/colonizers/

haha you dont have a wife we already took them and only the ugly ones remained

Attached: devil.jpg (512x512, 37K)

Hungary? I don't get it, explain.

*takes the only seat at the VIP table*
Hello bitches.

Attached: nothingpersonel.jpg (672x408, 78K)

Guten tag

Attached: 01598533-8841-416B-9D46-A3A1ECAC27E6.png (1200x859, 226K)

Heh nothing personal Bulcsu

Attached: Schlacht-auf-Lechfeld-Muelich-1457.jpg (1024x1001, 236K)

What if our vassal was a colonizer?

desu that's more down the the danes

Magyars were more like the rest of the huns and they migrated from somewhere east of the black sea. I think the people in Hungary did mix with them but those Magyars are different from white hungarians today.
Unlike with scandinavians, they were rampaging brutes on ships and didn't migrate that much at all, at leas around scandinavia. So I can acually still blame them for their raids.

hello

Attached: usa.png (721x520, 61K)

he's talking about the amount of english-sounding words in dutch, not viking influence on english

Attached: storb vikinger.png (793x879, 949K)

Yea those places are currently colonizing the USA and not the other way around.

The vikings weren't "rampaging brutes", that's a misconception painted by asshurt english and french monks. They were first and foremost explorers and traders.
"To viking" means "to journey" in old norse. It's a verb, not a noun or an adjective.

>vikings wuz good boys dey dindu nuffin

>sick fucks
cope nigger

Attached: f791e6193ab3585653a98b271096b4514c34d7d413409bf9f30dee6073ed99bb.jpg (785x731, 101K)

Those colonies have a combined population of about 500, the US could swallow them without a burp.

104952889

Attached: 1551919257573.png (863x651, 38K)

They were rampaging brutes that left several big loads of potent viking jizz in the womb of my ancestors wive.
The first word of my son wasn't "Dad" or "Mom" it was "dritt."

Attached: 1519243318329.png (882x758, 16K)

wtf I hate Norway now

Doesn't matter, they don't attempt to swallow them its the other way around.

No, I'm not

What did it say before you put "Norwegian" next to the red color. Norse or something? I can see that this image has been shopped, i can tell from the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time

then you're pretty uninformed, look at the map
we did plenty of things aswell on the british isles, but when it comes to mid-southern England (Mainly wessex and Mercia), the heart of the anglo-saxon culture at the time, the danes did most of the conquering.
Don't get me wrong, we certainly tried, just much later. Hardråde wanted to claim the English throne and invaded in 1066, only to die on Stamford bridge.

It said norse, yeah. I can't imagine, given the picture's context, that "norse" means anything other than "Norwegian", so I corrected it.

Fuck your map

How about you stop fucking our women and apologize!

Attached: 1510768965894.png (686x689, 85K)

My town was founded by Norse settlers

Attached: thumb.jpg (1000x800, 61K)

yeah it must have been a mistake. Norse is more a term for all Scandinavians during the period i guess

Yup, which is why I specified it.

WE were the original colonizers

travel to rob, very nice hobby, not a fan of ships though, horses are better

Where the fuck are our reparations???
time for you whiteys to pay up

We're not wh*Te anglo boi, now give me yo wife mofo

I thought Greenland was a Danish colony?

All the atlantic norse posessions only formally became danish in 1814. before that they were property of the kingdom of Norway. When Denmark-Norway happened the islands were all "danified", but formally still part of Norway.

So they the Greenlanders were first colonized by Danish people then by Norwegian people?

wait I meant the other way around, I am drunk sorry

Yes
Why are you drinking in the middle of the day

it's 20:37 in the evening here and it is a holiday called Valborgsmässoafton I just got back from my family's house

Other way around

Oh I forgot how young this thread is lol

använder du en proxy?

>norway
>colonisers
yes
>svalbard
>jan mayen
>buvetoy
very nice colonies you have there

What are you talking about

I WISH we were being colonized by oceanic qts

Hvussu tar norðmannir æri fór föroysveldi???

it was ceded to denmark in 1814 because sweden deemed it too irrelevant to fight over, icluding iceland and the faroese islands, which were considered a part of norway until that point. the first people who settled greenland were norwegians and icelanders led by eric the red

we should hugged them

Nei :^)

Attached: 1487010523044.png (1094x1523, 172K)

that top right one is possibly the most delusional map i've ever seen

its /skandi/ autism bait except for the maps from 1658, 1814 and 2014

kalmar union

Thank you for making this cunt less retarded sven

Attached: Potop_20szwedzki.jpg (892x823, 368K)

SWEDEN STRONG!

SWEDEN BIG!

shit i meant the top left

Attached: retard5.jpg (415x470, 39K)

>swedish viking
oxymoron

no worries my anglo venn we all make mistakes

Attached: 902.jpg (680x544, 33K)

SWEDISH VIKINGS ARE THE ONLY REAL VIKINGS!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Björn_Ironside

NORGAY VIKINGS ARE FAKE VIKINGS!

NORGAY DOESN'T EVEN HAVE RUNESTONES, LMAO!

probably a dane who conquered svealand. there are literally no contemporary sources mentioning swedish vikings

:)

Attached: very positive reaction.jpg (1000x712, 73K)

t. country with no runestones. danes never conquered svealand in those times, you are delusional

dude that's not true either...

those runestones were made by swedish runecarvers, but were commissioned by danish and norwegian vikings. see the håkon jarl runestones for example. considering the fact that there are literally no contemporary mentions of swedish viking activity, this is most likely the truth

Very unlikely given swedish military presence and control over Svealand, you don't just enter enemy territory and carve runestones to celebrate your conquests abroad. Västgötalagen confirms that Swedish Varangians went East to Greece, but the only Swede that we know for a fact went west is Björn Järnsida. He's also buried on Swedish territory and like I said, you don't bury your own chieftain on enemy controlled territory. Björn was the son of Ragnar who was the son of Sigurd Ring, king of the Swedes.

this "ragnar" you're referring never existed, just like his father, and if he did, he was most likely a dane, considering that his alleged sons are called danes in the anglo-saxon chronicle. in all probability, if ragnar existed, he would have been a danish king who conquered svealand, and who was succeeded there by his equally legendary son björn. the westrogothic law was written centuries after the viking age ended, so it is by no means proof of swedish viking activity

all in all, literally no proof of any swedish vikings ever existing

Attached: vestfald.png (686x65, 9K)

ANGLOS ARE NOTORIOUS LIARS!

PAID SHILLS FOR QUEEN MARGRETE!

VIKINGS WERE SWEDISH BULLS!

>he was most likely a dane
baseless and biased speculation, we know for a fact that the kings of house Munsö existed and were descended from Björn. whether or not Björn Järnsida was the son of Ragnar Lodbrokare or not, and whether or not Ragnar's father was Swedish king Sigurd Ring or not is not known.

ayyooo what up bois

longest lasting colonial empire coming through

uh uh, that's right my friends "what I can't believe in only ended in 1999 waaaaht?" haha

where the brown women at

>and if he did, he was most likely a dane
Just because all your rulers were Danes doesn't mean ours were you absolute Dane-slave

Fuck yeah

Attached: 528px-1860-russian-america.jpg (528x599, 137K)

Also this

Attached: 350px-Russia_1533-1896.gif (350x248, 67K)

Scottish BVLL coming through!

Do scotsmen like Norway?

I read somewhere that Hungarians raided the Umayyads and lost, and captured Hungarian warriors were made into the Sultan's bodyguards. Is this true?

Attached: 1542218096081.jpg (900x610, 224K)