn't, just wanted to point out it's not "diversify for the sake of diversifying" like many anons seem to want it to be

But they do

I'm talking about your average immigrant, not specialist.
European specialist >>> african specialist btw

>Leftists are truly retarded.
congrats russkie! you proved me right, russian education is shit
>Average russian 97
and yet you still can't into economics, says a lot doesn't it?

Why? Doesn't make any sense. What makes a specialist great is what he knows, not his ethnicity.

>European specialist >>> african specialist btw
so you'll take a fresh PHD student with only one paper under his belt than a season professor simply on grounds of race? Now I understand why Russia can't into economics!

Should i do it againt? Ok
>but the US grew the fastest. this coincides with having a more diverse population
China is not diverse
>not because it's an ethnostate but because of the reforms of Deng to lay the foundations for Xi guide chinese state companies

that implies non-whites are inherently more qualified.

it doesn't make sense. the article IS about diversifying for the sake of it. that other bullshit they used to justify it with is just to keep conservatives from rioting.

his IQ

In the first generation. Afterwards if they experience about the same education the one from a higher IQ country will be likely to generate more wealth. You also don't turn the countries into shitholes by getting their specialists.

Why do you think that is?

this

untrue, nigeria and india are poor countries and yet nigerian and indian immigrants will stay educated and highly paid even beyond two or three generations compared to immigrants from serbia or poland

A black person's IQ isn't systematically lower than a white person's, though. People aren't statistic averages.

No it doesn't, it implies that you, New Hampshire, will be in a market with only 500 people willing to work for you, whereas others will have a full array of 1000 people.
Conservatives don't read past headlines anyway so it's absolutely not to keep them from rioting, quite the contrary possibly, in fact.

More BLACK BVLLS.

What are you then

nigerian immigrants are the lowest of the low
>indian
They are actually decent people, but they are technically asian immigrants. And you don't see much anti asian rhetoric, because they act civil and respect white population and culture. Usually.

globalist neo leftist IQ

Attached: discord tranny.png (1051x1238, 140K)

>nigerian immigrants are the lowest of the low
The average Nigerian American household had an income of 60k US$ in 2016. Compare to the US national median of 59k US$ for that same year.

No plan, we have no whites

Attached: 1543353731974.png (1012x568, 841K)

read the statistics on nigerian immigrants in america. They are much better than russian ones on all fronts.
>They are actually decent people, but they are technically asian immigrants. And you don't see much anti asian rhetoric, because they act civil and respect white population and culture. Usually.
don't move the goalposts russkie. you supported the statement
> the one from a higher IQ country will be likely to generate more wealth.
but this is untrue based on statistics

That's because most Nigerians that come to the US are specialists. Compare them to the ones who live in Europe.

Never heard of Nigerian mafias desu. Russian mafias operating in Spain, on the other hand...

Russians fall into "white" category when it comes to the household income statistics.
>read the statistics on nigerian immigrants in america
A lot of lower class russians came to the US after the collapse of Soviet Union.

>read the statistics on nigerian immigrants in america. They are much better than russian ones on all fronts.
nigerian 60k, russian 77k

wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income

This desu. Old Straight White Male Joe Biden's polling for the Dem primary is highest among minorities and lowest for progressive whites.

give birth