Drawings are banned in sweden and canada

>drawings are banned in sweden and canada

Attached: 1556654518504.png (626x516, 61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mangakakalot.com/manga/yakumosan_wa_edzuke_ga_shitai
mangakakalot.com/manga/dame_na_watashi_ni_koishite_kudasai
mangakakalot.com/manga/why_are_you_here_sensei
mangakakalot.com/manga/the_story_of_an_oneesan_who_wants_to_keep_a_high_school_boy
mangakakalot.com/manga/bijin_onna_joushi_takizawasan
mangakakalot.com/manga/kawaii_joushi_o_komarasetai
mangakakalot.com/manga/sensei_lockon
mangakakalot.com/manga/sensei_lockon_2nd
mangakakalot.com/manga/ge918004
manganelo.com/manga/otoyomegatari
mangakakalot.com/manga/watashi_no_shounen_takano_hitomi
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What if it's an adult body but the wikipedia page says it's a 12 year old?

Fucking Based

>looks underage
What does that even mean? Are midgets or dwarves considered underage? Are women with flat chests considered underage?

What's the cutoff point of "looking underage"?

>I like it and has a penis = not underage
>I don't like it = underage.

for fucks sake, just masturbate to "normal" 2D drawings, degenerates
some people probably can't even get that

There is no cutoff point really, as nobody cares.

Basically all anime features underage characters. Anime and other forms of Japanese media should be banned. Problem solved.

>What does that even mean?
Nothing, that's probably the point. They can decide that anything looks underage and can jail anyone for anything. Just like aussies banned women with small boobs.

Anything the judge decides.

Attached: 57ab60fc1562e954a2ad8f57cfbc07a9f24da33d.jpg (857x1500, 533K)

In Australia you're not even allowed to look at small tits.

What does Jow Forums think about Straight Shota?

I thought it was illegal in Finland as well

is viewing this illegal?

Attached: e97ffd0bba1c0e43c0056290729a9973.png (1500x1066, 1.74M)

smelly dumb pedo scum

Favorite hentai genre

He’s not wrong. Fuck pedos.

Yes but its also based.

Based. Expected nothing less from a country that produced Angela White

Based

What? Really?

Based
Small tits should be outlawed.

>it's still the body of a kid
Riddle me this: if I draw the body of a kid being spitroasted by two giganigga's, who exactly is the victim? That's right, nobody. Unless you want to tell me fictional characters have human rights, an idea so retarded not even the most fanatical waifufag would defend it.

Unironically Raphtalia, who's also Girl of the Season.

Attached: 1541792310306.jpg (360x432, 61K)

>n idea so retarded not even the most fanatical waifufag would defend it.
Yes true, however if they do, I can finally make my waifu legal.
I will convert to Islam and marry her!
[spoiler[which would be highly ironic considering who she is

Attached: Krul-Tepes-Edit-riku114-39428194-1280-720.png (1280x720, 789K)

Paedophiles are scum who deserve everything they get. Saying "b-b-b-but its a drawing" is retarded, as if wanking to pic related isn't gay. Normal people do not think raping children is an arousing thing.

You're a nonce and are treated as such.

Attached: tom-of-finland-750x563.jpg (750x563, 102K)

the biggest pedophobes are always pedos in denial

>What does that even mean?

Nothing, so they can criminate everyone they want of being a pedo pig and make him pay reparations to Feminazis.

Literally an Orwellian blackmailing scheme.

I agree, but consider this: from whence does the state get the right to declare what is and isn't normal and - even worse - out law what they deem illegal? There is no justification for it. Feel free to be disgusted by it, I am as well, but the sole purpose of a government is to maximize liberty (even though the very existence of a government is a limit on liberty, we must tolerate it for we live in a world where the non-existence of a government has become impossible). There is zero justification for any law to ban that which does not victimize another or violate the rights of another.

Not that an Angloid would understand, considering you'll need a fucking porn loicense sooner or later.

Pretty much this. It's a paradigm shift from "your rights end where mine begins" (or as Mill put it "your rights end where my nose begins") towards "your rights end where my feelings begin". Because some people FEEL uncomfortable with drawings of naked children, they must be banned. As opposed to banning real child porn, which is banned (or rather should be banned) not because it makes us feel uncomfortable, but because it violates the rights of the underage child who simply cannot consent to such actions.

Attached: 1544814299745.jpg (527x360, 54K)

>the sole purpose of a government is to maximize liberty
According to who? You already accept absolute freedom is unfavourable.

People who defend "muh freedom" are degenerates who fear reprisal against their degenerate ways.

only paedos like loli or defend loli
fact

*Ahem*
There is a middle ground you know.

>are women with flat chests considered underage?
literally why australia banned flat chester porn

No the law just says 'underage or appearing underage'. Which how the fuck do you even enforce that, people dont get arrested because they accidentally clicked on Japanese school girl porn. so tabloids said small tits are banned.

>According to who?
According to practically all the thinkers who created the liberal legal order as we know it today.

Let me reverse the question for you: what grounds does a government have to moralize its people? You can't invoke God, because there's no more divine right. Our rulers are not appointed by God, they therefore have no claim towards directly practising His Order. So where does that justification for moralizing come form? Let me tell you where it comes from: your personal discomfort with certain affairs and your personal desire not to be confronted with them. To that I say: stop being a little bitch and close your eyes.

Fuck off. The only thing worse than an enemy of liberty is someone who wants to compromise with an enemy of liberty. What Radical Centrists do not understand is that there are some things in life on which you must never compromise. Liberty, the freedom from tyranny, is one of those.

Attached: 1554096562096.png (2400x1800, 1.71M)

There exists an objective moral order. Fucking children is not included.

How about you stop pretending your own weaknesses are actually proof you're some kind philosopher and accept your obviously flawed obsession with freedom is a cope to stop you feeling so disgusted at yourself. Stop tolerating evil because its easier than being a good man.

Attached: 1334761607656.png (799x799, 613K)

>There exists an objective moral order.
Correct, but who made the government the executioner of that objective moral order? That's right, nobody. In fact, letting a democratically elected order moralize is exactly what you implicitly claim to oppose: morality by consensus.

The only foundation for objective morality is the metaphysical, which makes God the sole arbiter of morality before whom all men will eventually be judged. The government simply has no authority in this jurisdiction, so to say. Any government that claims otherwise is lying to you in order to expand your authority. Keep whistling "God save the Queen" when you pick up your porn loicense though.

Attached: 1401150267653.gif (640x325, 1.27M)

Could you repeat that first paragraph?

gain height YTcuck

Nobody has any innate "right" to do anything. Governments are the most efficient way to enforce moral behaviour.

>letting a democratically elected order
Where did I advocate for that? Please stick to what I'm really saying versus what you imagine I'm thinking.

kys freedom hating europoor commie scum

He is right you know

They are in Australia.

>Nobody has any innate "right" to do anything.
Appropriate that a Brit would believe that.

>Where did I advocate for [a government based on popular sovereignity]
Oh, you're one of those guys. I don't think a discussion will get us anywhere. You've opted to be a sycophant and if that's what makes you happy, you do you. Just try not to drag the rest of us down with you.

>"More is [insert value here] is good!"
>"Why?"
>"FUCK YOU COMMIE BASTARD FUCKING DIE"

Attached: 1488697572180.jpg (735x562, 129K)

Liberty in a political context is simply being left alone. You're reasoning backwards here: you're not asking a justification for why a government SHOULD do something. Instead, you assume a government is allowed to do everything and the citizen needs a justification for why a government SHOULDN'T do something.

Extended to its logical extreme, this reeks of "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear".

Jappilled and Based.

Yes, because of the hearts you can't see clearly penetration, therefore it is allowed under canadian law.

t. legal scholar

I said yes, but I meant "yes it's legal" obviously, because there is no clear evidence the fictional minor is being penetrated and the drool and lifting of the tiny unnecessary brassiere indicates consent

>pedophobe

holy fuck.

Drawings aren't as long as those aren't traced from real children.
I consider being attracted to drawings and people different things.

Schediophilia is word for attraction toward drawings and animated characters.

So if I want to have sex with my wife Chino I'm just a scheidiophile?

Attached: 1526044271418.jpg (600x677, 374K)

>I want to have sex with my wife Chino

Attached: 583578934985.png (499x385, 102K)

You're arguing people SHOULD be allowed to act immorally and I need to justify why they SHOULDN'T.

Raping children and producing child pornography don't just happen naturally.

un... unh...

uunnnNNNNNAAAAAAAAAAAAGHHHHHH!!!!

CUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

brarhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh BLARGGGGGGGGGGG UUUUUNNNNNHHHHHHHHHHH UNNNHHHH OH GODDDDDDDDDDDD NOT THE

C-C-C-CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCUUUUUUUUUUUU

UUUUUUUUUUU

UUUUUUNNNNN

NNNNNNNNNNNN

NNNNNNNNNNNN

NNNNYYYYYYYYY

YYYYY!!!

CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY CUNNY

ME WANT CUNNY ME WANT CUNNY CUNNNY ME WANT ME WANT ME WANT LITTLE CUNNY ME

CCCCUUUNNNN-NN-N-N-EEE HEHEHE HHEEIIIIYYYY BOBOBOBOBOBOBOBO UUUAAAGGHHH

ZOBOLA DE MATRE DE DOON DOON DEL LAHO BANO GO DANI OH LA GOUUUUAaaaaaaaaaAAAAHHhhhHHH

AAAAAHHHHHHHH MALAOGOUGAAAAAAAAAAAA

BWOOOOOOOOOOP

ughhhhhh... unnnnhhhh...

give me that sweet cu cu cu........................

CUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

UGHHGHH GOOODODDDDDD SWEET CUNNY I WANT THAT... unnnhh... FRESH PISSy SMEELLLLL

I WANT TO LICK AND suck and LICK AND SUCK FINGER AND LIKC AND FINGER LICKCLICKLICKLICKCLIKCLCICIKCLCKLCLKCLICKCKCKCKKKKK UUGGNNHGHHHHH GOOOOODDD FFFUUUUUUCCCCKCKKKKKK

th- tth-th---hh...

that...

C
U
N
N
Y
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HERE!!! uaggghh... take my..

...MMMMmmMYY PONOS

to your

y-y-y- your- your-

YOUR vvvvvvvVAGOOOO

and

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm CACAAAAAAAAAAAA

LET ME

J-J- j-j-j-j-jjj---j-jj- g gg--gh-g-jjg----ffffffffkkhkhhhhhh

jj--jj-- J-J-J-J-JJ-J--

JJAAAAAAAMMMMMM


IIIIIIIIIIIITTTTT


IIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNN

NNNGGGGGGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH


MY CUTE SWEET LITTLE

CCCCCUUUNNNNNNNNNNNNNYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'M GONNA CUUUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

NNGNGGUGUUUHHH
HNNGGHHAHAAHHH

uuuUUUuunnhhh.. ugh....

huhh... huhh... huhh...

fuck...

Attached: 1554122139501.jpg (950x950, 411K)

actual paedos don't jerk it to drawings, they go for the real thing

Scheidophile as long as it is attraction toward drawn stuff.

Basado.

What about 11 year old drawn girls that don't look underage?

Attached: 0f85410936563b358c70e84b95c8f787.jpg (750x1028, 120K)

What about five year old drawn girls that look like 100y old men?

>You're arguing people SHOULD be allowed to act immorally and I need to justify why they SHOULDN'T.
Yes, because by letting a government moralize you're presuming moral infallibility on their part. This isn't even liberal, fucking Aquinas already believed not everything that's immoral should be illegal. I'd call your mindset medieval, if not for the fact that it was already outdated in the Middle Ages.

>Appeal to history
You've already lost.

who is more degenerate

a lolilover degenerate or a mature women lover like me

Dear French people, would you create the Franco Germany empire if all German women looked like this?

Attached: bdccc1ba-6d44-166d-c550-9091c0da3bb7-1548796368827.jpg (480x480, 49K)

Attached: inAnirh.png (852x800, 875K)

Good. The moral arc of the universe is long, but it bends towards justice.

you, the motherfucker.

I am not french, can't answer you

hot

there is nothing wrong with older women

based
and bonerpilled

Attached: 1487431107926.jpg (728x1092, 195K)

lmao the europoor thinks i actually tried to understand this inane retard babble rofll oh nononnon look at this dude. you reply to me again and im raping your tight little boipussy queer.

is that a doujin. I want a hot mom to rape me

mangakakalot.com/manga/yakumosan_wa_edzuke_ga_shitai
mangakakalot.com/manga/dame_na_watashi_ni_koishite_kudasai
mangakakalot.com/manga/why_are_you_here_sensei
mangakakalot.com/manga/the_story_of_an_oneesan_who_wants_to_keep_a_high_school_boy
mangakakalot.com/manga/bijin_onna_joushi_takizawasan
mangakakalot.com/manga/kawaii_joushi_o_komarasetai
mangakakalot.com/manga/sensei_lockon
mangakakalot.com/manga/sensei_lockon_2nd
mangakakalot.com/manga/ge918004
manganelo.com/manga/otoyomegatari
mangakakalot.com/manga/watashi_no_shounen_takano_hitomi

There is no need to thank me for we are brethren; separated by land and blood, but united in good taste.

Attached: 1554667031805.jpg (1920x1500, 769K)

>There exists an objective moral order. Fucking children is not included.
depiction of something != something
Or any depiction of murder should be banned? Child porn cannot be tolerated because it takes diddling children to create it. Drawn porn doesn't victimize anyone, no matter how horrid it is. There is murder drawn porn, rape drawn porn and all kinds of degenerate shit, but there's absolutely no reason to ban it, since it DOES NO HARM. Maybe if someone is really drawn to it, he should get counseling to discover why is that, but only a slave-mentality brit would want to ban it just because reasons.

if this gif doesn't turn your male instincts on, you are not a man

Attached: 1543500263920.gif (296x524, 2.27M)

I want to commit a crime.

holy shit...........

I never expected that I would meet a man of taste at such a period in history.....

are they all +18 ?

>Not going for her swole mad
Shit taste lad

>are they all +18 ?
Only "Why are you here, sensei?". Otoyomegatari has some tasteful nudity though.

Attached: Hand Gripper.webm (540x720, 2.24M)

You see there comes a point where they just stop wanting any freedoms and accept the fact that they're slaves. This Canadian is already at that point. He's happy without his freedoms. He's happy being another cog in the system, doing what it is told. This one is a good little dog. He will only be the second to die.

Attached: 1489743211790.jpg (750x725, 111K)

if u get off to erotic depictions of children im sorry but im just gonna hae to dab on you

Attached: 6ebc7c3165e1e86351a08c2c784c948f_400x400.jpg (400x400, 31K)

there's nothing gay about it so long as you imagine yourself being on top
based
t. secretly a spider

That is a drawing

How the fuck is this still up?

im the janny and im jerking off to it

Which one should I read first, which one do you recommend?

Attached: 1556618282139.jpg (620x413, 44K)

Is Jow Forums1406478/d58c09c08a/ ok to fap to?

You don't know a lot about Canada or Canadians do you?

Hereby I declare you and your ways degenerate. Thou shall rot in jail.

unironically based

Is this ok then?

Attached: tumblr_on67eoOCcs1tw58h4o1_500.gif (500x442, 1.62M)

>so tabloids said small tits are banned
lel

Attached: 1490911998592.jpg (600x600, 113K)

What's the problem with wanting to fuck a 12-14yo girl? they are objectively in the best age

>this much straw

It's not gay if it's a drawing

They have a point though

It's not the body of a kid though, it's a drawing. A body is a body. A drawing of a body is not a body, it's a drawing.

>I'm a good man because I want to harm people for drawing things.

>Drawings aren't as long as those aren't traced from real children.
And, just like real CP, only illegal if you save it on your device or pay for access.

New Jojo looking good

Who's the victim of some fat dude jacking it to toons?